|
by laudablepuss 03/20/2013, 8:33am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mischief Maker wrote:
Because the book was awful. Less about the thrill of running through an out of control island populated by dinosaurs, more about Jeff Goldblum's character giving a moralistic speech about how genetic engineering is bad every other chapter.
Fuck me, I wonder if the reason I stuck with my genetics bachelors, even after I decided 3rd year it wasn't going to be my career, was partially in defiance against that book? Look at this horrible negative site teaching me things about myself!
You're insane. His books aren't usually terrific, but the movie was crap and the book was pretty good. Dinosaur version control was a great concept, and they KILLED THE MATH FAG. Oh, spoiler alert. Were you seriously pissed off that a sci-fi book might have an impossible premise? Jesus. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Can I just say how utterly underwhelmed I was by Watchmen? by Magic Underwear Maker 10/03/2012, 9:19am PDT 
It had too much of the main present day plot by fabio 10/03/2012, 12:23pm PDT
Pretty sure 99% of the world loved the prison scenes by laudablepuss 10/03/2012, 1:53pm PDT
99% of the world today would fall asleep during Citizen Kane or The Conversation by fabio 10/03/2012, 2:16pm PDT
I enjoyed the Rorschach parts but the movie was boring overall (spoilers) by Fullofkittens 10/03/2012, 3:24pm PDT
The therapist was in it; his briefcase spills open at the climax NT by Vested Id 10/03/2012, 5:43pm PDT
I will defend Watchmen by Ice Cream Jonsey 10/03/2012, 5:17pm PDT
Re: I will defend Watchmen by Ice Cream Jonsey 10/03/2012, 5:19pm PDT
Just read the comic by fabio 10/17/2012, 9:24pm PDT
RRAAAARRL is the best action panel in anything, ever NT by Entropy Stew 10/19/2012, 5:32am PDT
Some annotations by Mysterio 10/19/2012, 7:23am PDT
Re: Some annotations by Souffle of Pain 10/19/2012, 12:27pm PDT
Those all read like autistic wikipedia articles by fabio 10/19/2012, 2:17pm PDT
I am just trying to show you why you are objectively wrong. NT by Mysterio 10/19/2012, 3:25pm PDT
Objectivists: NOT autistic by fabio 10/20/2012, 2:41pm PDT
Re: Objectivists: NOT autistic by Charles Beuwulf 03/21/2013, 8:03am PDT
I'm going to assume you're talking about the movie. by Jerry Whorebach 03/20/2013, 3:17am PDT
Yes. I'm going to assume you're talking about Jurassic Park the movie. by Mischief Maker 03/20/2013, 7:06am PDT
Re: Yes. I'm going to assume you're talking about Jurassic Park the movie. by laudablepuss 03/20/2013, 8:33am PDT
Who said anything about improbability? I'm talking preaching. by Mischief Evil Capitalist 03/20/2013, 9:10am PDT
Are we in a world where Jurassic Park is a bad movie now? NT by Hater Earth 03/20/2013, 7:53pm PDT
Re: Are we in a world where Jurassic Park is a bad movie now? by Charles Beuwulf 03/21/2013, 7:59am PDT
Re: Are we in a world where Jurassic Park is a bad movie now? by laudablepuss 03/21/2013, 9:11am PDT
Jurassic Park did not have bad special effects, fuckface. NT by Gutsby 03/21/2013, 9:19am PDT
That shot was not good. by laudablepuss 03/21/2013, 9:42am PDT
Okay, it had a couple of bad special effects shots. You're a fucking wife. NT by Gutsby 03/21/2013, 10:19am PDT
You mean beard? This is Caltrops. NT by laudablepuss 03/21/2013, 12:18pm PDT
Re: Okay, it had a couple of bad special effects shots. You're a fucking wife. by E. L. Koba 03/21/2013, 9:01pm PDT
That iconic intro obviously needed more text NT by Entropy Stew 03/20/2013, 1:49pm PDT
|
|
