Caltrops - Operation: Hammer Time





	[quote name="Chemdem"][quote name="Jr.Walker"] Re: Darwin/Anti-Darwin Help me out with this one. I once read an article on how viciously the scientific community will rip your name and work if you so much as criticize the established Darwin/Evolution timeline. Fuck creationism, not about that (haha) debate. This is about how when Darwin fails you are not allowed to discuss it. Carbon dating data has been tossed or disregarded when it conflicts with prevailing thought and heads of universities and even editors of scientific journals have lost jobs claiming that there are huge holes of logic in Darwinism. Google keeps pointing me at MOTHERFUCKING STEALTH CHRISTIANS BLAH BLAH SEVEN FUCKING DAYS (which makes sense only in as much as it is scientific/academic suicide to publish ?stick it up your ass my colleagues,? papers unless you have jesus and his bank on your side). Shit, anyone have better resources then <a href="http://www.searchalot.com/Top/Science/AnomaliesandAlternativeScience/CriticismofDarwinism/">this</a>? [/quote] Evolution has nothing to do with the scientific community at large being a pack of wolves. They may be polite to your face in person, but if they think that they have found a hole in your pet theory you can bet they will rip you a new one when you present it to the community at large. That is the nature of the beast. University heads and journal editors have no business rhetorically damning a theory unless they have valid research to back up their claim and present it to the community just like everyone else. Using their position to rail against some perceived wrong is a political not scientific tool, and their termination/humiliation is paramount. The Creationism/Intelligent Design vs Evolution debate is largely political, which is why you will see more science writers than scientist engaging in the "debate". Scientists have better things to do, like actual science. [/quote]