|
by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:17pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Rabbi Friendly wrote:
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
1. Ad hominem attacks do nothing to earn you favor with any onlookers to this arguement, as for your personal tastes, I couldn't care less what you think of it, as long as you don't troll unprovoked, which is what my problem with the OP is. Based on what you said, however, I can see that you are quite arrogant. Arrogance isn't very nicely looked upon when you want to change other peoples' opinions, and I'd suggest that you take a little breather before you go insulting more people over the internet... because god knows it takes fifty swear words in one part of your arguement to get that feeling that the person on the recieving end has broken down in tears... guess what- I couldn't care less what some guy I don't even know thinks of me. Arrogant? What's with all the ad hominem? THOSE WON'T TRUCK TOO FAR IN ELEGANT DEBATE YOU MOTHERFUCKER. You know what? I'm skipping one since you seem to have admitted defeat on that point.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
2. Support your arguements with facts, not opinions.
Debate support alpha.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
Just because you think that the webcomic is shitty doesn't mean that other people do. QC is one of the more successful webcomics, having stayed at #1 at Buzzcomix for a few weeks before going in its hall of fame... tell me- Can a shitty comic accomplish that? Obviously can and did. HOLY SHIT WAIT A MINUTE DID YOU SAY BUZZCOMIX? That means less than nothing.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
skipping three, scince you seem to have admitted defeat on that point.
You completely destroyed me on on the topic of, "Why you came here in the first place." Yes.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
4. They are funny to make fun of, yes, but a good way to piss people off is to parody something they like with references to Adolf Hitler. I'd tell you to try it and watch as you get banned from whatever forum you do it at (I assume you have the common sense to not do that in public), but I'll see what you think of the idea first.
Who's rules are these? You will never get banned here, no matter what you say about anything. Is that ridiculous to you? Cool, express yourself. Do you mind if we do the same about your rules? We don't care if you do.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
5. I would assume the same way anybody else thinks. There could be bills to pay (assuming that the OP is an adult), he could go out and get some fresh air, tend to his social life (or if he is pathetic enough to lack one, he could get one.), or any other of the wonderful things he can (and probably does) do when he isn't trolling forums.
Who said he was trolling anyone?
1. Now you're just being silly. In debate, anyone's viewpoint, and anything you can do to sway people's opinion is fair game. I was only remarking on the effectiveness of one manner of debate. As for arrogance, you make assumptions without proof that they may possibly be correct.
2. Now that is something of interest. Yes, the supreme court decided that libel by parody is rediculous... that does not change the fact that he used J. Jaques's artwork (which is copyrighted), nor does it change the fact that nobody at the forum was impressed by what he did. All he got was dismissal and a couple of insults... not much of a trolling accomplishment.
4. I realize that these forums have no moderator, and no way of banning... I referred to the types of forums from which you can be banned, as the OP found out when he was unable to view the QC forums.
5. I say he was trolling, because he made this thread we currently post in (stating his obvious dislike for the comic), and also because he went on the comic's forums to see what sort of reactions he would get for the behavior he outlined in the first post of this thread. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by I need clarification 02/28/2007, 11:48pm PST 
Epic! Way to keep QCMerch up to the point of EXHAUSTION NT by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 12:00am PST 
My favorite kind of webcomic, where jokes aren't appreciated. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 1:20am PST 
I said "wow!" by Jerry Whorebach 03/01/2007, 1:31am PST 
I didn't work very hard on mine. :( by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 1:54am PST 
Any work of fiction improves when the characters all start talking like Creexul. NT by Tony 03/01/2007, 3:46pm PST 
yup, INC is definitely a father now by fatherhood curse 03/01/2007, 2:08am PST 
Holy shit, way to annouce your taste in cocks. NT by TENCHI? 03/01/2007, 2:14am PST 
Creexul knows of Tenchi, and he fucked Sassy. Have you? NT by fatherhood curse 03/01/2007, 2:20am PST 
High five? NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 2:40am PST 
He actually didn't, and everyone else did. Anything else? NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 12:00pm PST 
WE'RE STILL WORKING OUT THE TECHNICALITIES NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 10:02pm PST 
You created a whole screenname just to announce you suck. I'm proud of you, son. NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 2:37am PST 
Re: yup, INC is definitely a father now by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 10:59am PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 2:30pm PST 
You're an addict :( NT by mark 03/01/2007, 2:50pm PST 
But every junkie's like a settin' sun NT by Neil Young 03/01/2007, 2:54pm PST 
I hope the other QC fans don't show up... by Jerry Whorebach 03/01/2007, 2:51pm PST 
it's a novelty name. by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:00pm PST 
Re: it's a novelty name. by mark 03/01/2007, 3:04pm PST 
Monocle firmly in place here. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 10:13pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:04pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:18pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:35pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:53pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 4:14pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:17pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 8:36pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 8:46pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Neil Young 03/01/2007, 9:01pm PST 
ad homiWHAT? by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 9:23pm PST 
your retort is like swiss cheese- it's full of holes NT by Flabby-o 03/02/2007, 2:57am PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 9:45pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 9:10pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 11:27pm PST 
Your Ad hominem attacks do nothing to earn you favor with me! >:( NT by Mischief Onlooker 03/01/2007, 6:35pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 4:40pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:22pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:25pm PST 
I was wondering how you would respond, and I said to myself - Double Post! NT by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 8:38pm PST 
It was a connection problem. by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 8:41pm PST 
Well, we're probably going to ban you for that. NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 9:05pm PST 
You read my (fucking) mind. NT by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 10:52pm PST 
Please cut to the case by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/01/2007, 9:36pm PST 
My connection was a bit problematic at the time I was NT by in bed 03/01/2007, 10:00pm PST 
Please stop trying NT by it only makes you more of an idiot 03/03/2007, 3:29am PST 
Is there an undeleted thread over there about this? by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/03/2007, 3:15pm PST 
There might just be. by mark 03/03/2007, 4:23pm PST 
Re: There might just be. by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/03/2007, 6:52pm PST 
Re: There might just be. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/04/2007, 12:06am PST 
That guy joined here yesterday (sunglasses) and was banned immediately. NT by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/04/2007, 2:05pm PST 
YEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGHH! NT by Schadenfreude 03/04/2007, 3:42pm PST 
Furry Furrier. Heh by The Shadow of Anonymity 03/03/2007, 10:57pm PST 
Mark needs to post those logs NT by Flavio 03/19/2007, 2:51am PDT 
If only clapstro had more threads like this. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/20/2007, 3:31am PDT 
A small, maybe funny portion by mark 03/21/2007, 1:53pm PDT 
Is INC's name really Ben Stein? by Stroker Ace (Posts: 4,530) 03/21/2007, 2:18pm PDT 
I'M COMING TO HIS HOUSE TO KILL HIM RIGHT NOW by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/21/2007, 4:52pm PDT 
Alex NT by MobyGames 03/22/2007, 3:04am PDT 
Re: Alex by laudablepuss 03/22/2007, 2:53pm PDT 
Hey now. NT by Herb Goldfarb 03/22/2007, 3:09pm PDT 
JJJJJJaques finally gives in to INC's terrorist demands? by Swiss Cheese 03/23/2007, 1:19pm PDT 
BURN on you! by Mischief Maker 03/27/2007, 9:28am PDT 
Serves you right for forgetting to check the file size of an image before upload NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/27/2007, 10:12am PDT 
They shut the forum down on January 1st, 2023 NT by Ichabod 07/10/2023, 9:17pm PDT 
Anyone have the full size of the picture in this? by jauwh 04/09/2013, 10:38am PDT 
Adventures of attempting to recreate. by jauwh 04/09/2013, 11:55am PDT 
Adoft Adolf WHATEVER NT by jauwh 04/09/2013, 12:07pm PDT 
Re: Adventures of attempting to recreate. by laudablepuss 04/09/2013, 12:35pm PDT 
Also, it's "heebs" :) NT by laudablepuss 04/09/2013, 12:43pm PDT 
Re: Adventures of attempting to recreate. by Mysterios 04/09/2013, 5:44pm PDT 
"Dining at the V" NT by V for Vagina 04/09/2013, 2:03pm PDT 
^^Shut-in alert^^ NT by Mysterio 04/09/2013, 2:18pm PDT 
It's Y as in YMCA (young men's christian association). by jauwh 04/09/2013, 11:02pm PDT 
Here;s how it looks these days. by Ichabod 07/25/2020, 10:09pm PDT 
It passes the techno-Bechdel test by y-You're Beautiful 07/26/2020, 9:47am PDT 
Something that might be lost in the post of the AIM log by Mysterio 07/10/2023, 9:26pm PDT 
Like Penny Arcade, this got too awful to even make fun of anymore by wacky robo trannies 07/11/2023, 1:04am PDT 
This is very much giving the same vibe nortverse.com NT by Ichabod 12/06/2023, 6:47pm PST 
|
|