 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Oink asks the users how they feel about the ratio. by Fussbett 01/03/2007, 4:46pm PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
OiNK (being single sucks geek find me a lady!) (Administrator) at 2006-11-30 18:41:46 (4 weeks ago) - [PM] - [Quote] Oink had a poll about the famous Oink ratio requirements, and the results were as follows: I think they're fair. 66% I think they're too strict. 26% I think they're too lenient. 8% 8% thinks Oink has too many abusers of the benevolent system, and there were forum threads started by people asking the 26% of users to explain themselves. How can they possibly think Oink is too strict?! Then a mod unironically locked the thread because there was ALREADY A THREAD ABOUT THIS TOPIC. But that's for you to read on your own. For now let's see the official feedback thread: Sam2008 (Power User+) at 2006-11-30 18:43:15 (4 weeks ago) - [PM] - [Quote] PersoANALLY. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Oink asks the users how they feel about the ratio. by 01/03/2007, 4:46pm PST  I hit POST too soon! I'll continue later I guess :( NT by 01/03/2007, 4:47pm PST Re: I hit POST too soon! I'll continue later I guess :( by 01/03/2007, 6:16pm PST You've had a month to think this over. Let's continue. by 02/05/2007, 1:51pm PST Re: You've had a month to think this over. Let's continue. by 02/05/2007, 3:02pm PST I will forgive him if this is so, but he should've said "don't care" instead. NT by 02/05/2007, 3:06pm PST This was brilliant, by the way. Thank you, FSBT. NT by 02/19/2007, 3:24pm PST Weighted Downloads! by 02/21/2007, 11:14am PST Re: Weighted Downloads! by 02/21/2007, 3:56pm PST I'm the owner/head stupid NT by 02/21/2007, 4:12pm PST Hacker site points out what went wrong with Demonoid by 08/06/2013, 5:21pm PDT |
