 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Yeah, whoever wrote that article was terrible. by Ice Cream Jonsey 09/04/2011, 5:37pm PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
Nobody wants to read someone whoring out to fucking Kotaku tell everyone what he thinks the first five comments are going to be.
as "roster update" criticizers wrote: The guy's premise is retarded. Yes, you need to review Madden 2012 even though it's the only football game. You review it to write down all the things that are wrong with it. You review it to note all the things that it didn't do as well as NFL2K5, Front Page Sports Football 98, Mutant League Football and Atari trackball football. Even though there's one new football game this year (zero for the PC) you can still communicate with people older than 15, who remember what good football games were like. You review it because EA is a terrible publisher that makes the shittiest, most expensive games in the world. You review it because it's a chance for you to show how creative you are in crafting an entertaining review even though the subject matter is a stale, dessicated and colossal waste of time. I find myself at Deadspin, Kotaku, Joystiq and other sites and I don't know why because they're all so immensely fucking terrible. There's probably great, funny gaming and sports blogs out there that I simply don't know about because I don't have time to find them. ICJ |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
It's almost odd to see someone ask this kind of question by 09/04/2011, 1:39pm PDT  oh it was republished from kotaku by 09/04/2011, 1:45pm PDT I love how he pre-emptively dismisses people who don't play every iteration by 09/04/2011, 2:05pm PDT Yeah, whoever wrote that article was terrible. by 09/04/2011, 5:37pm PDT interesting that you list a bunch of gawker sites by 09/05/2011, 6:08pm PDT I've been much happier since deleting them from my RSS, yes. NT by 09/11/2011, 10:44am PDT |
