|
by Mysterio 07/25/2004, 10:46pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
laudablepuss wrote:
It's pretty fucking hard to get past the fact that the movie's message is directly opposite the message in all of Asimov's robot stories partly because it's named after a collection of those stories and partly because Hollywood appears incapable of making a sci-fi movie involving some great new invention or inovation that DOESN'T go Frankenstein. Even Spider-Man 2 has a little bit of this: machines with AI? Of course they're evil. But most important of all, the entire point of the Three Laws was to refute this idea that technology will must necessarily run amok. Dangerous machines can be built, but machines can also be built with safeguards to prevent accidents.
Granted the movie is essentially a summer action flick that they shoe horned some of Asimov's concepts into because they had the rights and thought it would be a good marketing ploy. The end result, however, is an action movie that's a little better than your typical summer mindless crap. For an Asimov purist I can absolutely see how this would make the movie infuriating but, for the rest of us, we get a pretty fun action movie that doesn't suck balls.
Mild spoilers below...
The whole premise of the movie was pretty much what you say in your last line only we see what can happen if the rules can be over ridden or misinterperated. Also, the audience's window into this was a fairly clever conceipt where Will Smith's character, a black man, is a complete bigot. When I first read that I wondered what sort of a message the movie had if the bigot is basically proved right but, again, the way they handled it was very well done. Indeed, that conflict is sort of the thrust of the whole movie. The apparent contradiction between Asimov's view and a movie about robots gone amuck is reconciled through Will Smith's character as he comes to terms with his bigotry.
None of which is to make this sound like a deep philosophical treatis or high art. Fabio's critiques are all on target and there's plenty about the movie that is rediculous. But again, for someone who is not an Asimov purist and is just looking for a good escapist action movie that delivers on the action without being completely retarded, it's a very fun film.
-- Rb
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
I, Robot is pretty decent summer entertainment by FABIO 07/21/2004, 1:45pm PDT 
Fucking liar. NT by Borges 07/21/2004, 1:58pm PDT 
Well, If You're Not Going To Do It, I Will. by Rightbug 07/23/2004, 12:18pm PDT 
yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by FABIO 07/23/2004, 5:50pm PDT 
Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by Fullofkittens 07/23/2004, 9:29pm PDT 
Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by laudablepuss 07/24/2004, 1:56am PDT 
Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by FABIO 07/24/2004, 2:08am PDT 
I take one bit back by FABIO 07/24/2004, 2:13am PDT 
Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by laudablepuss 07/24/2004, 2:14am PDT 
Re: yeah that was pretty much what I was going to say by Mysterio 07/25/2004, 10:46pm PDT 
review of the previews by FABIO 07/24/2004, 2:46am PDT 
one more by FABIO 07/26/2004, 1:59am PDT 
Fucking Liar II by Borges 07/28/2004, 1:04am PDT 
Invalidated by FABIO 07/28/2004, 3:20am PDT 
Ad Hominem you moron by Borges 07/28/2004, 10:08am PDT 
Re: Invalidated by Borges 07/28/2004, 10:18am PDT 
|
|