Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News
 
Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by The Happiness Engine 09/02/2003, 1:01pm PDT
Senor Barborito wrote:

you know I heard the weirdest idea the other day and still haven't figured out what the hell is wrong with it, like that tricky question on the crossword puzzle. Proposal goes - whatever the current mean income of America (IIRC $25,000), give that to every citizen every year in biweekly installments. Result? Prices double. People who had NOTHING now can afford food, shelter, clothing. People who had an average salary haven't lost or gained anything. People who made a million a year had their incomes halved because now they make $1,025,000 which is equivalent to $512,500 'old' dollars.

I've yet to figure out a major problem with this idea (outside of the moral outrage I'm sure it instills in you) - any reasons as to why this would lead to economic collapse? Zebco, maybe a little help here?

hmm, quick math, using a figure of 210 million people (rounded from the 2000 census of 209,279,149 people over the age of 18 in the US) means you would need $5.25 trillion dollars per year.

PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Cronkite's reduces the Democratic Party to 10 points. Hopefully. by Senor Barborito 08/31/2003, 4:45am PDT NEW
    Re: Cronkite's reduces the Democratic Party to 10 points. Hopefully. by Lizard_King 08/31/2003, 2:17pm PDT NEW
        Dammit! All those screeching noises make my head hurt! NT by foogla 08/31/2003, 3:34pm PDT NEW
        Re: Cronkite's reduces the Democratic Party to 10 points. Hopefully. by Callow Sniper 09/01/2003, 12:22am PDT NEW
            Goddamnit TS, don't tell me you were McFly! NT by OG Callow Sniper 09/01/2003, 6:49am PDT NEW
                Just to CLARIFY TS is not me. by McFly 09/01/2003, 2:08pm PDT NEW
        Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Senor Barborito 09/02/2003, 7:33am PDT NEW
            Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by The Happiness Engine 09/02/2003, 1:01pm PDT NEW
                Well, $2.625 trillion NT by Senor Barborito 09/02/2003, 2:13pm PDT NEW
            Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Zebco Fuckface 09/03/2003, 12:56pm PDT NEW
                Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Zebco Fuckface 09/03/2003, 12:58pm PDT NEW
                    Assuming we attach work requirement, why does this destroy the economy? by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 4:38pm PDT NEW
                        Re: Assuming we attach work requirement, why does this destroy the economy? by corax 09/04/2003, 3:30pm PDT NEW
                    Re: Sorry to take so long, spent three days packing all day by Mysterio 09/03/2003, 4:40pm PDT NEW
                        For whatever it's worth, above was me. rental pc :( NT by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 5:45pm PDT NEW
                        That's exactly what I did, in fact by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 5:55pm PDT NEW
                            Re: That's exactly what I did, in fact by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 6:21pm PDT NEW
                                AHA! Thanks, perfect. by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 6:32pm PDT NEW
                                    Re: AHA! Thanks, perfect. by Lizard_King 09/03/2003, 8:00pm PDT NEW
                                        No, I didn't, but thanks again anyway. NT by Senor Barborito 09/03/2003, 8:38pm PDT NEW
                                What he said, but he's wrong about France and selling equality in the US NT NT by Zebco Fuckface 09/04/2003, 7:06pm PDT NEW
                                    Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG NT by Lizard_King 09/04/2003, 8:13pm PDT NEW
                                        Re: Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG by Zebco Fuckface 09/07/2003, 5:21pm PDT NEW
                                            Re: Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG by Lizard_King 09/07/2003, 6:03pm PDT NEW
                                                Re: Really? Care to expand on that? I mean, NO I'M RIGHT FAAAG by Zebco Fuckface 09/08/2003, 10:11pm PDT NEW
                                                    The term is Gini coefficient NT by Senor Barborito 09/08/2003, 11:00pm PDT NEW
                                                    huh. by Lizard_King 09/09/2003, 3:17pm PDT NEW
                                                        Re: huh. by Zebco Fuckface 09/09/2003, 5:12pm PDT NEW
                                                            Re: huh. by Lizard_King 09/10/2003, 2:06pm PDT NEW
                                                                Re: huh. by Zebco Fuckface 09/11/2003, 3:38pm PDT NEW
                                                                    Re: huh. by Lizard_King 09/11/2003, 3:55pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy