|
|
| |
Forum Overview
::
Peter Molyneux's The Movies
|
| |
|
by bombMexico 05/16/2009, 9:27pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
There's a subtle but important difference between knowing the simliarities between Vulcans and Romulans and knowing spocks moms name. There's not much nerdy behaviour that i raise my eyebrow at (STAR TREK REFERENCE) but you went too far.
I think BRUCE BANNER whoever went out of his way to let everyone know "fuk Romulus I just want revenge" so hogging all that precious mining technology isn't suprising. And again (AGAIN) if he risked going to Earth he would've maybe missed spock, I don't know if they have huge mining shuttlecraft on that thing.
I can play too (and probably better than you!) so let me try a couple on:
- Why don't the miners have the same haircut every other Vulcan/Romulan (except Tuvac?) in the universe have? I figured it was what future space Romulans looked like but it's revealed they're from only just past Next Generation time, and they still had Spock hair and gay square shouldered armor then. Maybe space mining is boring and they have shit else to do but make head tattoos? I didn't see any lady romulans on board so this is a great guess. These are nerd answers, the real one is that a fucking Star Trek Romulan is visually unacceptable to any non virgin and was the first change made.
- Was the opening vessel's shuttlecraft called the U.S.S Idaho? (This is explained away by old Spock later on but i thought it was terribly clever
- I think maybe ONE phaser rakes the opening ship coming from the Romulans, asides from that there are no star trek wide beam phaser things just the byew byew ones :( And what was that clicking from blue to red hand phaser shit?
- NO STAIRS! Who designed that thing? Was jumping deck to deck that much of a time saver? That ship was huge!
- Gay new aliens i don't care about. Extra exagerated features black guy alien in the bar between kirk and Uherara, kind of huge eyes girl, others with slight human changes so minute I didn't notice? Awful. Throw in a Gorn fuckers!
Nerd rage...subsiding. Any other arguments you need help winning just let me know!
Last wrote:
Ahhhh, I'm just kidding! You're a good guy and you can destroy me in a battle of words. Since you responded, though...
a.) Nero's ship is fucking incredible compared to the entire fleet of the Federation. I bet the Romulans would like to have their hands on it no matter whether it was a mining ship or not.
b.) Nero waited 25+ YEARS for Spock to show up with the red matter, but I'm saying why bother considering how easily he could have fucked up 130-years-past Earth and Vulcan with only the mining laser.
It was a fun movie, though! I liked how each (major) crewmember got their own memorable scene. I also liked the diversity of the crew (did you catch that 50 year old working communications? Nice!) and Kirk's swagger. He was outnumbered in the bar fight and goaded the guy relentlessly and then got his shit pushed in! That was great. I can't wait for the sequel. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
ok spoilers about the star trek movie *spoilers* by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 10:38pm PDT 
I thought it was quite entertaining as well. ^_^ by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/08/2009, 10:46am PDT
I'll watch it when Stroke Guy does a youtube thing of it. :( by laudablepuss 05/08/2009, 4:40pm PDT
It uses time travel and a prequel, the worst elements of Star Trek: Enterprise by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 4:51pm PDT
Apparently JJ Abrams is asking Trek fans not to watch the movie by Mischief Maker 05/08/2009, 5:02pm PDT
Counterpoint by Fussbett 05/08/2009, 8:32pm PDT
That guy from Big Hollywood's review - Scotty is Star Trek V Scotty, not TOS by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 8:58pm PDT
Confused Matthew review! (Audio Only) by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 9:41pm PDT
Also don't click that if you don't want it ruined for you NT by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 9:41pm PDT
Nemoy doesn't have a cameo, he has a major role. by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/08/2009, 10:55pm PDT
It's NImoy. Some fan/transcriber you turbed out to be. by I need clarification 05/09/2009, 3:58pm PDT
Haha "turbed"! I think that actually works better. NT by I need clarification 05/09/2009, 3:59pm PDT
Why is The Onion video so much better than The Onion print? by I dunno 05/09/2009, 9:52pm PDT
Futuristic Romulan spaceship from the FUTURE (no stairs, jumping more efficent) by bombMexico 05/10/2009, 12:59pm PDT
Re: Futuristic Romulan spaceship from the FUTURE (no stairs, jumping more effice by laudablepuss 05/11/2009, 1:27am PDT
my actual opinion so everyone else can discard their own by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/09/2009, 12:46am PDT
Re: my actual opinion so everyone else can discard their own by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/09/2009, 12:52am PDT
Star Trek is supposed to have ineffectual half-hearted action sequences damnit! NT by I'm thoroughly outraged! 05/11/2009, 2:18pm PDT
There's an Onion video linked in this thread that you're going to love, man. NT by Fussbett 05/11/2009, 2:47pm PDT
You're right, I was snooped. by bink 05/11/2009, 2:56pm PDT
Re: ok spoilers about the star trek movie *spoilers* by Last 05/15/2009, 9:00pm PDT
Heh, fanbois/otakukin. NT by "Heh" guy 05/16/2009, 6:11am PDT
Heh. Fanbois. Otakukin. *envelope* Name three things only faggots would say. NT by Carnac the Magnificent 05/16/2009, 10:55am PDT
HEY FUCK YOU MAN I mean that person is probably not a faggot. NT by Worm 05/16/2009, 6:53pm PDT
let me answer these as clinically and as boring as possible *phasers to gay* by bombMexico 05/16/2009, 7:34pm PDT
I am a nerd, says guy falling all over himself defending Star Trek. by Last 05/16/2009, 8:06pm PDT
TOP QUOTING INVOLVED you've all been warned by bombMexico 05/16/2009, 9:27pm PDT
"shields down to x percent" almost killed the star trek franchise by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/17/2009, 8:02am PDT
The 2 parter NG Borg finale had it = NT by FABIO 05/17/2009, 1:14pm PDT
Back when it meant something. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/17/2009, 1:20pm PDT
Movie could be 45 minutes shorter by Ray of Light 05/19/2009, 11:39am PDT
|
|
| |
|
| |
