 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| If such bullshit ends up discussed here then they won't be getting income, yes. by Worm 05/25/2013, 6:17am PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| It lets people discuss or show one another linkbait trash articles without giving them money. If there was an ironclad way to be able to discuss this phenomenon without falling bait to it, it would be nice. People already use image hosting websites for the same purpose, the only difference here is to streamline it into something easier than print screen. If some trick or service were established for this it'd be neat if it caught on at other websites then it would be up to the individual users or owners of those sites to decide if they want certain sites to income by linkbaiting.
Since I think there is a valid question of if accidentally writing that X-box live costs 60 bucks a month is honest idiocy or a cleverly laid trap by a greasy writer to wring a few more bucks out of his garbage, there should probably a safe way to jeer at that person. Some sort of search engine snapshot seems like the best method. I'm baffled you're pretending to be dumb enough to not understand my original point. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Let's filter all rps/kotaku/linkbait links to take google's cached versio by 05/24/2013, 8:28pm PDT  Are you on some kind of rejectionism kick? Don't support the MAN, man. by 05/25/2013, 12:48am PDT If such bullshit ends up discussed here then they won't be getting income, yes. by 05/25/2013, 6:17am PDT I'm asking why your original point has any worth. by 05/25/2013, 6:43am PDT Think of it as a second measure or something. by 05/25/2013, 2:50pm PDT How about the third option? by 05/25/2013, 3:47pm PDT I guess, but a system that defeated link baiting would be great! NT by 05/25/2013, 5:54pm PDT it's just me probably by 05/26/2013, 12:29am PDT Re: it's just me probably by 05/26/2013, 11:02am PDT |
