|
by Bitter 01/09/2005, 8:05pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hey, it's my wussy goddamn machine on my wussy goddamn DSL connection, and I will craft my Microsoft-like bloaty software if I wanna, so nyah!
If I knew Javascript or some shit, I guess it would be possible to pull down pseudonyms and thread titles only if the user wanted to search on them, but I don't. Also good would be to pull titles/pseudonyms by forum when that's desired. I can achieve the same result, but not dynamically (at least not that I know): the user would have to go through many search pages. That's kind of a pain-in-the-ass, especially when I have to remember any parameters they've entered across several pages. Some of you guys do web stuff professionally, yes? Are there suggestions? Can PHP do this stuff?
Anyhoo, I spent the last couple of hours making a couple of changes that should increase the love slightly.
- Rejiggered the formatting of results. Better, I 'spose.
- Now, when any results are retrieved, you are given the option of retrieving the entire thread where-in the results were returned. I figured that was probably the most desirable feature.
- Oh, maybe a few sub-surfacey things, I forget. Code's a little nicer, anyway.
Go
Coming at some point in the near future, maybe: formatting the text of the posts better. I haven't looked into this in detail, but I think pointy honors newlines and stuff, which I do not. Probably not more than five minutes of work (if that) once I feel enthused.
What else might be interesting? I'm thinking about doing an "everything by this author" kinda deal: we need more ruthless netstalking and also the throwing of posts from the distant past into people's faces.
Bitter.
And really, otherwise I'm just serving peer-to-peer porn and running Folding@Home, so it's not like the box is busy. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Fucking with complete, sir. Response: included by Bitter 01/09/2005, 8:05pm PST 
Re: Fucking with complete, sir. Response: included by Fullofkittens 01/09/2005, 8:47pm PST 
Re: Fucking with complete, sir. Response: included by Fussbett 01/09/2005, 9:08pm PST 
Re: Fucking with complete, sir. Response: included by Bill Dungsroman 01/10/2005, 11:52am PST 
Re: Fucking with complete, sir. Response: included by Bitter 01/13/2005, 11:49pm PST 
There's something like a 70% chance that if someone uses "cocksucker" by Senor Barborito 01/10/2005, 1:10pm PST 
What's up? by Mysterio 01/10/2005, 5:55pm PST 
Re: What's up? by Senor Barborito 01/10/2005, 6:57pm PST 
Yeah, it's a bit weird me asking for your age. What am I, a bouncer? by Mysterio 01/11/2005, 6:51pm PST 
Re: Yeah, it's a bit weird me asking for your age. What am I, a bouncer? by Senor Barborito 01/11/2005, 7:08pm PST 
She's like 25. :( NT by Creexul :( 01/11/2005, 7:32pm PST 
Thought so. Suck shit, bitch. NT by Mysterio 01/11/2005, 9:21pm PST 
So, zing? NT by Creexul :( 01/12/2005, 12:31am PST 
I thought about this whole adventure for a while and upgraded it. by Senor Barborito 01/12/2005, 2:13am PST 
Re: I thought about this whole adventure for a while and upgraded it. by Senor Barborito 01/12/2005, 7:09am PST 
|
|