|
by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 3:06am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senor Barborito wrote:
Here.
While this doesn't apply to us specifically (we aren't a commercial service), this is why our hosts have their panties in a bunch. If analrape.com is any kind of commercial service and Alt789 can access their pics (backdoor, etc.), they're liable for $50,000 / 6 months in prison, and possibly a whole lot more. You know how our hosts, for instance, have another restriction I didn't mention like "DON'T EVER USE THE SHELL WE GIVE YOU TO RUN IRC BOTS" because that invariably leads to people using their service for DDoS? Same reason they get fidgety here. As for lawsuit - there's a good chance she could at least get it far enough (anywhere beyond initial hearing) that ES or I would have to pay for a lawyer, at which point this entire site would cease to exist.
I know nothing I say is going to make you believe me - but once again I fucking hate banning people. I do it because unlike Chet ES, V, and I live on a monetary razor's edge so sharp you could split your pubic hairs with it. I can't afford to dick around with lawyers so I have to play preemptive lawyer to the best of my ability. Once my involvement with the site is effectively ended because UNIX knowledge has been supplanted by rather easy-to-use web interfaces for the new admin team (the code is working as of right now barring a few miscellaneous functions), they'll more or less slowly introduce their own rules that fit their budgets and knowledge of the law.
--SB
I WOULD COUNT ALL THE PORN SITES THAT ARE SUED FROM NOT BANNING MINORS BUT THEN I WOULD RUN OUT OF FINGERS AND TOES! |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Pulling a Zseni (only with angst instead of granny porn) by Alternate789 09/03/2003, 4:45pm PDT 
Re: Pulling a Zseni (only with angst instead of granny porn) by laudablepuss 09/03/2003, 4:56pm PDT 
BRAIN MELTING PLAY ON WORDS DEATH IMPENDING DOOOOOOM NT by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 5:14pm PDT 
Yeah, no shit. Holy shit. What the shit? Shut the fuck up, Laudable. NT by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 1:06am PDT 
Fuck. Above retracted due to INC's agreement. NT by Lizard_King 09/04/2003, 12:21pm PDT 
IOU 1 (one) fatal beating NT by Entropy Stew 09/04/2003, 3:54pm PDT 
I AM POPULAR! by laudablepuss 09/04/2003, 4:07pm PDT 
Done. Let me know if you can still post - you're on a dynamic IP by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 9:38pm PDT 
Note - 'some other people' does not equal anyone around here by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 9:39pm PDT 
Re: Note - 'some other people' does not equal anyone around here by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 7:31pm PDT 
Yeah, I can still post by Alternate789 09/08/2003, 7:22pm PDT 
Not anymore you can't. My apologies to any lurkers from 209.210.x.x NT by Senor Barborito 09/08/2003, 9:20pm PDT 
Why can't you just not come here, you miserable faggot? by laudablepuss 09/09/2003, 11:04am PDT 
Re: Why can't you just not come here, you miserable faggot? by bastage 09/09/2003, 1:16pm PDT 
I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 1:24pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by bastage 09/09/2003, 1:49pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by curst 09/09/2003, 7:43pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by bastage 09/09/2003, 9:49pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 10:23pm PDT 
This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 10:53pm PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by bastage 09/09/2003, 11:11pm PDT 
Read by Senor Barborito 09/10/2003, 1:55am PDT 
Re: Read by /16 COPA violation 09/10/2003, 2:44am PDT 
Re: Read by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 3:06am PDT 
DO THE MATH!!!!!! NT by Creexul's aunt 09/10/2003, 4:19am PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by laudablepuss 09/10/2003, 3:20am PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by Master I/O 09/10/2003, 3:39am PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 6:12pm PDT 
Oh, and to your second question - no, it can't be used to DoS by Senor Barborito 09/10/2003, 1:44am PDT 
I'll believe it when I see the body. by My Stereo 09/10/2003, 1:47am PDT 
Another loser bites the dust! by I need clarification 09/10/2003, 3:56am PDT 
I think it was in Queen of The Damned... by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 8:04pm PDT 
You just answered your own question. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 11:07pm PDT 
It's because they can't take RESPONSIBILITY for their ACTIONS by Crazed_Elderly_Vampire_Lizard_King 09/10/2003, 6:03pm PDT 
|
|