Forum Overview :: Peter Molyneux's The Movies
 
Re: Futuristic Romulan spaceship from the FUTURE (no stairs, jumping more effice by laudablepuss 05/11/2009, 1:27am PDT
bombMexico wrote:

Mischief Maker wrote:

Right, because making a star trek movie with the original characters and ships and a cameo by Leonard Nimoy is TOTALLY meant to appeal to non-fans as opposed to a new crew and a new ship.

I don't know what it is about Star Trek that makes the people working on it despise the fans so much. Especially the same fans who keep your show afloat long after your writing turns it to shit.


Yes, thank you trekkies for keeping Voyager on the air for 7 fucking years, and Enterprise for however long that lasted. The world owes you such a debt, all that awful tv that we could have had canceled in the first season.

Anyways, I'm with ink, the rest of you are stupid, maybe assholes. An entertaining movie, well paced, decent story and they gave them good dialogue. Hrngh they didn't use an all new cast so they are appealing to 50 year olds wait till the internet hears about this! I don't know what red matter is, I assumed it was a Hitchcock black powder MacGuffin, but i'm assuming there's a great reason Spock needed a giant thousand gallon ball of it when he was only going to use a syringe-full. Wastefulness is illogical:(

I was going to complain about not using any of the old cheezy aliens (blue antennae, Gorn, even a ferengi) but they had a big boobed green alien girl so i guess it balanced out. My brother saw it and said Sulu guy was the only one not trying to sound like the original character. I guess he's right but if anything the Chekov was trying too hard - ALSO - how do you replicate George Tekai? Impossible.

No mexicans in the future :)


Giving credit to the fans for keeping Voyager on the air (it was the new UPN network, they literally had a blank check there) or Enterprise is just as bad as giving the fans credit for OMG saving the original series or causing the Motion Picture to be made or whatever. I doubt those letters made any contribution at all to keeping Trek on the air for another season.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
ok spoilers about the star trek movie *spoilers* by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 10:38pm PDT NEW
    I thought it was quite entertaining as well. ^_^ by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/08/2009, 10:46am PDT NEW
        I'll watch it when Stroke Guy does a youtube thing of it. :( by laudablepuss 05/08/2009, 4:40pm PDT NEW
            It uses time travel and a prequel, the worst elements of Star Trek: Enterprise by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 4:51pm PDT NEW
                Apparently JJ Abrams is asking Trek fans not to watch the movie by Mischief Maker 05/08/2009, 5:02pm PDT NEW
                    Counterpoint by Fussbett 05/08/2009, 8:32pm PDT NEW
                    That guy from Big Hollywood's review - Scotty is Star Trek V Scotty, not TOS by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 8:58pm PDT NEW
                    Confused Matthew review! (Audio Only) by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 9:41pm PDT NEW
                        Also don't click that if you don't want it ruined for you NT by Fortinbras 05/08/2009, 9:41pm PDT NEW
                    Nemoy doesn't have a cameo, he has a major role. by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/08/2009, 10:55pm PDT NEW
                        It's NImoy. Some fan/transcriber you turbed out to be. by I need clarification 05/09/2009, 3:58pm PDT NEW
                            Haha "turbed"! I think that actually works better. NT by I need clarification 05/09/2009, 3:59pm PDT NEW
                            Why is The Onion video so much better than The Onion print? by I dunno 05/09/2009, 9:52pm PDT NEW
                    Futuristic Romulan spaceship from the FUTURE (no stairs, jumping more efficent) by bombMexico 05/10/2009, 12:59pm PDT NEW
                        Re: Futuristic Romulan spaceship from the FUTURE (no stairs, jumping more effice by laudablepuss 05/11/2009, 1:27am PDT NEW
    my actual opinion so everyone else can discard their own by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/09/2009, 12:46am PDT NEW
        Re: my actual opinion so everyone else can discard their own by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/09/2009, 12:52am PDT NEW
    Star Trek is supposed to have ineffectual half-hearted action sequences damnit! NT by I'm thoroughly outraged! 05/11/2009, 2:18pm PDT NEW
        There's an Onion video linked in this thread that you're going to love, man. NT by Fussbett 05/11/2009, 2:47pm PDT NEW
            You're right, I was snooped. by bink 05/11/2009, 2:56pm PDT NEW
    Re: ok spoilers about the star trek movie *spoilers* by Last 05/15/2009, 9:00pm PDT NEW
        Heh, fanbois/otakukin. NT by "Heh" guy 05/16/2009, 6:11am PDT NEW
            Heh. Fanbois. Otakukin. *envelope* Name three things only faggots would say. NT by Carnac the Magnificent 05/16/2009, 10:55am PDT NEW
                HEY FUCK YOU MAN I mean that person is probably not a faggot. NT by Worm 05/16/2009, 6:53pm PDT NEW
        let me answer these as clinically and as boring as possible *phasers to gay* by bombMexico 05/16/2009, 7:34pm PDT NEW
            I am a nerd, says guy falling all over himself defending Star Trek. by Last 05/16/2009, 8:06pm PDT NEW
                TOP QUOTING INVOLVED you've all been warned by bombMexico 05/16/2009, 9:27pm PDT NEW
            "shields down to x percent" almost killed the star trek franchise by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/17/2009, 8:02am PDT NEW
                The 2 parter NG Borg finale had it = NT by FABIO 05/17/2009, 1:14pm PDT NEW
                    Back when it meant something. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/17/2009, 1:20pm PDT NEW
        Movie could be 45 minutes shorter by Ray of Light 05/19/2009, 11:39am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy