Forum Overview :: Peter Molyneux's The Movies :: "In Bruges" was neither funny nor workable

[quote name="Commander Tansin A. Darcos"]I know the original post was from 2008 and if I'd seen it I'd have commented sooner. It sucked. It blows. It was a piece of garbage worthy of a compost heap, which is where they should have put the negative, then buried the producer and director in the same hole that they dropped the film in, then burned them, then scattered their ashes in space so as not to contaminate the world. <i>In Bruges</i>, is a film which words cannot begin to describe how utterly worthless this movie is; we need new ones to explore the breadth of amazing, unbelievable depths of inanity this movie exposes. The nadir of insipidness. A film so bad that its level of mediocrity is measured not in degrees, but in orders of magnitude of negative exponential. Worse than Detroit. A plot killer so bad its writers should be indicted for torture-murder. A new and much, much farther expanse of reduced low in cinematic underachievement. I urge you, <i>do not</i> see it! Uh, Mr. Darcos, the producer of <i>In Bruges</i> wants to use your review for the movie. I can't understand how, but okay. <b>Advertisemen</b>t: <i>In Bruges</i> is a film which words cannot begin to descibe how... this movie is; we need new ones to explore the breadth of amazing, unbelivable depths... this movie exposes... measured not in degrees, but in orders of magnitude... A new, and much, father expanse of ... cinematic ... achievement ... see it! - <b>Commander Tansin A. Darcos, reviewer, <i>Caltrops.com</i></b> [/quote]