the janitor wrote:

Mr. Barborito posted the topic specifically to start a fight, so wouldn't a responce to him be fighting him?

Your "evidence" is that I disagreed with someone who wanted people to disagree with him, like most of the people who posted to this topic, are they tj too?
I have to look into what type of computer that you have, one that translates posts written on a forum into voice so you can claim they are "screeching," are you finally blind from all that public beating-off that you need a special computer to read for you?

So he wouldn't change his S/N to post on the abortion issue, but he would to post on this and whatever the other issue was?

Maybe the reason he went to Planethate was because OMM was shut down. Maybe he wasn't following you, maybe just the crowd of people. What's your excuse for showing up at Planethate? In *fact* the janitor showed up there *before* you did.

I recall that he was *asked* to switch S/Ns to avoid any connection to his site, and that when someone called him on it, the first thing he did was admit it. His post below even points out that that's why he changed his S/N. Why do you ignore those?

Yes you were at OMM before the janitor, and even before me, but the janitor showed up at Planethate before you, before me as well, I wouldn't know about Qt3, is this comma thing as annoying as your parenthesis thing, proving that someone else knew enough about your obsession to supply you with information they knew you wanted isn't helping your case, it just proves other people notice your problem.

"Even when you don't post there"? How can he be following you if janitor doesn't know you're there, that makes no sense at all.

He moved to Vegas to be near you, you wanna back that up with something?

It's been established that tj is paranoid, so of course he accuse you of things, you're the most likely suspect.
This is YOUR FUCKING SITE? By virtue of what? The fact that you're here? Is this YOUR FUCKING INTERNET too?
Also you didn't answer my question about registering to QT3, so I don't expect you to answer any of the *other* questions either.

I said it again as a reason of why I should *not* be bothering to defend tj, you see sometime other words in the sentence allude to the meaning of the entire sentence, usually this is called "context".
Because you *do* twist the truth, see above as evidence, and that you are using that twisted truth as evidence in your case against tj is just wrong, there are plenty of things pointing to his ignorance without you making stuff up too.
I'll never use "fight" again because I just thought it was clever for this topic, and I'll promptly go back to lurking, having wasted my time with you.