|
by Entropy Stew 07/12/2005, 2:37am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Robsuke wrote:
Universal Plan B wrote:
We don't want a cheat, we want to play games where the obstacles are difficult challenges to overcome, not annoying limitations to work around (or put up with). A game where gems have to be identified is not very believable but ok, but a game where the best method of identifying them is to find a unicorn to throw them at is ridiculous. Besides, nethack's cheats don't solve the problem that you have to read a 50 page manual (written by eric raymond for god's sake) and memorize 100 one letter commands before you can even begin to play. Nethack is a game for people who think that emacs or vi are great ways to write text.
Indeed. And the problem with people who think that emacs or vi suck and also hate nethack (usually they are the same crowd) are people who are scared of having to actually learn to use the software - they stick with software that they dont have to read manuals for so they can get to work quicker, but pay for it by having to work with less efficient software - and playing less variable games (with possibly great graphics, but for that there is video...)
I programmed like half of this forum in vim. Nethack sucks. Simplicity is good. Simplicity of interface is even better. vim has a non-intuitive, terse interface. vim is very efficient when you are jacked into the com port of a Pleistocene Netra at 9600 baud. vim is not nearly as efficient to program in as my IDE running on a gui running on a machine with a gig+ of memory. Complexity is not efficiency.
Lack of a visceral interface does allow for easier implementation of a greater possibility-space, but this gain is offset heavily by the exponentially more abstract nature of interaction: you are in the gnomish mine. I would much rather be *in* the gnomish mine. With chain blades. Actually, fuck your gnomish mine. I would much rather be *in* the Olson Twins. Fuck your imagination right in its pointy spock ear, too - I want my robot hookers, and I want them fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
NetHack is gayness by foolio 10/07/2004, 10:14pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by curst 10/07/2004, 11:03pm PDT 
This game can be simulated by taking thimbles and moving them on paper. by Creexul :( 10/08/2004, 12:21am PDT 
Re: This game can be simulated by taking thimbles and moving them on paper. by anon 06/07/2005, 6:20pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by Fussbett 10/08/2004, 12:31am PDT 
Nethack is awesomeness by Daverd 10/08/2004, 1:05am PDT 
Re: Nethack is awesomeness by anon 06/07/2005, 10:07pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is awesomeness by Voyons Donc 06/08/2005, 11:10am PDT 
Re: Nethack is awesomeness by Stu 03/18/2008, 3:21pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by N 10/08/2004, 11:20pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by anon 06/07/2005, 6:20pm PDT 
Mischief Maker and I both hate it too. NT by whydirt 10/08/2004, 11:35pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by anon 06/06/2005, 10:08pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by mark 06/06/2005, 11:17pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by Daverd 06/07/2005, 7:37am PDT 
I so didn't reread this thread I didn't even notice the title of your post. NT by mark 06/07/2005, 9:25am PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by anon 06/07/2005, 6:18pm PDT 
Re: NetHack is gayness by anon 06/07/2005, 6:12pm PDT 
"you're not hardcore enough for this game, go back to (simpler, more fun game)" NT by Defense of overrated indy games 06/07/2005, 1:23am PDT 
Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Robsuke 07/11/2005, 3:00am PDT 
I don't know shit about nethack, never played it, and it sucks. NT by Creexul :( 07/11/2005, 4:33am PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Tony 07/11/2005, 4:40am PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Robsuke 07/11/2005, 11:44am PDT 
you're not hardcore enough for this game, go back to (simpler, more fun game) by Defense of overrated indy games 07/11/2005, 9:04am PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Bill Dungsroman 07/11/2005, 12:32pm PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Robsuke 07/15/2005, 6:37am PDT 
Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS... BUT NOT ALL OF THEM! by Mischief Maker 07/11/2005, 5:10pm PDT 
You're thinking about Nethack the wrong way by Daverd 07/11/2005, 7:51pm PDT 
Lets put Nethack on a list with classic arcade games! by A Retarded Person 07/11/2005, 10:51pm PDT 
Re: Lets put Nethack on a list with classic arcade games! by Daverd 07/11/2005, 11:21pm PDT 
Re: Lets put Nethack on a list with classic arcade games! by bombMexico 07/11/2005, 11:53pm PDT 
Re: Lets put Nethack on a list with classic arcade games! by Robsuke 07/15/2005, 6:31am PDT 
Yeah, force everyone into "Ironman Mode", that's the ticket. by Worm 07/15/2005, 8:30am PDT 
One more person to the pile officially makes this a gangrape by bombMexico 07/11/2005, 11:27pm PDT 
Re: One more person to the pile officially makes this a gangrape by Robsuke 07/15/2005, 6:36am PDT 
(actually, he's in denial about being 100% gay) NT by Robsuke's wife 07/15/2005, 7:25am PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Entropy Stew 07/12/2005, 1:09am PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Rafiki 07/12/2005, 12:13pm PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by Bill Dungsroman 07/12/2005, 1:20pm PDT 
WHAT?! by Fussbett 07/12/2005, 3:31pm PDT 
Jesus, did you drop your Molson or what? by Bill Dungsroman 07/12/2005, 10:05pm PDT 
Re: Jesus, did you drop your Molson or what? by I need clarification 07/12/2005, 11:17pm PDT 
OMG IT TAKES YOUR HALF INCH COCK 30 MINUTES TO RECOVER AHHAAA HA NT by BDRbot 07/12/2005, 3:49pm PDT 
Re: Most arguments against nethack here are utter BS by laudablepuss 07/12/2005, 2:33pm PDT 
Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Mischief Maker 06/07/2005, 2:14pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Ice Cream Jonsey 06/07/2005, 2:59pm PDT 
Also, as contracted by Ice Cream Jonsey 06/07/2005, 3:14pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by anon 06/07/2005, 6:15pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Creexul :( 06/07/2005, 7:07pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Universal Plan B 06/07/2005, 7:38pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Creexul :( 06/07/2005, 7:43pm PDT 
There are graphical frontends for nethack NT by Daverd 06/08/2005, 3:40pm PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Robsuke 07/11/2005, 3:17am PDT 
video by Fussbett 07/11/2005, 5:27am PDT 
you're not hardcore enough for this software go back to (simpler software) NT by Defense of overrated indy aps 07/11/2005, 9:05am PDT 
Re: Nethack is everything bad about cRPGs in your face with none of the good. by Entropy Stew 07/12/2005, 2:37am PDT 
Frawress Victory! NT by Thread announcer 07/12/2005, 6:00pm PDT 
I enjoy fighting monsters, not your inventory/biological functions/interface by Mischief Philistine 06/11/2005, 8:08pm PDT 
|
|