Rabbi Friendly wrote:

AnotherQCaddict wrote:

1. well, they broke up... I imagine it would be hard to bone someone who is an ex,

I do not CLOSELY follow the sad soap operatic antics of your beloved fictional personalities. You realize that they are constructs of a dull and emotionally retarded mind, don't you? I know you do, because I TOLD YOU SO. If you want to hop around like a silly faggot pointing out the fallacy in my argument because I don't follow this shitty comic, fine, but my point stands: Why is endless bantering about "polite" feelings more satisfying to you than a taking on the aftermath of a nice violent fuck that resolves with screaming and punching and animal clawing and plenty of ugly feelings that feel so fucking good and are never discussed by "polite" faggots over latte? Which is more interesting to you? Guess which is more interesting to ME.

AnotherQCaddict wrote:

also... I was making that point to be more of a pedant and reveal that there are flaws in his arguement, so instead of forming my own arguement, I attempted to destroy his by showing how his is much like swiss cheese- full of holes.

Well, fuck, you failed utterly. Why would you point that out? The same reason you read that shitty comic, you hate yourself and don't feel like you deserve better. Maybe you don't?

AnotherQCaddict wrote:

2. He copyrighted the artwork, and the artwork is used. While parody, he's using the copyrighted artwork.

Yes, I understood you the first time, because your point was simple, stupid and wrong. Parody is exempt from the threat of copyright legal action. This is a supreme court "free speech" ruling, in THEORY you claim to support this, though you obviously don't understand it. (Admit it though, the thought of a huge black cock pummeling your sweetheart's cunt was pretty hot, wasn't it?)

AnotherQCaddict wrote:

3. I came here because somebody linked this "wonderful" thread in the forum, and I decided to argue the point and perhaps shed the light of reason on the OP.

Okay.

AnotherQCaddict wrote:

4. I was merely pointing out that it may have been a bit unwise of him to post a parody of a thread which portrays the characters as nazis in a community of forumgoers built on said comic... Now, I don't like nazis. The community that I speak on behalf of doesn't like nazis. Do you like nazis?

Nazi's are also hilarious, are you pointing out that you know two funny things? That's very nice.

AnotherQCaddict wrote:

5. I called him an asshat because he went trolling around the forums, he obviously had nothing better to do, now did he?