|
by Tansin A. Darcos (TDARCOS) 10/29/2011, 7:55am PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Furcifer wrote:
Tansin A. Darcos (TDARCOS) wrote:
As a typical man, he knows nothing about women's contraception and doesn't realize that most contraception women use works by causing the body to expel the eggs regardless of what has happened to them and by design they basically cause conception to fail if it has occurred. The pill, the IUD and essentially all non-barrier contraceptives - including the "morning after" pill - are very similar to the dreaded practices involved in a very early abortion, it's just that they expel the egg, whether or not it got fertilized. The notion that contraceptives cause regular early abortions has no basis in scientific fact, and likely began as just another bit of anti-choice propaganda.
No, you don't understand. This type of contraception causes the egg, whether or not it's fertilized, to be expelled. The conservatives think "life begins at conception" and thus if a woman is using this type of contraception, it causes any egg, whether or not fertilized, where the conception has taken place if it has, to be expelled. I think these people are generally against the "morning after pill" or other "emergency contraception" because it does the same thing.
So if regular contraceptives causes fertilized (and unfertilized, but nobody cares about those) eggs which are the product of conception to be removed from the body, how is this any different from the practice of abortion or use of an abortifacient such as mifepristone ("RU-486")?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|