 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| "Winning" and "losing" are only really meaningful in the context of multiplayer. by Jerry Whorebach 02/01/2013, 5:47pm PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| Can you "win" Breakout? Can you "lose" it? There are ten times as many possible outcomes to a game of Breakout as there are digits on the score counter. Some of those outcomes are clearly more desirable than others (well, obviously - that's what makes it a game in the first place), but, absent competition, can any of them truly be said to represent a victory or a defeat? I guess what I'm saying is, if you're playing games by yourself, you're already a loser. No amount of CONGRATURATIONS and virtual kisses from virtual princesses are going to change that. | ||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Is FTL good? Will I have fun for two hours? NT by 01/26/2013, 9:50am PST  If you stay away from strategy guides. by 01/26/2013, 10:22am PST Is this the same logic as Dwarf Fortress's bullshit marketing slogan? by 01/26/2013, 12:49pm PST Sometimes all that painful soul crushing defeat makes success much more sweet. by 01/26/2013, 1:55pm PST No one really believes losing is fun. by 01/31/2013, 11:57am PST "Winning" and "losing" are only really meaningful in the context of multiplayer. by 02/01/2013, 5:47pm PST For two hours, yes by 01/29/2013, 1:14pm PST An easy fix for this would be a dedicated hardpoint by 01/30/2013, 5:34pm PST |
