|
by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:35pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
1. well, they broke up... I imagine it would be hard to bone someone who is an ex, I do not CLOSELY follow the sad soap operatic antics of your beloved fictional personalities. You realize that they are constructs of a dull and emotionally retarded mind, don't you? I know you do, because I TOLD YOU SO. If you want to hop around like a silly faggot pointing out the fallacy in my argument because I don't follow this shitty comic, fine, but my point stands: Why is endless bantering about "polite" feelings more satisfying to you than a taking on the aftermath of a nice violent fuck that resolves with screaming and punching and animal clawing and plenty of ugly feelings that feel so fucking good and are never discussed by "polite" faggots over latte? Which is more interesting to you? Guess which is more interesting to ME.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
also... I was making that point to be more of a pedant and reveal that there are flaws in his arguement, so instead of forming my own arguement, I attempted to destroy his by showing how his is much like swiss cheese- full of holes. Well, fuck, you failed utterly. Why would you point that out? The same reason you read that shitty comic, you hate yourself and don't feel like you deserve better. Maybe you don't?
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
2. He copyrighted the artwork, and the artwork is used. While parody, he's using the copyrighted artwork. Yes, I understood you the first time, because your point was simple, stupid and wrong. Parody is exempt from the threat of copyright legal action. This is a supreme court "free speech" ruling, in THEORY you claim to support this, though you obviously don't understand it. (Admit it though, the thought of a huge black cock pummeling your sweetheart's cunt was pretty hot, wasn't it?)
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
3. I came here because somebody linked this "wonderful" thread in the forum, and I decided to argue the point and perhaps shed the light of reason on the OP. Okay.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
4. I was merely pointing out that it may have been a bit unwise of him to post a parody of a thread which portrays the characters as nazis in a community of forumgoers built on said comic... Now, I don't like nazis. The community that I speak on behalf of doesn't like nazis. Do you like nazis? Nazi's are also hilarious, are you pointing out that you know two funny things? That's very nice.
AnotherQCaddict wrote:
5. I called him an asshat because he went trolling around the forums, he obviously had nothing better to do, now did he?
I have no idea what he thinks is better to do than laughing at you. He's a Jew. Who the fuck know how THOSE PEOPLE think? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by I need clarification 02/28/2007, 11:48pm PST 
Epic! Way to keep QCMerch up to the point of EXHAUSTION NT by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 12:00am PST 
My favorite kind of webcomic, where jokes aren't appreciated. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 1:20am PST 
I said "wow!" by Jerry Whorebach 03/01/2007, 1:31am PST 
I didn't work very hard on mine. :( by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 1:54am PST 
Any work of fiction improves when the characters all start talking like Creexul. NT by Tony 03/01/2007, 3:46pm PST 
yup, INC is definitely a father now by fatherhood curse 03/01/2007, 2:08am PST 
Holy shit, way to annouce your taste in cocks. NT by TENCHI? 03/01/2007, 2:14am PST 
Creexul knows of Tenchi, and he fucked Sassy. Have you? NT by fatherhood curse 03/01/2007, 2:20am PST 
High five? NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 2:40am PST 
He actually didn't, and everyone else did. Anything else? NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 12:00pm PST 
WE'RE STILL WORKING OUT THE TECHNICALITIES NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 10:02pm PST 
You created a whole screenname just to announce you suck. I'm proud of you, son. NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 2:37am PST 
Re: yup, INC is definitely a father now by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 10:59am PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 2:30pm PST 
You're an addict :( NT by mark 03/01/2007, 2:50pm PST 
But every junkie's like a settin' sun NT by Neil Young 03/01/2007, 2:54pm PST 
I hope the other QC fans don't show up... by Jerry Whorebach 03/01/2007, 2:51pm PST 
it's a novelty name. by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:00pm PST 
Re: it's a novelty name. by mark 03/01/2007, 3:04pm PST 
Monocle firmly in place here. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/01/2007, 10:13pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:04pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:18pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 3:35pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 3:53pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 4:14pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:17pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 8:36pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 8:46pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Neil Young 03/01/2007, 9:01pm PST 
ad homiWHAT? by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 9:23pm PST 
your retort is like swiss cheese- it's full of holes NT by Flabby-o 03/02/2007, 2:57am PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 9:45pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Fussbett 03/01/2007, 9:10pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 11:27pm PST 
Your Ad hominem attacks do nothing to earn you favor with me! >:( NT by Mischief Onlooker 03/01/2007, 6:35pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 4:40pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:22pm PST 
Re: REVIEW: Questionable Content (www.questionablecontent.net) by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 7:25pm PST 
I was wondering how you would respond, and I said to myself - Double Post! NT by Web comix guy 03/01/2007, 8:38pm PST 
It was a connection problem. by AnotherQCaddict 03/01/2007, 8:41pm PST 
Well, we're probably going to ban you for that. NT by I need clarification 03/01/2007, 9:05pm PST 
You read my (fucking) mind. NT by Rabbi Friendly 03/01/2007, 10:52pm PST 
Please cut to the case by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/01/2007, 9:36pm PST 
My connection was a bit problematic at the time I was NT by in bed 03/01/2007, 10:00pm PST 
Please stop trying NT by it only makes you more of an idiot 03/03/2007, 3:29am PST 
Is there an undeleted thread over there about this? by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/03/2007, 3:15pm PST 
There might just be. by mark 03/03/2007, 4:23pm PST 
Re: There might just be. by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/03/2007, 6:52pm PST 
Re: There might just be. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/04/2007, 12:06am PST 
That guy joined here yesterday (sunglasses) and was banned immediately. NT by motherfuckerfoodeater 03/04/2007, 2:05pm PST 
YEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGHH! NT by Schadenfreude 03/04/2007, 3:42pm PST 
Furry Furrier. Heh by The Shadow of Anonymity 03/03/2007, 10:57pm PST 
Mark needs to post those logs NT by Flavio 03/19/2007, 2:51am PDT 
If only clapstro had more threads like this. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/20/2007, 3:31am PDT 
A small, maybe funny portion by mark 03/21/2007, 1:53pm PDT 
Is INC's name really Ben Stein? by Stroker Ace (Posts: 4,530) 03/21/2007, 2:18pm PDT 
I'M COMING TO HIS HOUSE TO KILL HIM RIGHT NOW by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/21/2007, 4:52pm PDT 
Alex NT by MobyGames 03/22/2007, 3:04am PDT 
Re: Alex by laudablepuss 03/22/2007, 2:53pm PDT 
Hey now. NT by Herb Goldfarb 03/22/2007, 3:09pm PDT 
JJJJJJaques finally gives in to INC's terrorist demands? by Swiss Cheese 03/23/2007, 1:19pm PDT 
BURN on you! by Mischief Maker 03/27/2007, 9:28am PDT 
Serves you right for forgetting to check the file size of an image before upload NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/27/2007, 10:12am PDT 
They shut the forum down on January 1st, 2023 NT by Ichabod 07/10/2023, 9:17pm PDT 
Anyone have the full size of the picture in this? by jauwh 04/09/2013, 10:38am PDT 
Adventures of attempting to recreate. by jauwh 04/09/2013, 11:55am PDT 
Adoft Adolf WHATEVER NT by jauwh 04/09/2013, 12:07pm PDT 
Re: Adventures of attempting to recreate. by laudablepuss 04/09/2013, 12:35pm PDT 
Also, it's "heebs" :) NT by laudablepuss 04/09/2013, 12:43pm PDT 
Re: Adventures of attempting to recreate. by Mysterios 04/09/2013, 5:44pm PDT 
"Dining at the V" NT by V for Vagina 04/09/2013, 2:03pm PDT 
^^Shut-in alert^^ NT by Mysterio 04/09/2013, 2:18pm PDT 
It's Y as in YMCA (young men's christian association). by jauwh 04/09/2013, 11:02pm PDT 
Here;s how it looks these days. by Ichabod 07/25/2020, 10:09pm PDT 
It passes the techno-Bechdel test by y-You're Beautiful 07/26/2020, 9:47am PDT 
Something that might be lost in the post of the AIM log by Mysterio 07/10/2023, 9:26pm PDT 
Like Penny Arcade, this got too awful to even make fun of anymore by wacky robo trannies 07/11/2023, 1:04am PDT 
This is very much giving the same vibe nortverse.com NT by Ichabod 12/06/2023, 6:47pm PST 
|
|