Bill Dungsroman wrote:

Zseni wrote:

You're totally insane, for starters. I mean starkers. INC is right (in more than just the fact that he agrees with me):

No, it pretty much ends there for the both of you. Time was, INC had his own opinions, and they were pretty fucking spot-on. Now: just some me-too queerleading. He doesn't even read your posts, incidentally.

Zseni wrote:

you're an angry, angry man, so angry that you haven't been having any fun here for oh I'd say about a year now.

You mean, since I became admin? Ookay! GameFAGs assault: not fun. Clowning on you: not fun. Football, RPG deconstructions, troll-smashing, Barborito-crunching: all SOOOO not fun. Oh, and anger-inducing, I forgot that. So mad. Growl.

Zseni wrote:

Your memory IS faulty. Your troll post brought up two examples of this:
1. Fussbett's FUCK YOU post. Never happened,

Yes it did, more times than I invoked Godwin's Law (but over a longer period of time)

Zseni wrote:

and what's worse is that it is completely unlikely to boot.

It happened many a time. It happened when he got one-upped on Leisuretown. It prompted me to joke (back then) that some forums should be renamed: Site Comments should become BDR Sucks by The Internet, Gamerasutra should be I Suck at This Game by FABIO, and NEWS should be Fuck You by Fussbett. Lost to the ether, more is the pity.

Zseni wrote:

Fussbett has the coolest jets here, chief, and has had them for a considerable time. He doesn't even post unless he's got forms countersigned in triplicate from his post excellence engineers.

Which is why it's of singular note when he gets riled. It is totally against type, which is why I always noted it.

Zseni wrote:

2. Zseni's PURPLE JUNTA RAGE. Remember what that was about? No, it wasn't a tantrum! It was Zseni saying she would like articles and article editing to be in the forums, and if they weren't in the forums she wouldn't like to be a part of them.

And all that was, you spastic cunt, yet you saw fit to blast us all via email before a decision had even been made. Additionally, what a fucking dumbass reason to excommunicate yourself for the email list. The lookitme! histrionics of that event evidently still to this day completely escape you. Funnier still as it was essentially a smaller-scale FitM war that you likewise preemptively waged on us.

Zseni wrote:

Zseni was writing herself out of the Purple Junta, and you were most vocal about it!

If coming to caltrops and announcing that having a forum to workshop articles was going to be instituted and was a great idea, and fully crediting you with it is the vocality of which you speak, then guilty as charged. What that has to do with you having to be a screeching maniacal harpy when we were already heading towards a Yes vote is beyond all of us. Excpet that it makes you insane that your vote might only count as one (1) among a group. Zsenii potentially outvoted on an issue? AAAAAGH I QUIT! Fucking weak, sister.

Zseni wrote:

But but but but in your last explosive shitheap, the "troll" post, you expressly claimed you MISSED watching me YAMMER PEOPLE INTO THE GROUND. What, in your hazy halcyon fever-dreams of Caltrops yore, did you think that looked like, exactly? Someone getting totally humiliated by their own stupidity, with me as commentator? You're looking at that one right now.

But but but you just in the post above apologized TO ME for being a diluted version of the former you. Hence, disappointment.

Zseni wrote:

Well no, you aren't using it, because it's out of your personal control.

Hey, if we really get a caltrops/wikipedia off the ground, when it's all we can do to get the basic caltrops version running, I'm all for it. But, we won't. What's your point?

Zseni wrote:

You mean those people are making fun of me?

BTW I cannot believe you're so anal-retentive that you typed in the name="Zseni" for each and every quoted section. Tell me you cut and pasted, at least.

Christ. Ask another dumb question.

Zseni wrote:

Seconds ago you were protesting my libel against the faultless working of your memory, and here you are squandering your most priceless virtue: your reputation for honest self-examination. BDR, really, I'm not worth it.

And I thought that virtue was boring and ridiculous? Or whatever words you used, my FAULTLESS PHOTOGRAPHIC MEMORY fails me again.

Zseni wrote:

You know, I was a pioneer in the not-putting-Caltrops-into-the-hands-of-lunatics movement, and I got a lot of shit for it then.

You got a lot of shit for GRANNY SPAM, dipshit.

Zseni wrote:

I don't expect that shit to stop coming down the line for it now that Lead Psycho Apologist is frothing at the best regulars and proclaiming everywhere that Caltrops is his site. A user admin! His site!

It was a joke post; you fell for it. Notice Creexul did not. "Everywhere" in this instance appears to be Qt3, where I call it my site immediately preceding a lengthy explanation of what my actual part in the site is, while - oh no, the coup de grace! - curiously omitting that I'm an admin here!

Getting tipsy off plum brandy? Truly, thou dost forge untrod ground brazenly.

Is it still grandstanding if no one is around to be annoyed by it?

#1, at the TOP of the page. Are you still hitting the plum brandy or something?

Zseni wrote:

Self-censure what? Your personal ongoing life trauma is an open book thanks to your demonstrable inability to keep your minute-to-minute emotional status out of your posts.

Then go for it: rip me open with all my life happenings over the last 12 months.

Zseni wrote:

Yes, you certainly have, along with a Hunter S. Thompson-style laundry list of hard and heavy recreational (and vocational!) drugs. On the count of me not being half the scary drug-abusing felon you are, I find me: guilty as charged.

A second ago you were an interpid adventurer recounting your lurid tales of intoxication, now you're (more appropriately) Polly Prissypants re-arranging tea cozies and tsking the misadventures of the riff-raff.

Zseni wrote:

Let me spell this out for him, for there is none so blind as he who will not see: you see, BDR? You think I'm talking about you even when I'm talking about someone completely different, and then - when I actually AM talking about you, you think I'm talking about someone else! Because you're stone cold nuts!

Do I need to list every post you mention me in? It's every single one. You mention me at the end of that one. Also, the point I'm making is projection, as in the psychological behavior. You reek of it.

Zseni wrote:

You totally believed "SB" when "he" "told you" that I had posted several anonymous criticisms of you.

Nope. I just figured it out easily enough on my own. He was talking about you atoring in arguments with him. You, sucking OGF's cock as Zseni and then in an anonynmous slam on me. And so on.

Zseni wrote:

Criticisms, you later whined, that "hurt", criticisms you "knew" had to come from "me." Only they didn't, and you are particularly bad at picking out my ATORs - happily replying to Hobo, for example, when Hobo posts apologetic praise to you using my nick, and happily indicting totally unrelated ATORs as being my work. Of course most of that stuff is gone now, along with the rest of Old Caltrops.

I whined. You begged me to go to AIM and pleaded that I never reply to you anymore.

Zseni wrote:

Likewise I'm not trying to trick you into doing anything here. You're just paranoid. Clinically? Dunno, but you have to be getting close to it by now.

Lazy, perhaps. I see you mentioning me nonstop, I make a tactical error. Indeed, mea culpa. What does any of that have to do with you being boring and stupid?

Zseni wrote:

Well, I was being a bit flip since we all know your drug of choice is cocaine.

What?

Neither are most of the people here. But, as usual, it's my fault either way.

Re: the bolded part: it's part of your problem.

Wow, that was a weak dodge.

No, I shoot heroin! Into my eyeballs for lack of patent vessels!

Late-breaking news to up your drinking 1337ness! Also, who fucking cares, back to my original point.

Ad hominems, ad nauseum.

Zseni wrote:

Your responses don't validate anything but the level and intensity of your "annoyance": high, and tight. Indirectly you are giving the signal that my criticism is something you take more personally than you take the average poster's, therefore there's something special about either it or me. I'm sorry, dummy, but there is no magic post vortex that sucks up your motivation for responding and replaces it with "totally chill conversation for fun."

Then you're likewise, hooray for the both of us. Except, somehow you're "magically" not, I'm assuming.

Zseni wrote:

I don't think you're bored with me. You're reading most of - if not all - my posts and you respond to some of them at considerable length. You keep bringing up Binro like it's a meaningful comparison, but Binro was and is a genuinely sick individual who had and has a compulsion to post in a place that would punish him for doing so. At the present moment you are much closer to that line than I am: admitting hurt, and "annoyance", and anger, and continuing to return to the source(s) of those negative emotions.

Wow, this dodge will never get told with you. Yes Zseni, you automatically win when I respond to you, the same as every troll ever of any sublevel of intellect. I read all the janitor's posts, too.

Zseni wrote:

I wanted Caltrops out of SB's hands because he was generally unreliable and prone to misusing his administrative powers. I want Caltrops out of your hands because you can't take it here anymore, and I think it's only a matter of time before you crack and do yourself some permanent damage. You will no doubt respond, either here or to yourself, with a mass of excuses and protestations that you were just trolling or kidding or it's a big joke or I'm pulling some kind of savior act. But I don't mind pushing you over the edge just to watch you fall, for starters, and after that you should consider why you're so immensely defensive. Maybe you don't want to admit that reason to me or to anyone else on here, but if you can't admit it to yourself then you have a serious problem and you need to, at the very least, take a good long break from this site and get your head screwed on straight again.

Yeah, not really. Your rhetoric notwithstanding.

Zseni wrote:

I don't need to lecture you on obsessive-compulsive behavior, BDR. You know the symptoms and signs, but you might not realize that you're presenting them. You are.

Okay.