|
|
| |
Forum Overview
::
Motherfucking News
|
| |
|
by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:52pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
http://dir.salon.com/mwt/feature/1998/07/10/cov_10feature/index.html?pn=2
So far, CRACK's numbers are sufficiently modest to border on the symbolic. There have been 13 drug-addicted clients, all women, who have chosen sterilization over the less permanent Norplant option. Prior to being sterilized, these 13 women had given birth to 78 children: Six were stillborn, two died after birth and 64 are now in foster care
I think that's important. If it's small and tightly organised, Barbara Harris has only to deal with a compact situation and manageable results. It sounds as though she's dealt with a group narrow enough to be monitored rather than abandoned. The chances of keeping up with those 13 women and monitoring their consequent progress is greater than, say, random birth control for a wider audience.
A nurse at the hospital where she was due to deliver her son encouraged Adams to be sterilized and gave her a CRACK flier. "I didn't care. Money or not, I still wanted my tubes tied," says Adams. She used most of the $200 to buy things for her baby. "I told him, 'Kendall, you're the last button on Gabriel's coat and I'm going to use this on you.'"
Although Adams is not exactly the target CRACK client -- she had already made her decision, and the $200 was just a little more incentive -- she has become a veritable poster child for the program, appearing with Harris on radio and TV. And she has no regrets about her decision. "It is possible that you could regret it," she admits, "but I tell women to have a level head and do it for yourself, nobody else."
That gives us some idea of their publicity. Can't find the link now, but they had a billboard directed more towards the non-addicted public than CRACK's clients themselves. I'd say that, along with their fliers, the advertising doesn't sound too promising. Again, though - it's a narrow focus that, from the quote above, has produced optimal results for 1/13 of the target group. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
$200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Colonel K 01/07/2003, 8:26am PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by up with pod people 01/07/2003, 3:01pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Fussbett 01/07/2003, 3:50pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Senor Barborito 01/07/2003, 4:02pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by up with pod people 01/07/2003, 4:29pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Fussbett 01/08/2003, 3:05am PST 
Excuse me by laudablepuss 01/10/2003, 2:22pm PST 
Re: Excuse me by Rightbug 01/10/2003, 3:06pm PST 
Have your druggies spayed or neutered by the janitor 01/07/2003, 4:45pm PST 
This is nothing new... by Bodybag 01/07/2003, 6:38pm PST 
Might work. by Colonel K 01/07/2003, 10:51pm PST 
Re: Might work. by NOT the janitor...ok, it is 01/08/2003, 3:48am PST 
Re: Might work. by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 5:17am PST 
Re: Might work. by bah 01/08/2003, 5:37pm PST 
Re: Might work. by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:16pm PST 
Also... by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:52pm PST 
Re: Might work. by creativepig 01/09/2003, 8:38am PST 
You certainly cracked that one wide open, Hercule Columbo by Entropy Stew 01/09/2003, 7:31pm PST 
AAAHH!!! Inbred BDR hatred! Leave me aloooooone -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 01/10/2003, 11:50am PST 
Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by ToutSuite 01/07/2003, 10:36pm PST 
Re: Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by Ray, of Light 01/08/2003, 12:18am PST 
Re: Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 1:16am PST 
Demasked! by Fussbett 01/08/2003, 1:27am PST 
You fucks wouldn't be sucking it off if you knew you really wrote it. by Jerksoup 01/08/2003, 1:52am PST 
I thought it was obvious. -nt- by the monk. 01/08/2003, 2:04am PST 
Fuck you shithead by the janitor 01/08/2003, 3:30am PST 
Ode to the janitor by Zseni 01/08/2003, 3:41am PST 
Re: Ode to the janitor by Ray, of Light 01/08/2003, 10:20am PST 
If only I had 200 clams and a ride to the clinic. -nt- by the janitor's mom. 01/08/2003, 5:42am PST 
According to the restroom grafitti you DO have 200 clams NT by Senor Barborito 01/08/2003, 6:34am PST 
graffiti -NT- by Senor Barborito 01/08/2003, 6:34am PST 
Yeah, instead of just one bearded clam and a ride to the frat house(nt) by Bodybag 01/08/2003, 7:40am PST 
I thought the graffiti said she had 2000 crabs. -nt- by laudablepuss 01/08/2003, 1:53pm PST 
Er, that was supposed to say 200. NT by laudablepuss 01/08/2003, 1:54pm PST 
Chalk it up as accuracy at the cost of consistency -nt- by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 2:41pm PST 
I'm the idiot and you people can't spell spell or count? (nt) NT by jhe tanitor 01/08/2003, 5:40pm PST 
2 for 2...he's on a roll!(NT) NT by Bodybag 01/08/2003, 5:50pm PST 
How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by janitor, the 01/08/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by Some fat fat guy 01/08/2003, 7:49pm PST 
Looks like I hit a fat nerve on some poor fatty nt by jhe tanitor 01/08/2003, 8:40pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by the janitor's mom 01/08/2003, 9:43pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by arbit 01/09/2003, 6:16pm PST 
Note to tj: saying things like "I'm the idiot but..." never helps your case -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 01/08/2003, 6:13pm PST 
Specifically, the "but" -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Then interject 'supposedly' into the sentence since it wasn't obvious enough by grah 01/08/2003, 6:31pm PST 
|
|
| |
|
| |