|
by I need clarification 07/01/2003, 11:13pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Lizard_King wrote:
Santorum wrote:
That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.
It's NOT man on dog or man on child. He says, explicitly, they are not equivalent. And if you read the rest of the statement it is clear that the reason he sees bans on homosexuality as an important issue is not because he wants to send law abiding homosexuals to jail, it is because he does not see a law premised on morality alone as an inherently ridiculous concept, which is the basis under which the sodomy laws are under attack. A controversial position, to be sure, but not the straw man which fucking idiots like yourself persist in attributing to him, especially given the last several hundred years of American legal precedents.
Read your own quotes prior to melting down again.
Just how far are you willing to bend over (get it?) for this guy? Taking his quote completely out of context to reverse the meaning isn't going to make him a better person, or his argument any stronger.
So, for the extremely slow (you), I'll break it down for you. If I start too go to fast, kill yourself.
Senator Santorum wrote:
Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society.
Precedent and tradition. As it has always been, it should always be. How far do we roll back? Voting rights for women? Slavery? You make the call!
Senator Santorum wrote:
And that's what? Children. Monogamous relationships.
Science! Biology! The only reason for marriage is to have children and perpetuate the society. Low sperm count? No marriage for you.
Senator Santorum wrote:
In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality.
Return to point #1. No one else has ever done it, why should we? Well, except Belgium and Canada. Also, Vermont seems to be leaning that way. So, we must never do it so that it won't ever have been done, thereby establishing and preserving a precedent in one move. Nice! Anyway, we're getting to the really awful part of your post. I'm still trying to decide if you're an idiot, or you've lost and are giving up:
Senator Santorum wrote:
That's not to pick on homosexuality.
Marriage isn't defined just as "not homosexuality..."
Senator Santorum wrote:
It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.
...it's ALSO not defined as bestiality and pedophilia. I know you're big on logic, so I'm sure you can see that homosexuality, bestiality, and pedophilia are all on the same side of the equation - that side being "things that are not marriage."
Senator Santorum wrote:
It is one thing.
"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have strange gods before me." Marriage is what it is. To change it would be to make it something else, and would destroy it. There cannot be creative change, and all change that has happened before has been destructive. Preserving institutions as they exist currently is the only way to perpetuate them.
Your reply above was the most dishonest thing I've ever seen you post. It's almost criminal. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Dan Savage coins new word, is funny. by FoK 06/19/2003, 8:39am PDT 
There seem to be many advantages to having no character worth defending by Lizard_King 06/23/2003, 10:08pm PDT 
On second thought... by Lizard_King 06/27/2003, 12:08pm PDT 
Yeah! Why haven't the dog-fuckers been more vocal about this?! by I need clarification 06/27/2003, 1:54pm PDT 
Re: Yeah! Why haven't the dog-fuckers been more vocal about this?! by laudablepuss 06/27/2003, 2:53pm PDT 
Have you ever comprehended anything, ever? In your entire life? by I need clarification 06/27/2003, 4:35pm PDT 
Re: Have you ever comprehended anything, ever? In your entire life? by laudablepuss 06/27/2003, 5:05pm PDT 
People! Stay focused! by Fullofkittens 06/27/2003, 5:12pm PDT 
It is you that are missing the point. by Lizard_King 06/29/2003, 9:30pm PDT 
Hmm by Senor Barborito 06/30/2003, 3:18am PDT 
Re: Hmm by FoK 06/30/2003, 8:54am PDT 
Re: Hmm by Chairman Mao 06/30/2003, 12:46pm PDT 
Re: Hmm by Chairman Mao 06/30/2003, 12:54pm PDT 
Re: Hmm by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 5:40am PDT 
Re: Hmm by Senor Barborito 07/01/2003, 6:17am PDT 
Re: Hmm by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 9:48pm PDT 
Hmm 2 by Senor Barborito 07/02/2003, 12:28am PDT 
Re: Hmm 2 by I need clarification 07/02/2003, 1:09am PDT 
I'll cherish this moment forever -NT- by Lizard_King 07/02/2003, 11:26pm PDT 
Are you being purposely obtuse, or did you get dumber over the weekend? by I need clarification 07/01/2003, 3:45pm PDT 
Ur the gayest! Surprise! by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 6:42pm PDT 
Ding ding! 500TH use of of the phrase 'straw man'! Your Limbaugh is showing. by I need clarification 07/01/2003, 11:13pm PDT 
As criminal as being gay? ROFLOFLOFL by Lizard_King 07/02/2003, 11:25pm PDT 
I wish your surrenders were as graceful as mine :( NT by I need clarification 07/04/2003, 4:31pm PDT 
You mean the ones where you just suddenly stop posting in a thread? NT by Entropy Stew 07/04/2003, 5:14pm PDT 
Yes. Like that. Do that. Get it? NT by I need clarification 07/04/2003, 10:20pm PDT 
YES. YES I GET IT. OMFG I AM SO POWERFULLY BURNED. NT by Lizard_King 07/06/2003, 9:04pm PDT 
Your best post yet. I'm almost a conservative after reading that. NT by I need clarification 07/07/2003, 4:03am PDT 
You guys should IM each other. NT by foogla 07/07/2003, 6:33am PDT 
We aren't? NT by I need clarification 07/07/2003, 1:36pm PDT 
Thanks for filling in the requisite liberal histrionics. NT by Lizard_King 06/29/2003, 9:31pm PDT 
I barely remember this thread, Groo by I need clarification 06/30/2003, 5:04pm PDT 
That's the most graceful surrender I've seen on your part yet. by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 5:41am PDT 
Almost as good as the Supremes last week OHHHHHHH!! NT by I need clarification 07/01/2003, 2:22pm PDT 
Did you raise the roof while typing that? NT by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 9:49pm PDT 
Three snaps, actually. NT by I need clarification 07/02/2003, 1:22am PDT 
Raise the Roof! Raise it! NT by Principal Scudworth 07/02/2003, 1:38pm PDT 
Would you rather fuck a cow or fuck a chicken? NT by whydirt, caltrops braintrust 06/27/2003, 2:51pm PDT 
Wasn't there a shitty cartoon about that? NT by Damocles 06/30/2003, 2:41am PDT 
Mr. Magoo? -nt- by Entropy Stew 06/30/2003, 6:32am PDT 
|
|