|
|
| |
Forum Overview
::
Motherfucking News
|
| |
|
by the janitor 01/07/2003, 4:45pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fussbett wrote:
up with pod people wrote:
If a woman is addicted to drugs and has a baby, it's bad for both the baby and for the woman. As this is a wholly voluntary offer, I really can't see the problem with it. Racist my ass.
It's not racist, but it's bad in the same way Bumfights is bad. If you offer $200 to a poor and desperate woman under the condition that they be sterilized, and she takes it, she's not acting out of concern, she's thinking of the $200. As Bumfights has taught us, when poor enough or drunk/high enough, a person will do anything for a few bucks. Bumfights also teaches us that there is nothing more depressing than watching Bumfights. Second, giving poor women a pittance to END THEIR LINEAGE bothers people on a whole Orwelian/Huxlian/Biafrian/Michael Moorian level where the rich are stroking their moustaches and scheming on ways to kill kill kill kill kill the poor.
No offence man but have you ever seen a crack baby? It would change your view on a whole lot of shit.
90% of people addicted to dangerous drugs will never kick the habit, it's just too expensive and/or hard. The thing is totally voluntary as well, and they aren't just sterilizing them all, there are alternatives.
Yes, all she's thinking of is the $200. Why? She wants more drugs. Why? She's addicted. Why? The other programs AREN'T working. The only people opposed to this plan are the religious people (of course), the ones who run other programs (they'll be out of a job or with less donations) and people that just want to be in the news (race related mostly), and of course the hippy 'We Are The World' fucks who make the world WORSE by pretending that everything is all right as long as they hug hard enough. They SHOULD look at it as being better than abortion.
Look who started this program: a woman who adopted four little babies born addicted to drugs. Yeah, I can smell the evil already. Dude, at some point you just see so much horror that you HAVE to do something. I'm sure that woman hit that point a looooong time ago.
And who is this REALLY hurting? Most of these women will O.D. within a year, maybe two. And if they DO kick the habit and become successful, rich women, they can just sue the charity for billions. Easy as pie. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
$200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Colonel K 01/07/2003, 8:26am PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by up with pod people 01/07/2003, 3:01pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Fussbett 01/07/2003, 3:50pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Senor Barborito 01/07/2003, 4:02pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by up with pod people 01/07/2003, 4:29pm PST 
Re: $200 and long-term birth control for addicts. by Fussbett 01/08/2003, 3:05am PST 
Excuse me by laudablepuss 01/10/2003, 2:22pm PST 
Re: Excuse me by Rightbug 01/10/2003, 3:06pm PST 
Have your druggies spayed or neutered by the janitor 01/07/2003, 4:45pm PST 
This is nothing new... by Bodybag 01/07/2003, 6:38pm PST 
Might work. by Colonel K 01/07/2003, 10:51pm PST 
Re: Might work. by NOT the janitor...ok, it is 01/08/2003, 3:48am PST 
Re: Might work. by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 5:17am PST 
Re: Might work. by bah 01/08/2003, 5:37pm PST 
Re: Might work. by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:16pm PST 
Also... by Colonel K 01/08/2003, 7:52pm PST 
Re: Might work. by creativepig 01/09/2003, 8:38am PST 
You certainly cracked that one wide open, Hercule Columbo by Entropy Stew 01/09/2003, 7:31pm PST 
AAAHH!!! Inbred BDR hatred! Leave me aloooooone -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 01/10/2003, 11:50am PST 
Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by ToutSuite 01/07/2003, 10:36pm PST 
Re: Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by Ray, of Light 01/08/2003, 12:18am PST 
Re: Oh, good. Look who's back. And talking. by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 1:16am PST 
Demasked! by Fussbett 01/08/2003, 1:27am PST 
You fucks wouldn't be sucking it off if you knew you really wrote it. by Jerksoup 01/08/2003, 1:52am PST 
I thought it was obvious. -nt- by the monk. 01/08/2003, 2:04am PST 
Fuck you shithead by the janitor 01/08/2003, 3:30am PST 
Ode to the janitor by Zseni 01/08/2003, 3:41am PST 
Re: Ode to the janitor by Ray, of Light 01/08/2003, 10:20am PST 
If only I had 200 clams and a ride to the clinic. -nt- by the janitor's mom. 01/08/2003, 5:42am PST 
According to the restroom grafitti you DO have 200 clams NT by Senor Barborito 01/08/2003, 6:34am PST 
graffiti -NT- by Senor Barborito 01/08/2003, 6:34am PST 
Yeah, instead of just one bearded clam and a ride to the frat house(nt) by Bodybag 01/08/2003, 7:40am PST 
I thought the graffiti said she had 2000 crabs. -nt- by laudablepuss 01/08/2003, 1:53pm PST 
Er, that was supposed to say 200. NT by laudablepuss 01/08/2003, 1:54pm PST 
Chalk it up as accuracy at the cost of consistency -nt- by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 2:41pm PST 
I'm the idiot and you people can't spell spell or count? (nt) NT by jhe tanitor 01/08/2003, 5:40pm PST 
2 for 2...he's on a roll!(NT) NT by Bodybag 01/08/2003, 5:50pm PST 
How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by janitor, the 01/08/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by Some fat fat guy 01/08/2003, 7:49pm PST 
Looks like I hit a fat nerve on some poor fatty nt by jhe tanitor 01/08/2003, 8:40pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by the janitor's mom 01/08/2003, 9:43pm PST 
Re: How many of these posts would be here if I used a different name? by arbit 01/09/2003, 6:16pm PST 
Note to tj: saying things like "I'm the idiot but..." never helps your case -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 01/08/2003, 6:13pm PST 
Specifically, the "but" -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 01/08/2003, 6:26pm PST 
Then interject 'supposedly' into the sentence since it wasn't obvious enough by grah 01/08/2003, 6:31pm PST 
|
|
| |
|
| |