Forum Overview :: Operation: Hammer Time
 
The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Chemdem 04/10/2003, 2:19pm PDT
Jr.Walker wrote:


Re: Darwin/Anti-Darwin

Help me out with this one. I once read an article on how viciously the scientific community will rip your name and work if you so much as criticize the established Darwin/Evolution timeline.

Fuck creationism, not about that (haha) debate. This is about how when Darwin fails you are not allowed to discuss it. Carbon dating data has been tossed or disregarded when it conflicts with prevailing thought and heads of universities and even editors of scientific journals have lost jobs claiming that there are huge holes of logic in Darwinism.

Google keeps pointing me at MOTHERFUCKING STEALTH CHRISTIANS BLAH BLAH SEVEN FUCKING DAYS (which makes sense only in as much as it is scientific/academic suicide to publish ?stick it up your ass my colleagues,? papers unless you have jesus and his bank on your side).

Shit, anyone have better resources then this?

Evolution has nothing to do with the scientific community at large being a pack of wolves. They may be polite to your face in person, but if they think that they have found a hole in your pet theory you can bet they will rip you a new one when you present it to the community at large. That is the nature of the beast. University heads and journal editors have no business rhetorically damning a theory unless they have valid research to back up their claim and present it to the community just like everyone else. Using their position to rail against some perceived wrong is a political not scientific tool, and their termination/humiliation is paramount.

The Creationism/Intelligent Design vs Evolution debate is largely political, which is why you will see more science writers than scientist engaging in the "debate". Scientists have better things to do, like actual science.


PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Terror no more? by Mr Smoke 04/09/2003, 5:08pm PDT NEW
    Fear not by Ray, of Light 04/10/2003, 1:14am PDT NEW
        Re: Fear not by Jr.Walker 04/10/2003, 9:46am PDT NEW
            Huh? by Beast-God 04/10/2003, 12:39pm PDT NEW
            Re: Fear not by Link Lord 04/10/2003, 1:17pm PDT NEW
            The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Chemdem 04/10/2003, 2:19pm PDT NEW
                Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by t0ny 04/10/2003, 2:50pm PDT NEW
                    Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Jr.Walker 04/11/2003, 2:51am PDT NEW
                        Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by foogla 04/11/2003, 5:15am PDT NEW
                            Re: The pro/con evolution debate is a argument against rhetorical evolution by Jr.Walker 04/11/2003, 9:50am PDT NEW
                                Terry Pratchett - Strata (that was 20 years ago, might be called something else) NT by foogla 04/11/2003, 10:43am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy