|
by Bill Dungsroman 07/26/2004, 10:47am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I need clarification wrote:
I didn't see anyone posting "LOL" after any of Ray's droning posts.
I guess my memory is fuzzy after the recent purging. Did we use to do that?
I need clarification wrote:
In fact, I think the general reaction was more along the lines of, "Well, it looks like Ray is hanging in there, for some reason."
You "think?" It's always refreshing to see you, on the heels of yet another barrage of dumb jokes leveled at lp and whydirt, toss out something as janitor-esque as this. But not really, because it's just another one of your LOOK AT ME trolls. Fine, we're looking. Wow, same boring display.
I need clarification wrote:
There was never any real upside in it for him.
Me, I'm always waiting for lines like these. Gosh INC, why would Ray! ever bother to argue with someone on a message board over something pointless with little to gain? Why don't you tell us?
I need clarification wrote:
I'm baffled why he chose to take Zseni's bait at all, and that it only took a couple of posts for him to go to fat jokes (I guess?)
Oh, there's no need to put that in parenthesis. You're dumb and clueless, there's no need to hide it anymore. And what's this? Admonishing Ray!, who is LOLZER far more an interesting read than you'll ever be, for falling back on old digs? This, from the fucking Rip Taylor of caltrops?
I need clarification wrote:
instead of the mythical "Ray! of light"-style prose that may not have ever existed, but certainly was hinted at enough for an aura of greatness to grow around him.
That aura is gone for good, now, btw. :(
And tomorrow you'll turn into a pelican and migrate to the Galapagos Islands. Whoever posts will just be someone who has fortuitously assumed your nick, with you no longer here to reclaim it. Wow, it's true because I just said it! Oops, forgot this, the INC Seal of Fact :(
I need clarification wrote:
Probably for the better, considering how sad your post above is. Now you can just read his shit like everyone else's. You won't have as much riding on it, because if it sucks (and it MIGHT), it won't cause your world to implode. Or your impervious powers of denial to be taxed.
Congratulations! You get to be wrong like Zseni, and as usual, it only took one of your fetid offerings to plunk yourself firmly in the L column. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Machismo revisted. by Zseni 07/25/2004, 2:54am PDT 
Re: Machismo revisted. by E. L. Koba 07/25/2004, 4:39am PDT
Re: Machismo revisted. by Zseni 07/25/2004, 7:37am PDT
I've demanded nothing of you but your best by Ray of Light 07/25/2004, 11:14pm PDT
You're clearly wasting your time. by Zseni 07/26/2004, 4:32am PDT
You're a dumbhead because I say it is so! NT by *STAMPS FOOT* 07/26/2004, 9:24am PDT
Did you know there were ELEVEN battles of the Isonzo? by laudablepuss 07/27/2004, 3:34am PDT
Ray could make the Holocaust funny, and I might be behind it. Make this funnier. NT by Worm 07/25/2004, 5:53am PDT
By calling Hitler short or something? NT by I need clarification 07/25/2004, 10:13am PDT
If Ray said Hitler was short Zseni would mention Napoleon. NT by Worm 07/25/2004, 11:21am PDT
I guess that makes you right about Ray being hilarious, after all. :( NT by I need clarification 07/25/2004, 11:40am PDT
Me (talking to Spanish-born Taipei-based sword collector and Aikido expert by who has worked in a number of 07/25/2004, 11:49am PDT
May is skinny and bookish. Eyelass frames extremely delicate. Low tolerance for by mess of any kind. Her bedroom 07/25/2004, 12:11pm PDT
That was well written, missed it. Maybe I'll try to read that shitty Zseni NT by post again. 07/25/2004, 12:50pm PDT
Are you funny? NT by Ever? 07/25/2004, 8:53pm PDT
We know for certain that you in particular are never funny. NT by Edward Gibbons 07/25/2004, 8:55pm PDT
Ad Hominem NT by Zseni 07/25/2004, 9:21pm PDT
Yes, hadn't you noticed? NT by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 1:00am PDT
No, you aren't. NT by I don't need clarification 07/26/2004, 2:04pm PDT
Yeah! BDR's roomate tried to suck him awf! Har! NT by LOL 07/25/2004, 1:18pm PDT
Whoever's got gas, it's killing me!! NT by here all week 07/25/2004, 4:03pm PDT
Just so you (and your BIG HUNK OF MACHO MAN) know by whydirt 07/25/2004, 7:06am PDT
Re: Just so you (and your BIG HUNK OF MACHO MAN) know by Zseni 07/25/2004, 7:44am PDT
Re: Just so you (and your BIG HUNK OF MACHO MAN) know by whydirt 07/27/2004, 6:14pm PDT
WE DON'T ACCEPT RAGING BULLDYKES by LAW SCHOOL EVERYWHERE 07/27/2004, 6:18pm PDT
Not funny by You lose 07/25/2004, 7:37am PDT
Re: Not funny by Zseni 07/25/2004, 7:45am PDT
That would have been a good post only if everything you said wasn't wrong. :( NT by I need clarification 07/25/2004, 10:14am PDT
Jesus cracker christ, let it go. You already lost (badly) NT by You've lost this war, go home 07/25/2004, 11:59am PDT
Crackers!!! Delicious! NT by Manly Men Dining On The Cheap 07/25/2004, 12:08pm PDT
Perfect! All that it's missing is a character named Grover. NT by mrs. johnson 07/25/2004, 1:16pm PDT
Stop acting so catty. by Rex Reed 07/25/2004, 1:17pm PDT
You just figured out why it's so great, anonyfruit. NT by mrs. johnson 07/26/2004, 12:59am PDT
Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by conflictNo 07/25/2004, 2:29pm PDT
Yeah, Ray lost when he engaged the argument. Romero weighs in, too. by I need clarification 07/25/2004, 3:56pm PDT
wow by FABIO 07/25/2004, 8:07pm PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Zseni 07/25/2004, 3:59pm PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Entropy Stew 07/25/2004, 10:12pm PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Zseni 07/25/2004, 11:06pm PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Entropy Stew 07/26/2004, 2:15am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Zseni 07/26/2004, 10:54am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by wherever 07/26/2004, 1:32pm PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 4:44pm PDT
You're ten times the man that is really a woman who likes jerky by Zseni-lover 07/26/2004, 2:17pm PDT
This seems to be the standard answer to anyone who says Ray! isn't super-funny. by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 4:45pm PDT
I did not have sexual relations with Zseni's fat ass. NT by Clinton 07/26/2004, 6:02pm PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Pieter 07/27/2004, 12:26am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Entropy Stew 07/27/2004, 3:33am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Zseni 07/27/2004, 4:17am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by Entropy Stew 07/27/2004, 11:24am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 1:05am PDT
Re: Being macho means not having to explain yourself. by pieter 07/26/2004, 4:33am PDT
Who the fuck are you, again? NT by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 8:07am PDT
He's "pieter." Can't you read (his awesome sig)? NT by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 4:46pm PDT
You're boring, shut up. NT by Arbiter of Comedy 07/26/2004, 7:52am PDT
As surmised, INC sucks in blue, too. by Bill Dungsroman 07/26/2004, 10:47am PDT
Why don't you just write "neener neener neener!" by Edward Gibbons 07/26/2004, 11:19am PDT
Wow, that was lazy even for Gibbons NT by FABIO 07/26/2004, 1:45pm PDT
Didn't your male roommate suck your dick? by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 4:42pm PDT
You're fat by pieter 07/26/2004, 5:29pm PDT
INC: easier than v. by Bill Dungsroman 07/26/2004, 6:23pm PDT
Hey, I remember you - didn't you drop out of medical school or something? NT by I need clarification 07/26/2004, 7:40pm PDT
SO FUNNY NT by Pack of retards 07/26/2004, 8:20pm PDT
Donkeys are dumb :(. by Zseni's Ass 07/26/2004, 3:29pm PDT
What the fuck even IS all this? by K. Thor Jensen 07/26/2004, 4:29pm PDT
Re: What the fuck even IS all this? by Creexul :( 07/26/2004, 5:05pm PDT
vpocalypse is to Zseni-hating what 9/11 was to flag-buying NT by Ray of Light 07/26/2004, 7:59pm PDT
|
|
