|
by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 8:45pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Lizard_King wrote:
That is exactly what you said. Stating outright that some artificial sense of camarederie should prevent me from calling a spade a spade.
No, it isn't. Do you know this soldier personally? Chances are you don't; and yet both you and Koba have already decided he is a sub par soldier, a 'pogue', and some kind of 'shitting his pants' pussy. I'm not asking for an overinflated sense of artificial comeradie, I was making a glib statement about your lack of rationality. I was as surprised as anyone that any soldier would have the brass tacks to completely circumvent the chain of command and go right to the Secretary of Defense with a question like that, until I found out why he asked it. He was put up to it by the press. AND before you go off on the horrible Liberal Nazi lie machine:
However, his answer was not inappropriate, and the issue raised by Spc Wilson is not that big a deal from a strategic perspective.
His answer was completely inappropriate. It was first evasive, then facile and condescending. Is that a good leader? Having so little respect for your subourdinates that you can't give them a straight answer? Hardly. Rumsfeld has played that game with everyone since he took office, and the press finally found a way to jump him for the flip daily browbeatings he doled out over the last four years.
"We're working on it" would have been an infinitely better choice than a preposterous cock-and-bull line about violating the laws of physics.
From a tactical perspective, sure, which is why you have a chain of command to raise things with, so that the hard luck answers that must be given from on high are ameliorated by whatever those below can do to compensate.
You won't find me disagreeing with this; while I'm not going to make any comments about, clearly, how much of a giant faggot Spc. Wilson is, I do think it was in poor judgement to frame the question in the first place.
Now go back to (silently) hoping for my demise.
You can bet on it.
Like I said, this is not about Rumsfeld right now, this is about the guy and his question.
No, Its about Rumsfeld, the whole thread is about Rumsfeld. Its about Rumsfeld in the media, and I'm talking about Rumsfeld now. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Uparmor by Fussbett 12/08/2004, 5:47pm PST 
AIM LOG by Fussbett 12/08/2004, 5:51pm PST 
Re: AIM LOG by laudablepuss 12/08/2004, 6:06pm PST 
Re: AIM LOG by E. L. Koba 12/11/2004, 1:31am PST 
Re: AIM LOG by Creexul :( 12/11/2004, 1:37am PST 
Re: AIM LOG by Mysterio 12/11/2004, 5:37pm PST 
The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by whydirt 12/08/2004, 6:34pm PST 
I see they're putting the $87 billion to good use. NT by Mischief Maker 12/08/2004, 6:52pm PST 
It's a physics problem, not a money problem. by laudablepuss 12/08/2004, 7:05pm PST 
Armor manufacturer reportedly capable of defying the laws of physics by Rafiki 12/10/2004, 10:38am PST 
Re: The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by The Joosh 12/10/2004, 5:37am PST 
Nice try NT by Mysterio 12/10/2004, 6:28am PST 
You are untrollable, G! NT by Vertical slits, not horizontal 12/10/2004, 11:39am PST 
Re: You are untrollable, G! by Dave Kelly 12/11/2004, 4:16am PST 
:( NT by Fairy in the last panel 12/11/2004, 1:30pm PST 
Is it still "fielding questions" when you don't answer them? NT by Fullofkittens 12/10/2004, 7:23am PST 
Re: The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by Maxime Faget 12/10/2004, 7:25am PST 
everybody shut up and get lots more APCs in there stat NT by Adopt a Bradley 12/10/2004, 7:42am PST 
Re: everybody shut up and get lots more APCs in there stat by E. L. Koba 12/11/2004, 1:28am PST 
Donald Rumsfeld is Mel Gibson, you are all Tina Turner NT by whydirt 12/11/2004, 1:40am PST 
Hey! by The Liberal Media 12/10/2004, 10:23am PST 
Re: The Army: Be All You Can Be Given the Limited Budget of the Only Superpower by whydirt 12/10/2004, 12:23pm PST 
clarfication for those who need it by fellow retarded 12/10/2004, 12:56pm PST 
Re: clarfication for those who need it by Creexul :( 12/10/2004, 3:17pm PST 
Now lets count the number of replies made by uninformed people by The Joosh 12/14/2004, 5:56pm PST 
Cutting off toes before I get drafted. NT by Worm 12/14/2004, 6:06pm PST 
That's because Joosh bathes daily in a pool of absolute truth or something. NT by so he'd know by Worm 12/14/2004, 6:07pm PST 
Just one teensy little question by laudablepuss 12/14/2004, 6:35pm PST 
That's easy by Lizard_King 12/15/2004, 10:35pm PST 
Re: That's easy by Mysterio 12/16/2004, 2:55am PST 
Re: That's easy by Mysterio 12/16/2004, 4:49pm PST 
Re: That's easy by laudablepuss 12/16/2004, 10:33am PST 
"dumbass"? Please, stop twisting the knife. by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 3:50pm PST 
No. NT by laudablepuss 12/16/2004, 3:53pm PST 
Damn you're retarded. by WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU? 12/16/2004, 5:28pm PST 
Hi, I'm laudablepuss. How are you? by laudablepuss 12/16/2004, 6:15pm PST 
Laterz? NT by FAGGORT 12/16/2004, 7:45pm PST 
Re: Hi, I'm laudablepuss. How are you? by Lizard_King 12/17/2004, 5:37am PST 
Uh huh. Sure. NT by laudablepuss 12/17/2004, 3:59pm PST 
Re: Damn you're retarded. by Bill Dungsroman 12/17/2004, 6:10pm PST 
Stop posting about politics. by whydirt 12/14/2004, 6:38pm PST 
Re: Stop posting about politics. by Creexul :( 12/14/2004, 7:12pm PST 
I remember Rafiki's post! by Fussbett 12/14/2004, 10:52pm PST 
Re: I remember Rafiki's post! by Creexul :( 12/15/2004, 12:14am PST 
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? NT by Really? 12/15/2004, 8:08am PST 
Re: What the fuck is that supposed to mean? by Creexul :( 12/15/2004, 5:50pm PST 
People are now rushing in here for this. In a way, it's great. Plus: L_K! NT by I need clarification 12/16/2004, 9:49pm PST 
IT BE KLINTON FAULT by godamit 12/16/2004, 11:00pm PST 
Re: Uparmor by E. L. Koba 12/11/2004, 1:25am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Creexul :( 12/11/2004, 1:41am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Mysterio 12/11/2004, 4:18am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Maxime Faget 12/11/2004, 7:31am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Creexul :( 12/11/2004, 1:33pm PST 
Re: Uparmor by whydirt 12/11/2004, 9:45am PST 
Re: Uparmor by FABIO 12/11/2004, 11:20am PST 
Re: Uparmor by Maxime Faget 12/15/2004, 2:31am PST 
Fuckin' pogue. Why doesn't get off the goddamned wire already? NT by I need clarification 12/11/2004, 2:45pm PST 
You're just jealous because Koba has cool lingo. NT by Bill Dungsroman 12/11/2004, 7:37pm PST 
One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/15/2004, 10:51pm PST 
Spoken like a true, dogma fed and brain-warshed MORINE NT by Zseni-chan 12/16/2004, 10:57am PST 
I would have thought as little of him before the Marines. by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 3:54pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 12:18pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 4:52pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 4:58pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 5:43pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Gen. Richard S. VanPatton 12/16/2004, 8:45pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by I need clarification 12/16/2004, 9:52pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by L.A. hipster 12/17/2004, 12:46am PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/17/2004, 7:41am PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Mischief Maker 12/16/2004, 4:06pm PST 
Re: One good guess proved right by Lizard_King 12/16/2004, 4:53pm PST 
Airplane pilots probably appreciate the deployment of airplane mechanics. NT by conflictNo 12/16/2004, 6:42pm PST 
There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Lizard_King 12/17/2004, 7:45am PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Rafiki 12/17/2004, 9:21am PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Bodybag 12/17/2004, 6:44pm PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by I need clarification 12/17/2004, 9:05pm PST 
Re: There is nothing wrong with being a pogue. by Lizard_King 12/19/2004, 2:10pm PST 
|
|