|
by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 7:39pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Lufteufel wrote:
whydirt wrote:
My favorite part:
Hokie Mokie wrote:
I can't tell you why it took as long for weblogs to happen as it did, except to say it had absolutely nothing to do with technology. We had every bit of technology we needed to do weblogs the day Mosaic launched the first forms-capable browser. Every single piece of it was right there. Instead, we got Geocities. Why did we get Geocities and not weblogs? We didn't know what we were doing.
One was a bad idea, the other turns out to be a really good idea. It took a long time to figure out that people talking to one another, instead of simply uploading badly-scanned photos of their cats, would be a useful pattern.
Running a weblog with articles, forums, and user registrations takes a hell of a lot more technology than a few HTML <form> tags.
All you'd need to write a blog is CGI and a forms-capable browser. Sorry.
The free scripting and database technology that drives weblogs (e.g., PHP+MySQL+web interface) wasn't really accessible to non-programmers until recently. Uploading pictures of our cats to static HTML pages was all that most of us could do with widely available technology.
THIS IS THE EXACT POINT HE WAS MAKING. Nobody wrote it, so it wasn't available. Why did nobody write it? Because they didn't think of it.
To be honest, I gave up on the article entirely after this clunky gem of flatulent pseudo-profundity:
Geoff Cohen has a great observation about this. He said "The likelihood that any unmoderated group will eventually get into a flame-war about whether or not to have a moderator approaches one as time increases."
You know what? The liklihood that anything will happen anywhere approaches one as time increases, you fatuous fucking gasbag.
You're mincing words while ignoring the point. Substitute "somewhat rapidly approaches" in there, then shut the fuck up.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/20/2003, 10:44pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by DrunkofKittens 07/21/2003, 12:14am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by whydirt, fag prince of jazz 07/21/2003, 12:25am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Fullofkittens 07/21/2003, 12:39am PDT 
Should've read this before posting, but I had links and stuff . . . yeah. NT by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 2:17am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by E. L. Koba 07/21/2003, 12:49am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by laudablepuss 07/21/2003, 3:21pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by E. L. Koba 07/21/2003, 6:40pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by whydirt 07/21/2003, 6:48pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by E. L. Koba 07/21/2003, 7:49pm PDT 
That guy was part of the original OMM community, dicklick by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 2:14am PDT 
Re: That guy was part of the original OMM community, dicklick by Monty Cantsin 07/21/2003, 7:07pm PDT 
Re: That guy was part of the original OMM community, dicklick by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/21/2003, 8:26pm PDT 
We just found out yesterday, pretty much NT by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 11:11pm PDT 
Oh yeah, nice to see you NT by Senor Barborito 07/21/2003, 11:12pm PDT 
Wow, I brought both Hokie and Monty with that one.It's like I drew the Powerball by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 11:13pm PDT 
I wonder if they would like to join my Friendster network? HMM? NT by conflictNo 07/22/2003, 2:07am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 2:31am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Bill Dungsroman 07/21/2003, 1:15pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Fullofkittens 07/21/2003, 7:24pm PDT 
Damn. I guess I'm one of the idiots that forget to preview. :( NT by Fullofkittens 07/21/2003, 7:25pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Bill Dungsroman 07/21/2003, 7:55pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by whydirt 07/21/2003, 12:17am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/21/2003, 7:03pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/21/2003, 7:39pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/21/2003, 9:00pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/21/2003, 10:15pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/21/2003, 10:26pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/23/2003, 12:26am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Hokie Mokie, the King of Jazz 07/23/2003, 1:07pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/23/2003, 5:47pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Entropy Stew 07/23/2003, 6:32pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Fullofkittens 07/24/2003, 9:24am PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Monty Cantsin 07/22/2003, 7:07pm PDT 
Re: Interesting Link: Group dynamics in online communities by Lufteufel 07/23/2003, 12:39am PDT 
Not the measurement of conjugate quantum attributes. by Chairman Mao 07/23/2003, 12:43am PDT 
Re: Not the measurement of conjugate quantum attributes. by Oscar Mayer Wilder 07/23/2003, 2:38am PDT 
UR GAY. NT by Chairman Mao 07/23/2003, 2:46am PDT 
Nitpicking your example by Entropy Stew 07/23/2003, 6:40pm PDT 
Re: Nitpicking your example by Monty Cantsin 07/24/2003, 1:58am PDT 
I like cupcakes NT by Entropy Stew 07/24/2003, 2:14am PDT 
Personal Questions by Fussbett 07/24/2003, 4:25am PDT 
Re: Personal Questions by Monty Cantsin 07/24/2003, 6:09pm PDT 
|
|