|
by Entropy Stew 04/07/2003, 7:36pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Ray, of Light wrote:
Jack Dandy wrote:
Senor Barborito wrote:
Been talking to a friend in the Planetside beta (the MMOFPS for those of you who are forgetful), and what I'm hearing is quite promising - he's an old, old Tribes addict (and MMO addict) and tends to take the game quite seriously. So it was with some surprise that I heard him tell me today that Planetside is much like Tribes writ very, very large. The game is apparently divided up into several continents which contain bases each side fights over.
He's one of the most jaded people I know (think jeep, here) but described being extremely impressed watching roughly 64 players take off in 8 or so assault carriers simultaneously in a massive frontal wave - that's both sides of a large Tribes server all at once for one assault on a base.
It's a fine technical feat, and handily solves the "lopsided teams" problem, but if I wanted to be part of a large, uncoordinated effort whose outcome is unaffected by my great talents, then I'd just have sex.
Maybe that's a complaint about MM-anything more than this game, but I'd love to see MM-FPS done as a loose collection of Quake-3-sized servers, with isolated battles, that have some kind of impact on a large, shared world.
Ray!
Have you ever played an MMOanything? The "uber" clan that is most effective at commanding large numbers of troops will be the winner, just like in MMOeverything else. I'm visualizing sko Ender's Game type flexible hierarchy of smaller semi-independant task forces.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Hmm by Senor Barborito 04/07/2003, 7:41am PDT 
Re: Hmm by Jack Dandy 04/07/2003, 12:37pm PDT 
I don't get it by Ray, of Light 04/07/2003, 6:00pm PDT 
*shrug* by Senor Barborito 04/07/2003, 6:10pm PDT 
Re: I don't get it by Mischief Maker 04/07/2003, 6:17pm PDT 
Re: I don't get it by Entropy Stew 04/07/2003, 7:36pm PDT 
|
|