Forum Overview :: ELECTION WATCH 2008
 
Re: Ebert is doing his part, are YOU? by Ice Cream Jonsey 10/06/2008, 11:14am PDT
Creexuls, a monster >:3 wrote:

Obviously, buhs does not deserve to win the 2008 election.


You... you think this is a joke?? What the fuck is wrong with you? How can you laugh while the country burns, Cable??

Haha, no, I'm just fucking around, fuck eBert. A guy making one kind of voting machine said he'd do anything to elect Bush, which is fine and well - if I were a ref in the Big East, Syracuse football would be undefeated right now. But clearly there is an opportunity for the goddamn liberals to make their own voting machine. I don't want to say that I was influenced by BioShock to where it now taints all my posts like ... well, not actual taint as we know it, BUT: the free market should be able to handle voter fraud. If the dems aren't making their own machines, and I don't think they are, then maybe they are really as lazy as everyone claims. A MAME machine is more complicated than a voting box - Kerry lost because he couldn't inspire people more than the motivation of being able to play Chelnov: Atomic Runner for free.


the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Ebert is doing his part, are YOU? by Creexuls, a monster >:3 10/06/2008, 7:08am PDT NEW
    Re: Ebert is doing his part, are YOU? by Ice Cream Jonsey 10/06/2008, 11:14am PDT NEW
        Hypothetical free market is hypothetical. NT by newfag 10/06/2008, 11:36am PDT NEW
            I was gonna say that, yeah by Ice Cream Jonsey 10/12/2008, 4:34pm PDT NEW
        There are open source secure voting systems out the ass by Entropy Stew 10/12/2008, 7:13pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy