Commander Tansin A. Darcos wrote:

Look, [expletive deleted], I know this much: for something to be sarcasm, it has to be identifiable as such.

Tell me, from the ordinary standpoint of a reasonable person, what could allow an ordinary person to distinguish that statement as a sarcastic posting as opposed to someone simply liking what is possibly going to be an otherwise not very good movie based on the trailer? Come on, a simple explanation as how it could be determined by an ordinary, reasonable person to be sarcasm, when it is a written statement with no other clues, no tone of voice, no secondary clues like body language, that would allow an ordinary person to make such a judgement?.

Consider this: At least one executive at Sony must have thought it was funny enough to greenlight it.

Don't ever use threats at me or (uses voice of Liam Neeson in Taken) I will look for you, I will hunt you down, I will find you, and I will turn you into a real Soufflé of Pain! (I notice you're also too stupid to put the proper diacritical marks on your user name.) I will strike you down with great vengeance and furious anger, and you will know that I am the Lord, when I lay my vengeance upon thee. (Oh wait, that part was Samuel L. Jackson. Never mind.)