|
|
| |
Forum Overview
::
Motherfucking News
|
| |
|
by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:16pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
bah wrote:
No. I mentioned that CRACK and its robotic cat brethren - organisations tackling different addiction causes or effects - might link up into the only robot big enough and queer enough to produce significant results. Separately, CRACK can only help some people; that's why the
Darryl Strawberrys of the world that just don't want to stop
are either melted into vaseline or helped through other drug-assistance programs. If the solutions to drug addiction were less like Voltron and more like, say, Captain Planet, we'd have our big, gay panacea from the start. On its own, CRACK is like the hispanic kid with the shitty Heart ring. Sure, it never worked, but he completed the team's multicultural rainbow and was occasionally useful on his own. He had the monkey, and it helped with other things sometimes. Is any of this getting through to you?
Don't talk to me like I'm an idiot.
Christ, lighten up. I've always said that if it can't be explained by cartoons, it can't be explained. Why do you think nobody really knows what the fuck entropy is? Measure of decay? What the fuck does that mean?
I already said that whole thing, without the cartoon analogy.
What I'M saying is that people DO NOT want to get off the drugs, so if you make this CRACK program a built in part of another program; if they HAVE to go through another part of the program to get to where they want, they won't bother with the whole thing and nothing will get done. This is aimed at those who KNOW they don't want to get off drugs even if that possiblity is readily available to them.
There will always be people on the drugs that can't be helped regardless, and people that certain programs won't be equipped to deal with. CRACK effectively ignores the problems it can't help, other groups do the same. It's like in Fight Club where Edward Norton and Marla represented the only overlap between self-help groups. Sure, Bob eventually joined Fight Club itself - but then he died.
There's a group to help guys with tits just like there are groups to break the trans-generation cycle of drug dependency. For this, CRACK is just one small percentage of a larger taskforce. If they've got good counsellors and operate their scheme effectively, it might work. It's trying something new, at least.
if they HAVE to go through another part of the program to get to where they want, they won't bother with the whole thing and nothing will get done. This is aimed at those who KNOW they don't want to get off drugs even if that possiblity is readily available to them.
News of the $200 should travel pretty fast. I'm not sure how much bureaucracy stands between this cash and its clients, but for the right people it might cripple the inner-family drug cycle.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
$200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Colonel K 01/07/2003, 8:26am PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by up with pod people 01/07/2003, 3:01pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Fussbett 01/07/2003, 3:50pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Senor Barborito 01/07/2003, 4:02pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by up with pod people 01/07/2003, 4:29pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Fussbett 01/08/2003, 3:05am PST 
Excuse me by laudablepuss 01/10/2003, 2:22pm PST 
Re: Excuse me by Rightbug 01/10/2003, 3:06pm PST 
Have your druggies spayed or neutered by the janitor 01/07/2003, 4:45pm PST 
This is nothing new... by Bodybag 01/07/2003, 6:38pm PST 
Might work. by Colonel K 01/07/2003, 10:51pm PST 
Re: Might work. by NOT the janitor...ok, it is 01/08/2003, 3:48am PST 
Re: Might work. by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 5:17am PST 
Re: Might work. by bah 01/08/2003, 5:37pm PST 
Re: Might work. by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:16pm PST 
Also... by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:52pm PST 
Re: Might work. by creativepig 01/09/2003, 8:38am PST 
You certainly cracked that one wide open, Hercule Columbo by Entropy Stew 01/09/2003, 7:31pm PST 
AAAHH!!! Inbred BDR hatred! Leave me aloooooone -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 01/10/2003, 11:50am PST 
Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by ToutSuite 01/07/2003, 10:36pm PST 
Re: Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by Ray, of Light 01/08/2003, 12:18am PST 
Re: Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 1:16am PST 
Demasked! by Fussbett 01/08/2003, 1:27am PST 
You fucks wouldn't be sucking it off if you knew you really wrote it. by Jerksoup 01/08/2003, 1:52am PST 
I thought it was obvious. -nt- by the monk. 01/08/2003, 2:04am PST 
Fuck you shithead by the janitor 01/08/2003, 3:30am PST 
Ode to the janitor by Zseni 01/08/2003, 3:41am PST 
Re: Ode to the janitor by Ray, of Light 01/08/2003, 10:20am PST 
If only I had 200 clams and a ride to the clinic. -nt- by the janitor's mom. 01/08/2003, 5:42am PST 
According to the restroom grafitti you DO have 200 clams NT by Senor Barborito 01/08/2003, 6:34am PST 
graffiti -NT- by Senor Barborito 01/08/2003, 6:34am PST 
Yeah, instead of just one bearded clam and a ride to the frat house(nt) by Bodybag 01/08/2003, 7:40am PST 
I thought the graffiti said she had 2000 crabs. -nt- by laudablepuss 01/08/2003, 1:53pm PST 
Er, that was supposed to say 200. NT by laudablepuss 01/08/2003, 1:54pm PST 
Chalk it up as accuracy at the cost of consistency -nt- by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 2:41pm PST 
I'm the idiot and you people can't spell spell or count? (nt) NT by jhe tanitor 01/08/2003, 5:40pm PST 
2 for 2...he's on a roll!(NT) NT by Bodybag 01/08/2003, 5:50pm PST 
How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by janitor, the 01/08/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by Some fat fat guy 01/08/2003, 7:49pm PST 
Looks like I hit a fat nerve on some poor fatty nt by jhe tanitor 01/08/2003, 8:40pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by the janitor's mom 01/08/2003, 9:43pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by arbit 01/09/2003, 6:16pm PST 
Note to tj: saying things like "I'm the idiot but..." never helps your case -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 01/08/2003, 6:13pm PST 
Specifically, the "but" -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Then interject 'supposedly' into the sentence since it wasn't obvious enough by grah 01/08/2003, 6:31pm PST 
|
|
| |
|
| |