|
by col.schickn 11/23/2013, 8:38am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mysterio wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
Everquest in the early days had no parametric events, so every time you're in the faggy elf city and there are people riding up the elevator to the treetop forest, the elevator has to retransmit its coordinates with each new world update - prediction was only for players.
It was kind of funny watching the elevator, just by itself, stuttering up and down as each new world-positional coordinate was transmitted. Even funnier was watching it literally HOP several feet each few frames if, say, 30 players got on it at once.
The guys at 989 bragged in interview after interview about how great their netcode was, too - I read with anticipation, and when I saw that behavior I started laughing because I had started reading up on parametric events at age 17.
Take out the word "faggy" and this reads just like TDARCOS. Poor SB.
sb did that shit all the time. He would knowingly chuckle to himself about some code that was making people hundreds of thousands of dollars that had to make a compromise somewhere and then say how dumb the guys were that made it. He had no concept of code actually doing something and its no surprise that Bioshock 3 is one of the worst games ever made with him there. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Carmack's 'rocket' by Senor Barborito 02/05/2003, 5:41am PST 
Re: Carmack's 'rocket' by Mischief Maker 02/05/2003, 11:58am PST 
Sheesh by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 12:01am PST 
Re: Sheesh by Cyrris 02/09/2003, 1:26am PST 
That's telling me by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 2:11am PST 
Well by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:06am PST 
I don't get it! by Fussbett 02/09/2003, 1:11am PST 
He's jealous. Duh. -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/09/2003, 3:22am PST 
I'm not much of a programmer by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 4:58am PST 
You're not much of anything by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 5:32am PST 
Re: You're not much of anything by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 5:47am PST 
Re: You're not much of anything by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:29am PST 
That's better than being unable to read by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 5:49am PST 
Also question for the moron by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 5:56am PST 
Oh, stop with the pretending you know math, already. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:32am PST 
"You can't read." Brilliant. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:28am PST 
Better than anything you've posted to the site, at least by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 12:43pm PST 
Holy crap, it just occurred to me. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 2:31pm PST 
PS: by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 2:49pm PST 
Hahahaha by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 3:18pm PST 
Thank you for proving my point. by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 3:17pm PST 
Tsk tsk, and you were almost making sense up until that point by Entropy Stew 02/09/2003, 4:55pm PST 
You're both right and wrong. by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 5:45pm PST 
Carmack: History's rocketeer or programmer? by Fussbett 02/09/2003, 6:08pm PST 
Presumably by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:18pm PST 
Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 6:16pm PST 
Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 7:10pm PST 
Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 7:13pm PST 
Hell by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 8:51pm PST 
Also by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 8:58pm PST 
Hold up by mark 02/09/2003, 9:19pm PST 
Re: Hell by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 11:48pm PST 
Re: Hell by Senor Barborito 02/10/2003, 12:07am PST 
Re: Hell by Zebco Fuckface 02/11/2003, 7:08am PST 
Lot of network talk over the past few days .. by bastage 02/09/2003, 7:48pm PST 
Re: Lot of network talk over the past few days .. by Lufteufel 02/09/2003, 10:07pm PST 
Quake 1: 250-350ms ping over modem. Those were the days n/t NT by <-Nordic-> 02/11/2003, 9:48pm PST 
Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by mark 02/09/2003, 9:43pm PST 
Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 9:59pm PST 
oops, should have read this first re: carmack [nt] NT by Lufteufel 02/09/2003, 10:08pm PST 
Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by Mysterio 11/23/2013, 6:46am PST 
Re: Also some anecdotal failures on these topics by col.schickn 11/23/2013, 8:38am PST 
This post should be stickied forever by This is what futurists actually bel 08/07/2017, 10:55am PDT 
Long bets, and the futurists that love them NT by Voxels vs V-2s 08/07/2017, 3:00pm PDT 
Rocket, stealing porn goggle tech, Futurism isn't an 'exact' science. NT by The Happiness Engine 08/08/2017, 6:26pm PDT 
Yeah, exactly. by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 8:57pm PST 
A quick literature search by mark 02/09/2003, 1:26pm PST 
Thank you - this was exactly my point by Senor Barborito 02/09/2003, 1:49pm PST 
Re: That's better than being unable to read by Fat Autistic Fuck 06/11/2022, 12:27pm PDT 
Re: I'm not much of a programmer by Zebco Fuckface 02/09/2003, 5:46am PST 
Yeah, me too!! by I need clarification 02/09/2003, 6:19am PST 
Re: I'm not much of a programmer by fanclub 02/10/2003, 4:36pm PST 
You're right by Senor Barborito 02/10/2003, 4:45pm PST 
But I thought you wanted to weed out the imperfect... -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/11/2003, 1:28am PST 
This whole thing. Bump. NT by Mysterio 11/22/2013, 4:57pm PST 
I was going to snicker at the prediction of Doom 3 revolutionizing the industry by Lemoney Snick 11/22/2013, 7:55pm PST 
Look, the technology was ready, but he was afraid he'd open a portal to hell by blackwater 11/22/2013, 10:20pm PST 
|
|