|
by Fussbett 10/14/2006, 1:04pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
stepdown wrote:
Yeah, public trackers are brilliant for leeching.
It's a living nightmare! Downloading things and not worrying about giving back. WHO WANTS THAT?!?!
stepdown wrote:
You can grab like 15GB and seed 0GB, it's like a free-leech period that never ends! :D
This guy really understands how BitTorrent works. He knows it better than Bram, in fact!
stepdown wrote:
I bet Ben got banned from places like this and is sore. All the comments I've seen from him are dumb though, like he's upset that people are using his idea but not in the way he wanted them to. It's only because his way is outdated and a bit dumb now.
Or Ben, whatever.
halo wrote:
Not at all, I find that if you're patient you can get to over 1.0 on most torrents, even on for example an episode of Lost - this typically downloads (for me) in around 20 mins (because I cap my d/l speed)
This person is limiting their download speed in order to share correctly. And loving it! It's not crazy at all because (s)he is helping the community. Because data is a non-renewable resource now, apparently.
OiNK wrote:
gkenobi wrote:
digg sucks.
I'd add to that:
Bram Sucks
I bet he was banned somewhere and now he's all mad.
This part is awesome. Oink getting mad at the inventor of the Oink engine for not bending to the new crazy system. I hope Oink starts to get all Netscape on his Microsoft ass. New Oink brand private-friendly BT rival coming soon?
mikesown wrote:
Agreed. No one sacrifices their share ratios or looses any credits unless they download something. Having torrents up which no one downloads is not a bad thing as long as the titles, artists, and bitrates are accurate.
OCD IN FULL EFFECT. Yeah people, your ratio is going to be fine as long as you don't download anything. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|