Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News
 
Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by laudablepuss 02/21/2003, 6:24pm PST
Motherhead wrote:

I thought the original point was that terrorists could no longer use a 747 as a serious piece of ordnance. The AWACS and F-16's that still patrol the skies above major metro areas? They are not looking out for Talibani Mirage Jets; they are waiting for the command to obliterate a passenger jet at 18,000 feet.

Yes, say a loaded plane with 250+ people went down, that is bad. Though not as bad as that plane being slammed into a dense population center or targeted structure.

Remember that we are not just talking about airport security; we are talking about the Big Brother Intelligence community that is eyeballing anyone that has even entered a mosque and the even more effective post catastrophe investigation. Moving around your suicidal fags and seeing that whatever compensation needed is provided requires logistics. With a simple flex of imagination one could envision better ways to kill more people with less vulnerability to assets. This is a game concept now.

As for why: Ideology and martyrs are as old as tribal warfare man. The gods, flags and rhetoric changes but the condition is innately human.


Did you see the link posted by Alternate789? The question is, why was it EVER possible to use a 747 as a guided missile? Why did ANY of those hijacked planes make it to their targets?
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Bill Dungsroman 02/19/2003, 12:52pm PST NEW
    Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by niche 02/19/2003, 1:08pm PST NEW
        Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Bill Dungsroman 02/19/2003, 1:59pm PST NEW
            Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by niche 02/19/2003, 2:30pm PST NEW
                Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Ice Cream Jonsey 02/19/2003, 3:01pm PST NEW
                    Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by niche 02/19/2003, 3:49pm PST NEW
                        Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Tom-Foolery Constructor 02/19/2003, 6:05pm PST NEW
                        Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Motherhead 02/20/2003, 4:08am PST NEW
                            Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by laudablepuss 02/21/2003, 6:24pm PST NEW
                                Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Bodybag 02/21/2003, 6:42pm PST NEW
                                    Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by laudablepuss 02/21/2003, 8:44pm PST NEW
                                        Re: FAA to Bin Laden: Thanks by Motherhead 02/22/2003, 3:20am PST NEW
    Let's not forget F-16s by conflictNo 02/19/2003, 2:32pm PST NEW
        Re: Let's not forget F-16s by theboywolfie 02/19/2003, 4:11pm PST NEW
            Even in death I am considerate. (nt) by conflictNo 02/19/2003, 4:15pm PST NEW
        I wouldn't be so optomistic by Alternate789 02/19/2003, 4:29pm PST NEW
            geez by FABIO 02/19/2003, 8:20pm PST NEW
    It took you a year and a half to figure this out? -nt- by E. L. Koba 02/19/2003, 11:16pm PST NEW
        You're a fag, find out why inside! by Bill Dungsroman 02/20/2003, 11:46am PST NEW
            Counterpoints: Suicide Shoes + weapons still being found in random checks -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/20/2003, 4:34pm PST NEW
                Fair, but catching people only works to discourage that avenue of attack -nt- NT by Bill Dungsroman 02/20/2003, 5:53pm PST NEW
                    blowing up planes mid-air is still a realistic tactic for terrorists by FABIO 02/20/2003, 8:46pm PST NEW
                        Re: blowing up planes mid-air is still a realistic tactic for terrorists by theboywolfie 02/21/2003, 5:11pm PST NEW
            No you are the one who is a fag! by E. L. Koba 02/21/2003, 10:30pm PST NEW
                You are a god. -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 02/22/2003, 1:37pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy