|
by The Happiness Engine 09/02/2003, 1:01pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senor Barborito wrote:
you know I heard the weirdest idea the other day and still haven't figured out what the hell is wrong with it, like that tricky question on the crossword puzzle. Proposal goes - whatever the current mean income of America (IIRC $25,000), give that to every citizen every year in biweekly installments. Result? Prices double. People who had NOTHING now can afford food, shelter, clothing. People who had an average salary haven't lost or gained anything. People who made a million a year had their incomes halved because now they make $1,025,000 which is equivalent to $512,500 'old' dollars.
I've yet to figure out a major problem with this idea (outside of the moral outrage I'm sure it instills in you) - any reasons as to why this would lead to economic collapse? Zebco, maybe a little help here?
hmm, quick math, using a figure of 210 million people (rounded from the 2000 census of 209,279,149 people over the age of 18 in the US) means you would need $5.25 trillion dollars per year.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Cronkite's reduces the Democratic Party to 10 points. Hopefully. by Senor Barborito 08/31/2003, 4:45am PDT 
Re: Cronkite's reduces the Democratic Party to 10 points. Hopefully. by Lizard_King 08/31/2003, 2:17pm PDT 
Dammit! All those screeching noises make my head hurt! NT by foogla 08/31/2003, 3:34pm PDT 
Re: Cronkite's reduces the Democratic Party to 10 points. Hopefully. by Callow Sniper 09/01/2003, 12:22am PDT 
Goddamnit TS, don't tell me you were McFly! NT by OG Callow Sniper 09/01/2003, 6:49am PDT 
Just to CLARIFY TS is not me. by McFly 09/01/2003, 2:08pm PDT 
Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Senor Barborito 09/02/2003, 7:33am PDT 
Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by The Happiness Engine 09/02/2003, 1:01pm PDT 
Well, $2.625 trillion NT by Senor Barborito 09/02/2003, 2:13pm PDT 
Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Zebco Fuckface 09/03/2003, 12:56pm PDT 
Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Zebco Fuckface 09/03/2003, 12:58pm PDT 
Assuming we attach work requirement, why does this destroy the economy? by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 4:38pm PDT 
Re: Assuming we attach work requirement, why does this destroy the economy? by corax 09/04/2003, 3:30pm PDT 
Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Mysterio 09/03/2003, 4:40pm PDT 
For whatever it's worth, above was me. rental pc :( NT by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 5:45pm PDT 
That's exactly what I did, in fact by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 5:55pm PDT 
Re: That's exactly what I did, in fact by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 6:21pm PDT 
AHA! Thanks, perfect. by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 6:32pm PDT 
Re: AHA! Thanks, perfect. by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 8:00pm PDT 
No, I didn't, but thanks again anyway. NT by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 8:38pm PDT 
What he said, but he's wrong about France and selling equality in the US NT NT by Zebco Fuckface 09/04/2003, 7:06pm PDT 
Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG NT by Lizard_King 09/04/2003, 8:13pm PDT 
Re: Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG by Zebco Fuckface 09/07/2003, 5:21pm PDT 
Re: Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG by Lizard_King 09/07/2003, 6:03pm PDT 
Re: Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG by Zebco Fuckface 09/08/2003, 10:11pm PDT 
The term is Gini coefficient NT by Senor Barborito 09/08/2003, 11:00pm PDT 
huh. by Lizard_King 09/09/2003, 3:17pm PDT 
Re: huh. by Zebco Fuckface 09/09/2003, 5:12pm PDT 
Re: huh. by Lizard_King 09/10/2003, 2:06pm PDT 
Re: huh. by Zebco Fuckface 09/11/2003, 3:38pm PDT 
Re: huh. by Lizard_King 09/11/2003, 3:55pm PDT 
|
|