|
by Zseni 12/13/2004, 2:26pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
This fucking sucks. I remember when this was called WinMX, except you could download stuff there. And you had a shot at getting those fucking Bee Gees albums you were looking for.
Back when I lived in St. Louis there was a cool-ass record store specializing in electronic music. It was so fucking cool that most of the time the owner and employees wouldn't even show up until two or three hours past the posted store hours, and then they would sell me CDs and records with open, naked, derogatory smugness. Soulseek is just like being back there. It's the full experience, right down to looking at the album covers and wishing I had enough money to buy stuff, then finally bundling up the scratch, heading in, having to wait for the owner to actually show up and open the place, then discover that due to his arcane theft-prevention filing system the album I've waited all week to purchase is in fact not in its sleeve nor anywhere else in the store.
Just down the street from that froody joint was Vintage Vinyl, one of America's best record stores and one of the few redeeming features St. Louis has. I went to VV all the time and bought stuff right off the shelves like crazy. Sometimes just because I liked the album art! So BitTorrent is the Vintage Vinyl to Soulseek's pretentious electronica shanty: better in every conceivable way. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Soulseek: lightning review by Zseni 12/13/2004, 2:26pm PST 
Vintage Vinyl sucks now NT by Just FYI 12/13/2004, 3:00pm PST
:( Ponyboy joke. NT by Zseni 12/13/2004, 3:21pm PST
What store is emule? It is a crowded mall. NT by Mysterio 12/13/2004, 4:29pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by William H. Hayt, Jr. 12/13/2004, 4:54pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Choson 12/13/2004, 8:08pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Zseni 12/15/2004, 10:42am PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Choson 12/15/2004, 11:31am PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Zseni 12/15/2004, 11:46am PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by William H. Hayt, Jr. 12/15/2004, 1:42pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Zseni 12/18/2004, 5:57am PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Choson 12/18/2004, 7:12am PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Zseni 12/18/2004, 8:48am PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Choson 12/18/2004, 9:39am PST
The problem with BT music is the GBs. by Fullofkittens 12/18/2004, 9:46am PST
Re: The problem with BT music is the GBs. by Azureus 12/18/2004, 11:06am PST
But you can get a single track. by Berlioz 12/18/2004, 11:07am PST
Snooped by seconds. NT by Berlioz 12/18/2004, 11:08am PST
Re: But you can get a single track. by Choson 12/18/2004, 11:19am PST
I am in agreement with you utterly. by Berlioz 12/18/2004, 1:29pm PST
Re: I am in agreement with you utterly. by Choson 12/18/2004, 1:47pm PST
Really? by Berlioz 12/18/2004, 3:41pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Ice Cream Jonsey 12/18/2004, 3:46pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Zseni 12/18/2004, 6:00pm PST
Thank you, you have improved my life. NT by Ice Cream Jonsey 12/18/2004, 6:43pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by William H. Hayt, Jr. 12/18/2004, 3:24pm PST
Re: Soulseek: lightning review by Gorb 12/18/2004, 11:38pm PST
Soulseek: lightning review (Revisited) by Senor Barborito 12/27/2004, 5:13am PST
|
|
