|
by godamit 12/16/2004, 11:00pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Q: ... I've looked at the remarkable Defense Policy Guidance of 1992 --
Wolfowitz: Wait a minute. Did you look at the guidance or did you look at the draft that was leaked before I saw it?
Q: ... Actually all I saw were summaries of it ...
Wolfowitz: ... the way I remember it approximately is as follows. I gave a quite substantial briefing to Secretary Cheney and what was then called I guess the Defense Resources Board on a post-Cold War defense strategy, the essence of which was to shift from a strategy for being prepared to fight a global war, to being focused on two possible regional conflicts. And to downsize the U.S. military by some 40 percent.
...
As I recall, one of the pieces of hysteria was the idea that this is a blueprint for a massive increase in U.S. defense spending, when in fact it was a blueprint for a 40 percent reduction in U.S. defense spending.
...
Pat Buchanan's "Republic Not an Empire" book spends its first chapter attacking the so-called Wolfowitz Memorandum (ed: the defense policy guidance drawn up by Cheney and Wolfowitz in the 1st Bush Sr administration). ... And he laments the fact that these same Democratic senators who were attacking ... the Wolfowitze Memorandum, had climbed on board the whole policy when it became Clinton's policy in the mid 1990s. ... it was the defense policy of the Clinton years, ironically.
Q; In fact John Louis Gaddis said that.
Wolfowize: Who?
Q: John Lous Gaddis has asid that, that if you look at Clinton's policy it actually does come out of the '92 guidance to some extent.
Wolfowitze: Not to some extent. [Clinton's defense policy]'s pretty much [an exact copy of the defense policy guidance cooked up by the two most influential members of this current administration, Dick Cheney and myself, Paul Wolfowitz.]
Q: But you're --
Wolfowitze: --without acknowledement.
BAD CLINTON MAKE MILITARY WEAK! ALL CLINTON FAULT!
NOT LIKE GOOD STRONG BUSH... GOOD HARD STRONG DICK AND SLICK BUSH AND BUDDY WOLFOWITZ.... THEY DIFFERENT. THEY MILITARY PLAN BETTER AND NOT MAKE PUNY SMALL ARMY LIKE CLINTON SMALL ARMY. CUZ THEY LIKE STRONG ARMY. CLEARLY CLINTON DEFENSE POLICY JUST BLEEDING HEART HATE AMERICA HIPPY, NOT LIKE STRONG DICK 'N BUSH WITH STRONG LOVE AMERICA GUNS.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Uparmor by Fussbett 12/08/2004, 5:47pm PST 
AIM LOG by Fussbett 12/08/2004, 5:51pm PST 
Re: AIM LOG by laudablepuss 12/08/2004, 6:06pm PST 
Re: AIM LOG by E. L. Koba 12/11/2004, 1:31am PST 
Re: AIM LOG by Creexul :( 12/11/2004, 1:37am PST 
Re: AIM LOG by Mysterio 12/11/2004, 5:37pm PST 
The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by whydirt 12/08/2004, 6:34pm PST 
I see they're putting the $87 billion to good use. NT by Mischief Maker 12/08/2004, 6:52pm PST 
It's a physics problem, not a money problem. by laudablepuss 12/08/2004, 7:05pm PST 
Armor manufacturer reportedly capable of defying the laws of physics by Rafiki 12/10/2004, 10:38am PST 
Re: The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by The Joosh 12/10/2004, 5:37am PST 
Nice try NT by Mysterio 12/10/2004, 6:28am PST 
You are untrollable, G! NT by Vertical slits, not horizontal 12/10/2004, 11:39am PST 
Re: You are untrollable, G! by Dave Kelly 12/11/2004, 4:16am PST 
:( NT by Fairy in the last panel 12/11/2004, 1:30pm PST 
Is it still "fielding questions" when you don't answer them? NT by Fullofkittens 12/10/2004, 7:23am PST 
Re: The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by Maxime Faget 12/10/2004, 7:25am PST 
everybody shut up and get lots more APCs in there stat NT by Adopt a Bradley 12/10/2004, 7:42am PST 
Re: everybody shut up and get lots more APCs in there stat by E. L. Koba 12/11/2004, 1:28am PST 
Donald Rumsfeld is Mel Gibson, you are all Tina Turner NT by whydirt 12/11/2004, 1:40am PST 
Hey! by The Liberal Media 12/10/2004, 10:23am PST 
Re: The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by whydirt 12/10/2004, 12:23pm PST 
clarfication for those who need it by fellow retarded 12/10/2004, 12:56pm PST 
Re: clarfication for those who need it by Creexul :( 12/10/2004, 3:17pm PST 
Now lets count the number of replies made by uninformed people by The Joosh 12/14/2004, 5:56pm PST 
Cutting off toes before I get drafted. NT by Worm 12/14/2004, 6:06pm PST 
That's because Joosh bathes daily in a pool of absolute truth or something. NT by so he'd know by Worm 12/14/2004, 6:07pm PST 
Just one teensy little question by laudablepuss 12/14/2004, 6:35pm PST 
That's easy by Lizard_King 12/15/2004, 10:35pm PST 
Re: That's easy by Mysterio 12/16/2004, 2:55am PST 
Re: That's easy by Mysterio 12/16/2004, 4:49pm PST 
Re: That's easy by laudablepuss 12/16/2004, 10:33am PST 
"dumbass"? Please, stop twisting the knife. by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 3:50pm PST 
No. NT by laudablepuss 12/16/2004, 3:53pm PST 
Damn you're retarded. by WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU? 12/16/2004, 5:28pm PST 
Hi, I'm laudablepuss. How are you? by laudablepuss 12/16/2004, 6:15pm PST 
Laterz? NT by FAGGORT 12/16/2004, 7:45pm PST 
Re: Hi, I'm laudablepuss. How are you? by Lizard_King 12/17/2004, 5:37am PST 
Uh huh. Sure. NT by laudablepuss 12/17/2004, 3:59pm PST 
Re: Damn you're retarded. by Bill Dungsroman 12/17/2004, 6:10pm PST 
Stop posting about politics. by whydirt 12/14/2004, 6:38pm PST 
Re: Stop posting about politics. by Creexul :( 12/14/2004, 7:12pm PST 
I remember Rafiki's post! by Fussbett 12/14/2004, 10:52pm PST 
Re: I remember Rafiki's post! by Creexul :( 12/15/2004, 12:14am PST 
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? NT by Really? 12/15/2004, 8:08am PST 
Re: What the fuck is that supposed to mean? by Creexul :( 12/15/2004, 5:50pm PST 
People are now rushing in here for this. In a way, it's great. Plus: L_K! NT by I need clarification 12/16/2004, 9:49pm PST 
IT BE KLINTON FAULT by godamit 12/16/2004, 11:00pm PST 
Re: Uparmor by E. L. Koba 12/11/2004, 1:25am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Creexul :( 12/11/2004, 1:41am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Mysterio 12/11/2004, 4:18am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Maxime Faget 12/11/2004, 7:31am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Creexul :( 12/11/2004, 1:33pm PST 
Re: Uparmor by whydirt 12/11/2004, 9:45am PST 
Re: Uparmor by FABIO 12/11/2004, 11:20am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Maxime Faget 12/15/2004, 2:31am PST 
Fuckin' pogue. Why doesn't get off the goddamned wire already? NT by I need clarification 12/11/2004, 2:45pm PST 
You're just jealous because Koba has cool lingo. NT by Bill Dungsroman 12/11/2004, 7:37pm PST 
One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/15/2004, 10:51pm PST 
Spoken like a true, dogma fed and brain-warshed MORINE NT by Zseni-chan 12/16/2004, 10:57am PST 
I would have thought as little of him before the Marines. by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 3:54pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 12:18pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 4:52pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 4:58pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 5:43pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 8:45pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by I need clarification 12/16/2004, 9:52pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by L.A. hipster 12/17/2004, 12:46am PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/17/2004, 7:41am PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Mischief Maker 12/16/2004, 4:06pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 4:53pm PST 
Airplane pilots probably appreciate the deployment of airplane mechanics. NT by conflictNo 12/16/2004, 6:42pm PST 
There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Lizard_King 12/17/2004, 7:45am PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Rafiki 12/17/2004, 9:21am PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Bodybag 12/17/2004, 6:44pm PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by I need clarification 12/17/2004, 9:05pm PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Lizard_King 12/19/2004, 2:10pm PST 
|
|