 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Prove it; you're not giving me anything at all by Commander Tansin A. Darcos 07/03/2014, 6:03am PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
Eurotrash wrote:That's right, accuse the witch, then her claims that you have no proof are evidence of her connection to Satan. This sort of "blame the victim mode" has a long history going back to the Salem Witch Trials, if not earlier. You also prove you did not read what I said. I did not ask for legal-class proof - you just assumed it, using nothing but your own misunderstanding - I simply asked for evidence or proof to show what is being claimed. By "proof" I mean evidence other than subjective opinions. And every time I ask for evidence, I get... silence. Eurotrash wrote:Again, I did not ask for legal proof, I asked for evidence. Something other than pure opinion. And what is the evidence? What evidence has been presented to prove the claims made? I know what insane is, and I don't fall anywhere in that range. I've seen people who are batshit insane; in person, and on-line. One in particular is Ray Gordon who infests the Usenet News Group alt.seduction.fast, and I could point out from his own comments how his statements do not match reality. Like one in which he said the police officers and firefighters who died in the World Trade Center airplanes attack deserved what happened to them. Now, yes, he has the right to free speech, but he made the comments on September 11, 2001, while these people were being crushed and burned to death. This is the sort of thing that shows someone who is completely out of touch with the human condition and has no empathy whatsoever, a pure sociopath. When I have repeatedly asked the Cretinous ReprobatesTM here for evidence for their claims - not a legal level of proof, just something other than creamy bullshit opinions they want to shove down people's throats - I get no response at all, proving, because they have no response, that they have no evidence. Eurotrash wrote:That's as good an explanation as any, I guess. They spew shit and their opinions stink. Eurotrash wrote:I didn't ask that question. You did. Now you answer it. I will note that in many cases, when I mention something about myself, people will use it against me. They seem to have a lot of fun bashing people because of their disabilities. Eurotrash wrote: You're not giving me anything at all to work with. You, or other nutcases here, are claiming I'm suffering from mental diseases. But you provide zero evidence to support your claims. It seems like they're deflecting; they don't want to admit their own mental illnesses, so they assign them to me so they can make themselves feel better by assuming they're superior to me. So, if there is evidence, show it to me. Show me the reasons you believe these things. You must be able to articulate why you believe what you believe. Further, if I do have the problems you claim I do, I'm not going to be able to see them. So point out, so that I may understand, exactly what you or other people are claiming. And sometimes I think the suspicions of deflection on my part by others is not that far off. Many times i have found people disagreeing with what I say in which they quote me, then, with my own words quoted in their comments, presume to claim I said the exact opposite of what I said then disagree with it! Or, as I have noted, they don't even read what I say before disagreeing with it. I once wrote one item in which I said "it was unfortunate homosexuals have to be abnormal and perhaps with treatment they will become able to be bisexual, like normal people." Anyone with 1/2 a brain should have realized I was either trolling or clearly wasn't serious, but they never bothered to read to the end of the sentence I wrote. Back on alt.seduction.fast, Ray Gordon was threatening to sue people who disagreed with his opinions, which on occasions, he does. And other people more-or-less replied about the threats of legal action. So I posted a message announcing that all claims of lawsuits will stop immediately, or I was going to sue everyone who claimed they were going to sue or respond to an action, no exceptions. Out of perhaps a hundred or more people who routinely respond or post messages on that group, most were complaints, and exactly one person got it, when they said, "Uh, Paul, that would mean you'd have to sue yourself." I remember when I was posting comments of a clearly Libertarian viewpoint in which I argued for the maximum liberty for individuals. Someone called me a "fascist," and I had to look up the word because I wasn't sure, and discovered I was right: it means the exact opposite of what I was saying, someone who wants more government and more controls on individuals. So I have seen many cases where people have read what I said and completely misunderstood what I said, usually because they presumed what they wanted to presume rather than actually reading what I said. ----- "Still the man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." - Paul Simon, The Boxer |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
