|
|
| |
Forum Overview
::
Peter Molyneux's The Movies
|
| |
|
by Jerry Whorebach 03/11/2007, 12:53am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dana Stevens wrote:
Directed by Zack Snyder, whose first feature film was the 2004 makeover of the horror classic Dawn of the Dead, 300 digitally re-creates the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C., where, according to classical history and legend, the Spartan king Leonidas led a force of only 300 men against a Persian enemy numbering in the hundreds of thousands. The comic fanboys who make up 300's primary audience demographic aren't likely to get hung up on the movie's historical content, much less any parallels with present-day politics. But what's maddening about 300 (besides the paralyzing monotony of watching chiseled white guys make shish kebabs from swarthy Persians for 116 indistinguishable minutes) is that no one involved—not Miller, not Snyder, not one of the army of screenwriters, art directors, and tech wizards who mounted this empty, gorgeous spectacle—seems to have noticed that we're in the middle of an actual war. With actual Persians (or at least denizens of that vast swath of land once occupied by the Persian empire).
Zack Snyder forgot his chief responsibility as a filmmaker: convincing people who base their political beliefs on action movies (not comic fanboys, they don't EVEN have political beliefs) that Republicans are wrong with a capital BUSH. Also, does Slate film critic Dana Stevens even realize what's happening in the Amazon rainforest at this very moment? Because it's sure not coming through in her reviews.
Dana Stevens wrote:
In interviews, Snyder insists that he "really just wanted to make a movie that is a ride"—a perfectly fine ambition for any filmmaker, especially one inspired by the comics.
I can just picture little Zack Snyder sitting alone in his bedroom reading the comics while the rest of us are out learning to spot all the various things men do that could be considered homo-erotic. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
300. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/10/2007, 5:32pm PST 
I wonder if God of War 2 pushed its release date back to coincide with this? NT by Mischief Maker 03/10/2007, 5:43pm PST 
GOOD IDEA by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/10/2007, 5:57pm PST 
PS: this should help convince anyone that 300 is great. by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/10/2007, 6:19pm PST 
Re: PS: this should help convince anyone that 300 is great. by Jerry Whorebach 03/11/2007, 12:53am PST 
This sentence might never be topped by Ice Cream Jonsey 03/11/2007, 1:15am PST 
Your post smacks of either disingenuousness or complete obliviou by Ray of Light 03/11/2007, 1:53am PST 
tableaux vivants NT by *corncob pipe* 03/11/2007, 11:59pm PDT 
Re: PS: this should help convince anyone that 300 is great. by Grumah 03/13/2007, 4:31am PDT 
Hard, manly, good warrior, poet-warrior, discerning, loyal and true men are NT by treasure too often buried. 03/13/2007, 5:41am PDT 
Re: GOOD IDEA by Jerry Whorebach 03/11/2007, 12:24am PST 
Re: GOOD IDEA by I need clarification 03/11/2007, 1:52am PST 
Re: GOOD IDEA by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/11/2007, 11:10am PDT 
Re: GOOD IDEA by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/11/2007, 11:09am PDT 
"This! Is! SPAAAARTA!" [Black dude gets kicked down a well.] NT by allhiphop.com 03/12/2007, 11:46am PDT 
That's pretty racist. NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 03/12/2007, 7:58pm PDT 
Ebert finally reviews 300, finds it morally objectionable. by Creexuls, a monster >:3 08/11/2008, 4:27am PDT 
Hahahahahaha by Fussbett 08/11/2008, 11:24am PDT 
Re: Hahahahahaha by Creexuls, a monster >:3 08/11/2008, 11:40am PDT 
House of Games spoiler! Thanks, fat Ebert! NT by I need clarification 08/11/2008, 12:45pm PDT 
Re: Ebert finally reviews 300, finds it morally objectionable. by Sadakichi Hartmann 08/11/2008, 8:32pm PDT 
Pretty much. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 08/12/2008, 6:45am PDT 
I recently read his review of "Titus Andronicus" by Shakespere. by Mischief Maker 08/12/2008, 7:35pm PDT 
Sadly, this is not particular to Ebert. by motherfuckerfoodeater 08/12/2008, 7:53pm PDT 
|
|
| |
|
| |