|
by Creexuls, a monster >:3 10/06/2008, 7:08am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Let's watch Ebert's slow descent into Dana Stevens. Every single recent review of his is really about buhs. EVEN MOVIES THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM IF YOU CAN BELIEVE IT (CAN YOU?)
A movie about a guy who invented a new windshield wiper setting.
I know that I sound just like a liberal, but at this point in history I am sick and tired of giant corporations running roughshod over decent people -- cutting their wages, polluting their work environment, denying them health care, forcing them to work unpaid overtime, busting their unions and other crimes we have never heard George Bush denouncing while he was cutting corporate taxes. I am sure lower taxes help corporations to function more profitably. Why is that considered progress, when many workers live in borderline poverty and executives have pissing contests over who has the biggest stock options?
But enough. I have "Flash of Genius" to review. Yes, I am agitated. I am writing during days of economic meltdown, after Wall Street raped Main Street while the Bush ideology held it down.
A movie by someone who thinks eating meat causes global warming.
Or maybe "talks with" is not quite the right phrase. It's more that he lines them up and shoots them down. He interrupts, talks over, slaps on subtitles, edits in movie and TV clips, and doesn't play fair. Reader, I took a guilty pleasure in his misbehavior, but only if it's from a liberal.
A movie about how an unstable political party (in other words, a political party) self destructed (that is to say operated normally) because apparently one state was stolen and it won them the entire election (good job ^_^b).
I'm getting tired of being angry about the 2004 Presidential election. It is now clear enough that it may have been stolen. The vote totals in Ohio are particularly suspect. Florida in 2000 you know all about. But did you ever seriously focus on Ohio 2004?
Obviously, buhs does not deserve to win the 2008 election. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|