|
by wherever 08/09/2004, 1:43pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zseni wrote:
Bill Dungsroman wrote:
Zseni wrote:
Your "troll" post: generated some serious discussion about how your memory is faulty and your credentials as an admin were questionable. Also about whether or not you were trolling. My memory isn't faulty, and only you questioned my "credentials" as admin (besides INC, but since he posts in blind support of you with every post you make, because he's a boresome faggot, he doesn't count). Credentials, I again add, that I have had for going on nearly a year now, that you are only now clamoring for the revokation of because you finally found out about them. Not because there has ever been any evidence to base your claims on, beyond the fact that I annoy you and you me.
You're totally insane, for starters. I mean starkers. INC is right (in more than just the fact that he agrees with me): you're an angry, angry man, so angry that you haven't been having any fun here for oh I'd say about a year now.
Your memory IS faulty. Your troll post brought up two examples of this:
1. Fussbett's FUCK YOU post. Never happened, and what's worse is that it is completely unlikely to boot. Fussbett has the coolest jets here, chief, and has had them for a considerable time. He doesn't even post unless he's got forms countersigned in triplicate from his post excellence engineers.
2. Zseni's PURPLE JUNTA RAGE. Remember what that was about? No, it wasn't a tantrum! It was Zseni saying she would like articles and article editing to be in the forums, and if they weren't in the forums she wouldn't like to be a part of them. Zseni was writing herself out of the Purple Junta, and you were most vocal about it!
Zseni wrote:
My typical everyday post: beats away Ray, Oh God, are you really claiming yourself FORUM WINNAR 4-EVA because Ray has gone back to lurking? You both yammered each other into the ground. You post more about different things, and thus you are the winner. Oh, there's Ray, BTW. Did anyone inform him that you soundly trounced him awhile back? I'm not sure he knows, which is always a sure sign of abject defeat. Hate to break it to you, but nobody around here is golf-clapping your performance in the titanic Ray vs. Zseni bout for your fourth round KO.
But but but but in your last explosive shitheap, the "troll" post, you expressly claimed you MISSED watching me YAMMER PEOPLE INTO THE GROUND. What, in your hazy halcyon fever-dreams of Caltrops yore, did you think that looked like, exactly? Someone getting totally humiliated by their own stupidity, with me as commentator? You're looking at that one right now.
Zseni wrote:
starts new dimension of forum communication, Wikipedia? You did not invent it (obviously), and we're not using it.
Well no, you aren't using it, because it's out of your personal control.
Zseni wrote:
stimulates variety of me too posts on the subject of alcohol consumption. Even Binro knew when he was being mocked.
You mean those people are making fun of me?
BTW I cannot believe you're so anal-retentive that you typed in the name="Zseni" for each and every quoted section. Tell me you cut and pasted, at least.
Zseni wrote:
Your "I'm bored" post: generates disgust, apathy. I notice the Half Life 2 mod review went right up after it. Sure, that had nothing to do with me, likewise nothing has anything to do with you either.
I can't argue with logic like that!
Zseni wrote:
My "I'm bored" post: stimulates apologetics and sharing of social wisdom. I see Creexul telling you to fuck off, me telling you to fuck off, ES telling you to shut up, and Ray, me, FABIO, lp, and MM making fun of you and pointing out the futility of it. But, okay!
Seconds ago you were protesting my libel against the faultless working of your memory, and here you are squandering your most priceless virtue: your reputation for honest self-examination. BDR, really, I'm not worth it.
Zseni wrote:
Your longwindedness: an obvious guise for your lack of content. Appreciated by bottomfeeding admin suckups and nobody else. Make some sense, you dim twat. You're tossing any ol' shit you thunk up at me, and it's pretty limp. "Admin suckups." PLACATE ME OR I WILL BAN YOU! Yeah, that's the subtext. You've currently mentioned my admin status about 20 more times than myself and anyone else here has. The problem, as always, is solely yours.
You know, I was a pioneer in the not-putting-Caltrops-into-the-hands-of-lunatics movement, and I got a lot of shit for it then. I don't expect that shit to stop coming down the line for it now that Lead Psycho Apologist is frothing at the best regulars and proclaiming everywhere that Caltrops is his site. A user admin! His site!
Zseni wrote:
My longwindedness: required by the depth and complexity of my thoughts. Admired by the fearless few who don't instantly go to pieces when confronted with people who disagree with them. Depth and complexity example #1: The Weaponsmith informs me that drunk does not mean stupid but I do feel a bit...slower. Do some of you guys feel like this all the time? Wow, simply yawnawe-inspiring, that. Deep Thinker Does Shots. Lick salt first, or suck lime wedge? Truly, these are conflicts of the ages, handled best by the supremest of learned literati.
So often genius is mistaken for pretentious pablum by those who have not the wit nor education to understand it. But do you elect to learn, or to scoff loudly with your braying donkey "friends" at the brave soldier of truth who speaks a language that you cannot yet comprehend?
One may speak all the wisdom of the ages to a dog, but the dog only recognizes the sound of its name. I think this is why you jump all over me for mentioning your name, and have nothing at all to say about the priceless pearls of knowledge I scatter hither and yon across this forum.
Zseni wrote:
Your self-disclosure: extensive, unnecessary, depressing. My articles rode the TOP of google for months, cuntbag. Furthermore, my self-censure has been going on nearly a full year (just like my Admin status!). Keep sniffing up old leads, Deputy Dawg.
What does "TOP of google" even mean, you crazy crazy person? Self-censure what? Your personal ongoing life trauma is an open book thanks to your demonstrable inability to keep your minute-to-minute emotional status out of your posts.
Zseni wrote:
My self-disclosure: entertaining, train-wrecky, inspiring. So was Binro's. You're in quite the distinguished league. Also: utterly non-inspiring. We've been drinking for decades, Sunshine, long before you dipped your tentative tootsies in the vice.
Yes, you certainly have, along with a Hunter S. Thompson-style laundry list of hard and heavy recreational (and vocational!) drugs. On the count of me not being half the scary drug-abusing felon you are, I find me: guilty as charged.
Zseni wrote:
Your analytical abilities: routinely taking other posters to be me and my posts about other posters to be about you. Used most often to cover up your fears and insecurities, including the number of ways you are afraid you don't measure up to me. Frequently misrepresents past events to cast them in light more favorable to your paranoia. Whoops, I thought you were talking about me.
Ladies and gentlemen, he's writing this stuff, not me. I didn't even change a letter of that one.
Let me spell this out for him, for there is none so blind as he who will not see: you see, BDR? You think I'm talking about you even when I'm talking about someone completely different, and then - when I actually AM talking about you, you think I'm talking about someone else! Because you're stone cold nuts!
Zseni wrote:
My analytical abilities: lengthy track record of SB-outing, ATOR-discerning, and personal insight leading to enlightenment, strength, and willingness to give and take. That will all look good on your resume, or something. What the fuck are you babbling about? As if suddenly, all the house lights dim, save one lone spotlight on our heroine, as she belts out a marvelous ditty that has all the fans in tears and cheering. Or, crickets. Certainly, claim that you never Ator, oh except the one time SB checked IPs and caught you, never any other time, because that's motherfucking plausible, hoping against hope I'll check them out of paranoid rage and then you can catch me catching you or whatever, because you're so unbelievably sly and two steps ahead of us all. And then, of course, that will be the only other time you've Atored.
You totally believed "SB" when "he" "told you" that I had posted several anonymous criticisms of you. Criticisms, you later whined, that "hurt", criticisms you "knew" had to come from "me." Only they didn't, and you are particularly bad at picking out my ATORs - happily replying to Hobo, for example, when Hobo posts apologetic praise to you using my nick, and happily indicting totally unrelated ATORs as being my work. Of course most of that stuff is gone now, along with the rest of Old Caltrops.
Likewise I'm not trying to trick you into doing anything here. You're just paranoid. Clinically? Dunno, but you have to be getting close to it by now.
Zseni wrote:
Your capacity for drink: poor. It's obvious when you've been drinking, and you do an awful lot of drinking. Tell me the last time I did, then. You have no idea what you're talking about. First hunting, now fishing. How Butch.
Well, I was being a bit flip since we all know your drug of choice is cocaine. But short of that I would say you're drunk...a lot! Because you're irrationally angry and no longer able to tell when people are joking or not; because you have problems handling your Caltrops; because you're replying in horrible earnestness to a post that was 90% obvious mockery to 10% well-worn truth. Who knows what your other substance abuse problems are? I think I saw an episode of Law And Order like this, but I'm pretty sure that within five years you are engaging in illegal organ transactions with international crime lords in order to score your fixes.
Zseni wrote:
My capacity for drink: vast,
Zseni wrote:
It has just taken 12 shots of slivovica to accomplish this.
I'm proud that I do have a limit. Ooh, a regular Dean Martin, we have here.
PLUM BRANDY. What a Bubblegummer. Come back when you can drink something with balls on it.
Hey I'm not stupid, I watched Poltergeist 2.
You no doubt can down 12 shots of anything without even thinking about it, on one count because you drink early and often and that's just to get you to your three martini lunch, and on the other count because you're going to offset it straight away with an ephedrine/cocaine cocktail.
But 12 shots, later going up to 18 and change, in a two hour period - that's not too bad for a young lady who isn't addicted to anything at all!
Zseni wrote:
It's pretty obvious that not only would I make the better president, I would also make the better admin! Chances of becoming either: zip.
You can't even remember stuff that happened yesterday, can you? What am I talking about, you probably can't even remember stuff you posted five minutes ago.
Zseni wrote:
I can hear your finger itching to slam down on the BAN ZSENI button. Give in, SBBDR. Give in to your base cowardice, your petty tyranny. GIVE IN! Free YOUR beknighted site of the curse of Zseni, who dares to...make posts to Caltrops! Let your usually impotent rage be your guide, and turn to the dark side of administration! Alternately you could quit obsessing over whether I'm talking about you or not. You're indirectly giving people exactly the impression you don't want them to have: that there's something important about my opinion. Yes Zseni, responding to you validates you. Just as it did Binro, mm? Additionally, you have to actually make me mad before I could conceivably act out of rage. You just bore me, with the occasional annoyance. BAN ZSENI button: unpressed since '03. Since the time, you know, you spammed caltrops because you're a crumbling wimp who is without question (thanks to helpful evidence) the worst at handling criticism.
Your responses don't validate anything but the level and intensity of your "annoyance": high, and tight. Indirectly you are giving the signal that my criticism is something you take more personally than you take the average poster's, therefore there's something special about either it or me. I'm sorry, dummy, but there is no magic post vortex that sucks up your motivation for responding and replaces it with "totally chill conversation for fun."
I don't think you're bored with me. You're reading most of - if not all - my posts and you respond to some of them at considerable length. You keep bringing up Binro like it's a meaningful comparison, but Binro was and is a genuinely sick individual who had and has a compulsion to post in a place that would punish him for doing so. At the present moment you are much closer to that line than I am: admitting hurt, and "annoyance", and anger, and continuing to return to the source(s) of those negative emotions.
I wanted Caltrops out of SB's hands because he was generally unreliable and prone to misusing his administrative powers. I want Caltrops out of your hands because you can't take it here anymore, and I think it's only a matter of time before you crack and do yourself some permanent damage. You will no doubt respond, either here or to yourself, with a mass of excuses and protestations that you were just trolling or kidding or it's a big joke or I'm pulling some kind of savior act. But I don't mind pushing you over the edge just to watch you fall, for starters, and after that you should consider why you're so immensely defensive. Maybe you don't want to admit that reason to me or to anyone else on here, but if you can't admit it to yourself then you have a serious problem and you need to, at the very least, take a good long break from this site and get your head screwed on straight again.
I don't need to lecture you on obsessive-compulsive behavior, BDR. You know the symptoms and signs, but you might not realize that you're presenting them. You are.
boring |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
I am drunk. by Zseni 08/06/2004, 9:02pm PDT 
Could you blog somewhere else? by Worm 08/06/2004, 9:41pm PDT 
Re: Could you blog somewhere else? by Chairman Mao 08/07/2004, 11:12am PDT 
Re: Could you blog somewhere else? by wherever 08/07/2004, 5:00pm PDT 
All the alcohol is being absorbed by your fat NT by Just an observation 08/06/2004, 10:38pm PDT 
Re: All the alcohol is being absorbed by your fat by Zseni 08/07/2004, 4:56am PDT 
I was drunk last night, too. by I need clarification 08/07/2004, 10:00am PDT 
Welcome to the club! OH WOW ALCOHOL! NT by Tycho 08/07/2004, 3:05pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/07/2004, 3:44pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Zseni 08/07/2004, 5:59pm PDT 
But your I'm drunk post... by Oblong 08/07/2004, 7:03pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by DeadDogBuried 08/07/2004, 7:11pm PDT 
I didn't write that. The drinking, I take it? by Bill Dungsroman 08/07/2004, 7:15pm PDT 
pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by whydirt 08/07/2004, 8:46pm PDT 
Re: pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by Bill Dungsroman 08/07/2004, 10:15pm PDT 
Re: pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by Zseni 08/08/2004, 10:06am PDT 
Re: pre-emptive double-dumbass on BDR by Bill Dungsroman 08/08/2004, 5:34pm PDT 
Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Zseni 08/08/2004, 5:52pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 6:08pm PDT 
Damn you're a cum-dumpster of unoriginality. by Ormus 08/08/2004, 6:43pm PDT 
You used "sko" like you were Zseni. Way to bite her style, Creepo. NT by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 7:05pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Worm 08/08/2004, 6:52pm PDT 
Pretend the missing 's' and the unnecessary space aren't there. Thanks. NT by Worm 08/08/2004, 6:54pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/08/2004, 8:57pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Zseni 08/09/2004, 4:08am PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by wherever 08/09/2004, 1:43pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/09/2004, 11:20pm PDT 
Here I am again! by Fussbett 08/10/2004, 6:36pm PDT 
Re: Here I am again! by Bill Dungsroman 08/10/2004, 10:36pm PDT 
Get the FUCK off me! NT by Fussbett's high horse 08/10/2004, 11:05pm PDT 
Leisuretown was suppose to be my breakout thread by Pieter 08/11/2004, 12:52am PDT 
For the record, I used to share the AIM love with you. by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 2:31am PDT 
INC to BDR: "And I faked all my orgasms, too!" by Bill Dungsroman 08/11/2004, 2:43am PDT 
Re: INC to BDR: "And I faked all my orgasms, too!" by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 2:47am PDT 
People - please, please, we're losing the point here. by Kthor 08/11/2004, 8:04am PDT 
Re: People - please, please, we're losing the point here. by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 12:15pm PDT 
Me :( by curst 08/12/2004, 1:48pm PDT 
Re: Here I am again! by laudablepuss 08/11/2004, 6:02pm PDT 
ON MY OWN! GOiN Down the only road I've ever known! like a drifter I was born t NT by whydirt 08/11/2004, 9:00pm PDT 
This is a very pedantic post. by Fussbett 08/11/2004, 8:52pm PDT 
Thanks for the warning. by Bill Dungsroman 08/12/2004, 10:46am PDT 
Yeah! by Fussbett 08/12/2004, 6:20pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Zseni 08/11/2004, 5:34pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/11/2004, 8:20pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by I need clarification 08/11/2004, 8:39pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/12/2004, 10:43am PDT 
Re: something or other by Hairsplitter 08/10/2004, 12:06am PDT 
BDR's Brawl Hall article ranks highly by Entropy Stew 08/10/2004, 12:14am PDT 
See? by I need clarification 08/10/2004, 12:46am PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by corax 08/09/2004, 6:54pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by Bill Dungsroman 08/09/2004, 7:06pm PDT 
Re: Zseni vs. BDR: feature review by I need clarification 08/09/2004, 7:48pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/08/2004, 12:05am PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Zseni 08/08/2004, 10:09am PDT 
You're really boring. I regret I read any of that. :( NT by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 12:34pm PDT 
Mwaah! NT by Inc's Lips on Zseni's rotund ass 08/08/2004, 12:38pm PDT 
YEAH NO TELLING THE TRUTH ALLOWED NT by CaltropsPostersUniteAgainstZseni 08/08/2004, 2:37pm PDT 
ROFL by Truth Telling? 08/08/2004, 3:40pm PDT 
LOL! ROFLMAO!!! NT by Internet laughing guy 08/08/2004, 6:24pm PDT 
You're right, that was a great post. I hope BILL posts a lot more (for you). :) NT by I need clarification 08/08/2004, 3:35pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Fullofkittens 08/07/2004, 5:28pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Truth Telling? 08/08/2004, 4:10pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 6:01pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 6:07pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 6:10pm PDT 
Re: I am drunk. by Chairman Mao 08/08/2004, 7:13pm PDT 
LOGGINSNOWPLZKTHX. by Chairman Dorkface 08/08/2004, 8:20pm PDT 
Re: LOGGINSNOWPLZKTHX. by Vverner Von Monocle 08/08/2004, 11:06pm PDT 
HeylookanotherTrainwreckZsenithreadhownice by Entropy Stew 08/09/2004, 4:16pm PDT 
SHORT REVIEW: Northern Virginia by Ray of Light 08/09/2004, 8:14pm PDT 
I'm an n-tiered systems protagonist by Entropy Stew 08/09/2004, 8:46pm PDT 
Re: I'm an n-tiered systems protagonist by whydirt 08/09/2004, 9:21pm PDT 
DECLAROBANG NT by Indefenestrable Stew 08/11/2004, 3:14am PDT 
|
|