|
by Entropy Stew 07/23/2003, 6:32pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Lufteufel wrote:
Fine, I'm willing to grant that your boring CGI-script updated homepage technically qualifies as a "weblog." A winner is you, I guess. Almost no one was interested in doing that kind of thing back in 1995, not because we were too dumb to wrap our Neanderthal brains around such a grand, paradigm-busting concept, but because it's totally lame and uninteresting. One might even compare it to an unfrosted cake.
I found Hokie's article via a link from the Joel on Software blog. I found the article to be both well thought out and interesting. I found Joel on Software through a link somewhere else (Slashdot? The Register?). The almighty A HREF was all the HIGH TECH needed to get me reading it. Then, I emailed him when I found out he was Hokie. Very little in the way of frosting involved there, no? You see, people don't read blogs because they're HIGH TECH, they read them because they're well written or interesting. Do I give a shit that Where is Raed? has an rss feed and a buddylist and smiley icons and Gopher support? Fuck no. I'm just there to read his updates because they're interesting. Please also to be noting my lack of interest in his cat and/or 6 meg animated gif backgrounds.
Another thing you fail to take into consideration is that, technologically, there was nothing holding back the development of these hyperglycemic features. Sure, you'd be roughing it back in 95, but a lot of present-day functionality existed in sko ur-form as far back as the wild west pre-net BBS days. Not that it even matters. All blogs are are an easy way to put thoughts on the page. HOW TOTALLY LAME AND UNINTERESTING. Dumbass.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/20/2003, 10:44pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by DrunkofKittens 07/21/2003, 12:14am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by whydirt, fag prince of jazz 07/21/2003, 12:25am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Fullofkittens 07/21/2003, 12:39am PDT
Should've read this before posting, but I had links and stuff . . . yeah. NT by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 2:17am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by E. L. Koba 07/21/2003, 12:49am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by laudablepuss 07/21/2003, 3:21pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by E. L. Koba 07/21/2003, 6:40pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by whydirt 07/21/2003, 6:48pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by E. L. Koba 07/21/2003, 7:49pm PDT
That guy was part of the original OMM community, dicklick by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 2:14am PDT
Re: That guy was part of the original OMM community, dicklick by Monty Cantsin 07/21/2003, 7:07pm PDT
Re: That guy was part of the original OMM community, dicklick by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/21/2003, 8:26pm PDT
We just found out yesterday, pretty much NT by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 11:11pm PDT
Oh yeah, nice to see you NT by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 11:12pm PDT
Wow, I brought both Hokie and Monty with that one.It's like I drew the Powerball by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 11:13pm PDT
I wonder if they would like to join my Friendster network? HMM? NT by conflictNo 07/22/2003, 2:07am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 2:31am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Bill Dungsroman 07/21/2003, 1:15pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Fullofkittens 07/21/2003, 7:24pm PDT
Damn. I guess I'm one of the idiots that forget to preview. :( NT by Fullofkittens 07/21/2003, 7:25pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Bill Dungsroman 07/21/2003, 7:55pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by whydirt 07/21/2003, 12:17am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/21/2003, 7:03pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 7:39pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/21/2003, 9:00pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/21/2003, 10:15pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/21/2003, 10:26pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/23/2003, 12:26am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/23/2003, 1:07pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/23/2003, 5:47pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/23/2003, 6:32pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Fullofkittens 07/24/2003, 9:24am PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Monty Cantsin 07/22/2003, 7:07pm PDT
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/23/2003, 12:39am PDT
Not the measurement of conjugate quantum attributes. by Chairman Mao 07/23/2003, 12:43am PDT
Re: Not the measurement of conjugate quantum attributes. by Oscar Mayer Wilder 07/23/2003, 2:38am PDT
UR GAY. NT by Chairman Mao 07/23/2003, 2:46am PDT
Nitpicking your example by Entropy Stew 07/23/2003, 6:40pm PDT
Re: Nitpicking your example by Monty Cantsin 07/24/2003, 1:58am PDT
I like cupcakes NT by Entropy Stew 07/24/2003, 2:14am PDT
Personal Questions by Fussbett 07/24/2003, 4:25am PDT
Re: Personal Questions by Monty Cantsin 07/24/2003, 6:09pm PDT
|
|
