Forum Overview :: Peter Molyneux's The Movies
 
Re: Spoilers by Lizard_King 07/20/2007, 8:53am PDT
Fussbett wrote:

Lizard_King wrote:

I'm talking about the world's worst escape plan, the world's worst coup plan (we'll sneak into prison, and then revolt from there where the government will surely be afraid to use the big guns on people it wants gone anyway), etc etc.

It was a refugee camp, not a prison, and they didn't want to revolt there, they wanted to escape to the boat which is off the coast of the coastal refugee camp. The coup Fish dudes didn't want them to try for the boat at all. One of us is misunderstanding things. Hopefully I've misunderstood you.

I'm well aware what they called it in the movie, but when "refugee camp" is the polite euphemism for what you are doing, something is wrong. Unless you're really excited about the British government and what they are doing in the movie, it is no more a "refugee camp" than Guantanamo, and a good deal worse.

I thought it was obvious that I was referring to the Fish and their coup plan in the second issue I mentioned. Since I doubt the government allows armed insurgents free transit in and out of the "camps", and it is unlikely they would fight their way in to fight their way out, I would imagine they snuck in as well. Which then brings us to their revolt plan, which hinges somehow on the government not taking the most expendable slice of its populace and slaughtering them out of hand. If their goal was to get the refugees killed right away instead of expelled from the country, good job.

I am also on board with understanding the Human Project's escape plan for the mother. I just happen to think I'd have a hard time coming up with a more unlikely, more needlessly dangerous rendezvous plan than that. Why not just pick them up in a taxi in front of No. 10 Downing?


If it's the world's greatest airport thriller, that's something though.

Yes, but it's something quite apart from Pan or Lives, for instance. Which is why I don't understand why someone would bring it up as a superior movie in a thread about either of the other two, and yet it keeps coming up. I can see the technical similarities and vague murmurs about dystopia, but that's about it.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
The Lives of Others by Quentin Beck 07/10/2007, 6:46pm PDT NEW
    Re: The Lives of Others by Zseni 07/10/2007, 6:51pm PDT NEW
        Re: The Lives of Others by Vested Id 07/10/2007, 6:58pm PDT NEW
            Re: The Lives of Others by Quentin Beck 07/10/2007, 9:17pm PDT NEW
    Wrong the best movie of the last 2 years is 300. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 07/10/2007, 7:43pm PDT NEW
        I thought it was "Never been Thawed" NT by Mischief Maker 07/10/2007, 7:48pm PDT NEW
            It will be "The King of Kong" NT by John Tidor 07/13/2007, 2:11pm PDT NEW
    I saw this in an arthouse cinema. [oblique spoilers] by Ray of Light 07/11/2007, 12:32am PDT NEW
        You're spoilers aren't oblique! You've ruined the movie for everyone! by Quentin Beck 07/11/2007, 8:11pm PDT NEW
            You're! NT by Quentin Beck 07/11/2007, 8:11pm PDT NEW
            Now THESE are spoilers by Ray of Light 07/12/2007, 7:06am PDT NEW
                Re: Now THESE are spoilers by Quentin Beck 07/12/2007, 7:44am PDT NEW
                    Re: Now THESE are spoilers by Jhoh Cable o_O 07/12/2007, 11:22am PDT NEW
                        Re: Now THESE are spoilers by Quentin Beck 07/12/2007, 6:19pm PDT NEW
                            I definitely have not seen this movie. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 07/12/2007, 7:46pm PDT NEW
                            Re: Now THESE are spoilers by Mischief Maker 07/13/2007, 5:41pm PDT NEW
    NOT better than Children of Men by Fussbett 07/13/2007, 1:03pm PDT NEW
        Re: NOT better than Children of Men by Lizard_King 07/13/2007, 1:54pm PDT NEW
            Re: NOT better than Children of Men by Ray of Light 07/14/2007, 12:34am PDT NEW
                Re: NOT better than Children of Men by Lizard_King 07/18/2007, 5:23am PDT NEW
        Re: NOT better than Children of Men by Quentin Beck 07/14/2007, 12:47am PDT NEW
        And it's definitely better than Children of Men. by Lizard_King 07/18/2007, 5:38am PDT NEW
            Children of Men, come for the fantastic cinematography by Fahbs 07/18/2007, 6:50am PDT NEW
                It definitely sets up for a video game. by Lizard_King 07/18/2007, 5:41pm PDT NEW
            Spoilers by Fussbett 07/18/2007, 5:47pm PDT NEW
                Re: Spoilers by Lizard_King 07/20/2007, 8:53am PDT NEW
                    Re: Spoilers by Fussbett 07/20/2007, 11:19am PDT NEW
                        Re: Spoilers by Lizard_King 07/20/2007, 4:39pm PDT NEW
                            Plan C by Fahbs 07/20/2007, 8:26pm PDT NEW
                                Re: Plan C by Lizard_King 07/21/2007, 8:37am PDT NEW
                            Lizard King has successfully agreed with me. Fussbett is dismissed. NT by Quentin Beck 07/20/2007, 11:27pm PDT NEW
                                You now like Pan's better than The Lives of Others? What a flip flop. NT by Fussbett 07/21/2007, 3:37am PDT NEW
                                    GET THE FUCK OUT! NT by Quentin Beck 07/21/2007, 6:30am PDT NEW
                                        You probably prefer Pan's Labyrinth because of the lack of artists in that film. NT by Fussbett 07/21/2007, 5:50pm PDT NEW
                                            Artists may be appreciated but should never be respected or admired. NT by Quentin Beck 07/24/2007, 5:58pm PDT NEW
                        Re: Spoilers by Leaped Frog 07/22/2007, 3:03pm PDT NEW
            It definitely had weak writing in a lot of parts by Fahbs 07/18/2007, 8:14pm PDT NEW
                I can't believe we agree on this (?!?) by Lizard_King 07/20/2007, 8:54am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy