|
by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 10:23pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
bastage wrote:
curst wrote:
Oh come on, he likes to ban. Let the poor guy have his fun.
I've noticed, but while I understand that this site does take some actual work isn't this just ultimately more work ..? And for what ..? Wouldn't it just be easier (and more in character) to just tell him to fuck off and ignore the request ..?
I realize SB gets a chubby from the ban, but come on now. Do I get whacked if I ATOR Alternate789 from my range(s) ..? Sounds like a simplistic DoS to me ..
SB spends most of his day writing down our IP addresses in notebooks.
No, really. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Pulling a Zseni (only with angst instead of granny porn) by Alternate789 09/03/2003, 4:45pm PDT 
Re: Pulling a Zseni (only with angst instead of granny porn) by laudablepuss 09/03/2003, 4:56pm PDT 
BRAIN MELTING PLAY ON WORDS DEATH IMPENDING DOOOOOOM NT by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 5:14pm PDT 
Yeah, no shit. Holy shit. What the shit? Shut the fuck up, Laudable. NT by I need clarification 09/04/2003, 1:06am PDT 
Fuck. Above retracted due to INC's agreement. NT by Lizard_King 09/04/2003, 12:21pm PDT 
IOU 1 (one) fatal beating NT by Entropy Stew 09/04/2003, 3:54pm PDT 
I AM POPULAR! by laudablepuss 09/04/2003, 4:07pm PDT 
Done. Let me know if you can still post - you're on a dynamic IP by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 9:38pm PDT 
Note - 'some other people' does not equal anyone around here by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 9:39pm PDT 
Re: Note - 'some other people' does not equal anyone around here by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/04/2003, 7:31pm PDT 
Yeah, I can still post by Alternate789 09/08/2003, 7:22pm PDT 
Not anymore you can't. My apologies to any lurkers from 209.210.x.x NT by Senor Barborito 09/08/2003, 9:20pm PDT 
Why can't you just not come here, you miserable faggot? by laudablepuss 09/09/2003, 11:04am PDT 
Re: Why can't you just not come here, you miserable faggot? by bastage 09/09/2003, 1:16pm PDT 
I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 1:24pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by bastage 09/09/2003, 1:49pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by curst 09/09/2003, 7:43pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by bastage 09/09/2003, 9:49pm PDT 
Re: I'll trim it back over time significantly - I really, really hate /16 bans. by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 10:23pm PDT 
This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 10:53pm PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by bastage 09/09/2003, 11:11pm PDT 
Read by Senor Barborito 09/10/2003, 1:55am PDT 
Re: Read by /16 COPA violation 09/10/2003, 2:44am PDT 
Re: Read by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 3:06am PDT 
DO THE MATH!!!!!! NT by Creexul's aunt 09/10/2003, 4:19am PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by laudablepuss 09/10/2003, 3:20am PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by Master I/O 09/10/2003, 3:39am PDT 
Re: This isn't lawsuit territory. COPA is a serious offense. by [NWS] Flurgendorf J. Creexul 09/10/2003, 6:12pm PDT 
Oh, and to your second question - no, it can't be used to DoS by Senor Barborito 09/10/2003, 1:44am PDT 
I'll believe it when I see the body. by My Stereo 09/10/2003, 1:47am PDT 
Another loser bites the dust! by I need clarification 09/10/2003, 3:56am PDT 
I think it was in Queen of The Damned... by Fullofkittens 09/09/2003, 8:04pm PDT 
You just answered your own question. NT by Senor Barborito 09/09/2003, 11:07pm PDT 
It's because they can't take RESPONSIBILITY for their ACTIONS by Crazed_Elderly_Vampire_Lizard_King 09/10/2003, 6:03pm PDT 
|
|