|
by Kthor 03/28/2005, 1:17pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
FABIO wrote:
1. Upkeep model- You mentioned something about changing this. I'd say lowering upkeep & movement costs but increasing production costs would improve things a lot. Right now initial production costs are extremely low but upkeep/movement costs are extremely high (25% production cost in upkeep per turn). You're never too broke to make new units, you just can't afford to upkeep or move them. So the computer keeps pumping out annoying ships every turn I have to kill even though it can't afford to do anything with them.
This is getting adjusted along these lines in the patch. The resources thing is a little different but will see some tweaking.
FABIO wrote:
3. Minor unit balance issues: Like you said, the Fvost mechs that freeze units are the best, while the missionary and plague mech are useless. Why didn't they listen to you and make the missionary convert any unit? The missionary mech is insanely expensive, and has to get close to convert, so to be worth it he'd have to convert any unit. Right now he can only convert infantry and snipers. For the missionary's space and cost, I'd rather just have 6-9 addditional infantry. Re: the plague mech, he'd be worth it if every unit under his area of effect was guarenteed to get poisoned, but it seems there's only about a 25% chance of that, so you only end up poisoning about one unit per turn, which isn't worth it at all.
Agreed on both counts and in line to get fixed. Also: snipers are getting stronger, suicide bombers getting more powerful.
FABIO wrote:
I'd give priority to giving incentives to keep ground forces (since ground combat is the best aspect of the game) and changing the resource/upkeep model. Would it get you in trouble dropping your name at the official forum?
I don't think that's a problem but you might as well just keep it here, as all of this is going into my patch doc.
ktj |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
First review by Kthor 03/28/2005, 11:29am PST 
that review was horrible (patch suggestions) by FABIO 03/28/2005, 12:26pm PST 
one more suggestion by FABIO 03/28/2005, 12:44pm PST 
Re: that review was horrible (patch suggestions) by Kthor 03/28/2005, 1:17pm PST 
Re: First review by laudablepuss 03/28/2005, 2:36pm PST 
Wal-Mart, an even worse shopping option, typically does have Darko DC. by Bill Dungsroman 03/28/2005, 6:05pm PST 
I wouldn't sit through Underworld five times if it blew me afterwards. NT by extarbags 03/29/2005, 1:42pm PST 
You mean even the Veronica Cut won't sway you? Damn. by Bill Dungsroman 03/29/2005, 3:13pm PST 
Thanks a lot, you just ruined Christmas. by extarbags 03/29/2005, 5:02pm PST 
its so "hilariously bad" that its great huh? Wherever have i heard this before? by bombMexico 03/29/2005, 5:02pm PST 
Underworld better than Van Helsing? by extarbags 03/29/2005, 5:09pm PST 
Van helsing was supposed to be the Secret Wars of movie monsters by bombMexico 03/29/2005, 8:46pm PST 
Secret Wars II, dummy. NT by Kthor 03/30/2005, 9:21am PST 
LXG was still better than Underworld NT by FABIO 03/29/2005, 10:18pm PST 
Re: LXG was still better than Underworld by The Happiness Engine 03/30/2005, 10:46am PST 
LXG didn't make me want to slit my wrists like Underworld did. Win, Fatality by FABIO 03/30/2005, 11:38am PST 
Re: LXG didn't make me want to slit my wrists like Underworld did. Win, Fatality by The Happiness Engine 03/30/2005, 11:53am PST 
Plot tumors in Underworld, but not LXG? by extarbags 03/31/2005, 5:05pm PST 
You, sir, are no comic book fag. by Bill Dungsroman 03/31/2005, 7:21pm PST 
Re: You, sir, are no comic book fag. by FABIO 03/31/2005, 8:47pm PST 
The ugly truth by Mischief Maker 03/30/2005, 1:03am PST 
Re: The ugly truth by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/30/2005, 1:23am PST 
well, thats what special fx are for. Shes in a monster movie for chrissakes. by bombMexico 03/30/2005, 2:03am PST 
Your girlfriend referencing your bedroom proficiency? by Bill Dungsroman 03/30/2005, 9:39am PST 
more like YOUR girlfriend referencing my bedroom proficiency by bombMexico 03/31/2005, 1:14pm PST 
I guess that would be more theoretically possible, my gf being nonfictitious. by Bill Dungsroman 03/31/2005, 3:00pm PST 
haha-hey wait. Lets replace "nonfictitious" with "desperate." Realism achieved by bombMexico 03/31/2005, 7:24pm PST 
Yeah, let's. Hilarity will no doubt ensue. by Bill Dungsroman 03/31/2005, 8:26pm PST 
Re: its so "hilariously bad" that its great huh? Wherever have i heard this bef by Zseni: Warrior-Poet 03/30/2005, 10:35am PST 
I'm alright with going a long way for a little laugh by Entropy Stew 03/30/2005, 10:50am PST 
A+++ Would buy from again. NT by The Happiness Engine 03/30/2005, 11:06am PST 
This is a better about page than the about page NT by Ray of Light 03/30/2005, 11:52am PST 
Just like to say two things by laudablepuss 03/30/2005, 12:24pm PST 
What? NT by Everybody else 03/30/2005, 2:39pm PST 
That was both cogent and correct by Entropy Stew 03/30/2005, 3:16pm PST 
Re: That was both cogent and correct by Zseni: Warrior-Poet 03/30/2005, 7:17pm PST 
Re: That was both cogent and correct by laudablepuss 03/30/2005, 7:34pm PST 
Re: That was both cogent and correct by I need clarification 03/31/2005, 12:39am PST 
Re: That was both cogent and correct by laudablepuss 03/31/2005, 1:08am PST 
I smell cabbage NT by Entropy Stew 03/30/2005, 7:34pm PST 
oh dear, why all this attention! ah may faint *swoons* by bombMexico 03/30/2005, 8:11pm PST 
FUNNIEST GUY EVAR by laudablepuss 03/30/2005, 8:54pm PST 
Just answer the questions. You fill yours out and I'll fill out mine! NT by Zseni: Warrior-Poet 03/30/2005, 9:06pm PST 
Gameshark reviewing Supremacy by bombMexico 03/28/2005, 3:11pm PST 
anime-ish maybe by jeep 03/28/2005, 3:18pm PST 
Re: anime-ish maybe by Creexul :( 03/29/2005, 2:36pm PST 
Re: anime-ish maybe by Bill Dungsroman 03/29/2005, 2:40pm PST 
Re: Gameshark reviewing Supremacy by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/28/2005, 3:45pm PST 
|
|