pinback wrote:

It runs like a ??????? dog for me. And while I don't have the highest-end rig of all time, no other recent games run like a ??????? dog.

So is it running like a ??????? dog for everyone, or is it just not playing nicely with my system for some reason?

Jamtastic Apr 1 @ 12:18pm
You might want to look at the minimum and recommended specs before buying :)

shatteredfriend7 wrote:


ya man hate to break it to ya but your computer gaming now, you need to start learning min/ req specs and how they stack up to your machine. And no other recent games are trying to get the scope that this game has/ can offer. so maybe just focus on 1v1 for now and then once you actually buy/build a decent rig (doesnt have to be high end, like im still running my 960 2gig with an i7 6700k).

TLDR You need to start learning about computers and figure this stuff out before you buy, and save up some money to build a desktop, a fx 4130 and a 660/960 is a good start.

Ojisan Kukk? wrote:

Thank you sir, I haven't laughed that hard all week.
Now stop doing whatever you're doing to that dog.

pinback wrote:

So, you're saying an RTS should run worse than pretty much every other current-generation game. Cool. I mean, I run SC2, Paragon, whatever the hell on Ultra, and in this there's even a half-second delay before I can start drawing a box around units. On "low".

So, laugh if you must, but there's something else going on here.

Ojisan Kukk? wrote:

Sir IRT your laptop, I believe you purchased a very pretty piece of ????. The game obviously does have some problems as mentioned in other threads and reviews, but from the outside looking in, it looks like you are blaming the game for something your machine is just incapable of doing.

That's what I thought was so funny.

pinback wrote:

Listen, putz -- may I call you putz? My point is, I can run every other game I have, smooth as glass, on high/ultra. Come on over, I'll show you. I'd like to know why a game featuring a bunch of little tanks running around a virtually featureless environment cannot manage the same, even on low.

Does that sound right?

Ojisan Kukk? wrote:

Yes Sir, you may call me anything you wish from the safety of your mom's basement. But it won't change anything about the garbage you purchased.

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:

You know what big chunk of garbage the USA once purchased? It was Guam. Show some respect, otherwise you'd be speaking Japanese and have an Emperor-mandated trade school certificate in draining the octopus jism out of tentacle sexbot dunk tanks.

moron wrote:

Pay attention boys & girls, this is what happens when you learn everything you know, from Fox news. In the real world (not the one in your uneducated, racist imagination) the US did not purchase Guam. And the person you are so horrendously failing to insult is not from Guam, he is an american serviceman stationed there.

But you know, whatever makes you feel good at the next KKK rally.

ICJ wrote:

The fact that some kid in the army has enough time to get worked into a frothy lather about Steam games AND with that ample free time hasn't bothered to learn the first thing about how computers works is the greatest indictment towards wasteful military spending in the world. Instead of mewling like a newborn wankbaby the next time someone's hard-earned laptop isn't what Uncle Sam gave you for free, earnestly thank the guy for paying taxes so you can avoid conflict and ruggedly move peeled potatoes from one location to another.

I bet you're reading this in camouflage.