Forum Overview :: The Zionist Media Conspiracy
 
yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by FABIO 07/23/2004, 5:50pm PDT
Rightbug wrote:

Saw it last night. Here's the review I wrote on another board...

Surprisingly, it not only did not suck, but it was better and smarter than your average summer action movie.

Which isn't to say that it's high art or a thinking man's movie but, if you're able to suspend your disbelief, it's an extremely entertaining sci-fi flick.

The special effects are good and even though it seems to turn Isaac Asimov's basic premise (Robots are not Frankenstein's Monster, they exist to serve us) on it's head, it actually sort of doesn't. Or rather, it does and it doesn't and, even when it does, it acknowledges exactly what it's doing.

While the previews seem to give the whole story away, they actually don't. The plot twists were all fairly predictable and I found myself mentally calling the next scene or line repeatedly but, somehow this didn't annoy me, probably because in each instance the writers did exactly what I would have done had I been writing the movie. (Which would sem to imply that, if I ever become a Hollywood screenwriter, I'll churn out predictable, half-baked, pseudo-intellectual action movies.)

Anyway, the effects are excellent and the over-all coolness factor is high. I recommend it.

-- Rb


Borges is obviously too high brow and intelligent to bother with mindless (AMERICAN) Hollywood summer blockbusters since it would take away valuable online Aqua Teen Hunger Force chastising time.


But for the rest of us who recognize foreign films for the faux artsy crap they are and just want to be entertained, this is a very decent (AMERICAN) summer movie. Rightbug pretty much pointed out all the good, so I'll do what I'm best at (next to INC and BDR d&d reviews), point out the bad.

Very vague spoilers ahead! Really though, this movie isn't about being surprised. An obvious plot point in the first 15 minutes shows how shit is going to hit the fan later on and who the villain is (it isn't as hand-guidingly obvious as WHO COULD THE SITH LORD BE in the new Star Wars movies, but you're still a retard if you don't figure it out). You will still be entertained despite this though.


Will Smith is a LOOSE CANNON cop with an angry black captain telling him to TURN IN HIS BADGE. For no apparent reason, right before this they point out that his gun is missing. I guess they did this because telling him to turn in his badge AND gun would have been too cliche.


Rightbug was right about the predictability. Will Smith is told that he will get a company rep to help him with his investigation. Could it be a hot chick that he will argue endlessly with until the very end when they fall in love? Answer: Yes.

The plot is set up a mystery, something which it actually isn't, making it a mystery why they bothered. Will Smith follows a series of pointlessly cryptic clues and figures them out with huge streches of logic. How lazy of a writer are you when your hero is nudged towards the next clue by nothing but a personal ancedote absent mindedly uttered by another character a total of THREE TIMES throughout the movie? It's a total mystery why the person leaving him clues just didn't outright tell him what was going on instead of hoping he'd make all the connections between old news clips and Hansel and Grettel(??!!?!). You also wonder why that person did what he did to get Will Smith's attention when several MUCH EASIER solutions are made apparent.

Even after all the convoluted clues (solved by accident), the whole investigation turns out to be pointless because the clues tell Smith what's going on only after the shit hits the fan, at which point everyone knows. So what's the point?


There is a dork playing a seemingly pointless role, probably because he has connections somewhere. I think this guy won the same "Win a spot in a blockbuster movie!" contest that the mousy kid in Matrix: Revolutions did. Either that or he's the son of an important studio suit.


The movie is set in 2035, which is stupid considering how hi-tech everything is. I thought the public got over the "everything will be so advanced iand futuristic in just 20 years" back in 80's time travel movies. Was it just because that's the year the book was set in? Just for Borges, I'll throw in a Simpsons quote that perfectly sums it up.

Lisa- "(Epcot Center) is what people of 1969 thought the world would be like in 1985."


Finally, I can't believe Rightbug didn't mention how this movie sets a historical highmark for blatant product placement. They do the usual routine of making sure the product logo is properly centered and in focus, but that's not all. The hero, along with the other characters, makes sure to verbally point out how cool the product is no less than THREE times. He also makes it a point to let the audience know that it's a "vintage" 2004 model. BOY WHAT I WOULDN'T GIVE TO BE ONE OF THOSE LUCKY PEOPLE LIVING IN THAT YEAR SO THAT I COULD BUY ONE! It's almost impossible to believe the audacity of it all. It's so bad that you start wondering if the film makers are playing some sort of joke poking fun at product placement. How much did they get paid for this?


Final Verdict: The best Will Smith summer blockbuster yet. It's loads better than that one joke "Weird people are aliens in disguise LOL!" Men in Black. It's like they took the thrills of Indepence Day and took out most of the insultingly stupid parts and touching moments you don't give a crap about like strippers with hearts of gold and ex-wives and dying wives and drunken fathers blah blah blah. It's not brilliant, but a few intelligent moments and points about automation and the three laws are injected into the thing.

In the spirit of whydirt's Jackie Chan rating scale, I present the Will Smith rating system. On a scale of Wild, Wild West to I, Robot, I give I, Robot an I, Robot.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
I, Robot is pretty decent summer entertainment by FABIO 07/21/2004, 1:45pm PDT NEW
    Fucking liar. NT by Borges 07/21/2004, 1:58pm PDT NEW
    Well, If You're Not Going To Do It, I Will. by Rightbug 07/23/2004, 12:18pm PDT NEW
        yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by FABIO 07/23/2004, 5:50pm PDT NEW
            Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by Fullofkittens 07/23/2004, 9:29pm PDT NEW
                Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by laudablepuss 07/24/2004, 1:56am PDT NEW
                    Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by FABIO 07/24/2004, 2:08am PDT NEW
                        I take one bit back by FABIO 07/24/2004, 2:13am PDT NEW
                        Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by laudablepuss 07/24/2004, 2:14am PDT NEW
                    Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by Mysterio 07/25/2004, 10:46pm PDT NEW
    review of the previews by FABIO 07/24/2004, 2:46am PDT NEW
        one more by FABIO 07/26/2004, 1:59am PDT NEW
            Fucking Liar II by Borges 07/28/2004, 1:04am PDT NEW
                Invalidated by FABIO 07/28/2004, 3:20am PDT NEW
                    Ad Hominem you moron by Borges 07/28/2004, 10:08am PDT NEW
                    Re: Invalidated by Borges 07/28/2004, 10:18am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy