Forum Overview :: Article Discussions
 
Text is fine, pictures are not *for now* by Senor Barborito 02/21/2003, 8:51pm PST
Zseni wrote:

Bill Dungsroman wrote:

Senor Barborito wrote:

The problem here is that we have no system whereby Johnny 12-year-old has to click 'I am 18 or older' to continue onto the site. As long as we don't have that, distraught soccer mommy can sue the living fuck out of us and easily get the ISP to shut us down.

We have to obey the letter of the US law here, and make a reasonable effort to dodge lawsuits.

US law says we can host porn, and provided we do the above my ISP does not care - they're old-timer UNIX admins who basically see themselves as bandwidth resellers on a personal scale. Their principle, if any, is 'don't make us work.'

--SB


Are we ever going to have something like that? I mean, aren't articles "objectionable" enough as it is? Is it all about pictuces - text is not a factor?



Yeah! Am I or am I not allowed to sex scenes? Stuff stopping juuuust short of penetration, or do I get to include the penetration parts too? Orgasms - are they allowed? How about the parts where I lick the cum off her character's belly? Do I get to include the bondage scenes? There's not a lot of degrading. What about the threesomes, fourgies, and group sex? Sally's Cye dabbles in hard BDSM - spanking scenes are in or out? Flagellation? Masturbation? The borderline pedo stuff? (I.e. two-on-undead-sixteen-year-old, that sort of thing.) The voyeurism/exhibitionist bits? All the scenes that start out with "*smack* suck my cock bitch" followed by cocks getting sucked? Coerced sex? Bad sex? It never even occured to me to ask about all that stuff when I was planning out this project.


You can say whatever you want, Zseni. BDR: yes we are hoping to add a system like that in the near future - hopefully as part of our Mac Hall reinforcements. Essentially a rules interstitial with your typical porn site 'I AM 18 OR OLDER' click-through included as well.

--SB
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
I want to put porn in an upcoming article by Bill Dungsroman 02/20/2003, 6:03pm PST NEW
    Re: I want to put porn in an upcoming article by Jhoh Creexul 02/20/2003, 6:10pm PST NEW
        Creaks' repulsion seconded -nt- by Entropy Stew 02/20/2003, 6:33pm PST NEW
            PUSSIES -nt- NT by Bill Dungsroman 02/21/2003, 11:27am PST NEW
                "Hey, check out my site! It's got diseased cock!!" -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/21/2003, 3:51pm PST NEW
                    let me add my vote of no diseased genitalia -nt- NT by FABIO 02/25/2003, 12:09pm PST NEW
                        Clarification by Bill Dungsroman 02/25/2003, 2:12pm PST NEW
                             "Hey, check out my site! It's got diseased cock!!" -nt- NT by Entropy Stew 02/26/2003, 4:02pm PST NEW
                                Re: "Hey, check out my site! It's got diseased cock!!" -nt- by Bill Dungsroman 02/26/2003, 5:15pm PST NEW
    The problem by Senor Barborito 02/20/2003, 6:24pm PST NEW
        How about a simple disclaimer? Like every other website for a mature audience. by Fussbett 02/20/2003, 7:24pm PST NEW
        Re: The problem by Bill Dungsroman 02/21/2003, 11:29am PST NEW
            Re: The problem by Zseni 02/21/2003, 3:23pm PST NEW
                Text is fine, pictures are not *for now* by Senor Barborito 02/21/2003, 8:51pm PST NEW
                    Don't forget those of us who post from work by MM 02/26/2003, 11:24am PST NEW
                        That too -NT- by Senor Barborito 02/26/2003, 9:55pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy