 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Cain is for Delta, Charlie is for Cain by bombMexico 04/08/2008, 1:44am PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| All the Jason Bourne books that aren't the first one are awful. And as of chapter 1 so is the one written after Ludlum's death.
The movies are great tho, why are they even still making James Bond movies? A clip from the non-Matt Damon Bourne game reveals cool looking fight scenes, i'll assume this game is going to be great. Dunno how much of this is scripted, the awesome parts i guess? Shooting and close combat fighting, like Oni! Anyways the fighting system is supposed to be "simplified" but Assassin's Creed managed to still make it fun so I can't write it off yet. I'll write it off when i see there's no roofs to push people off of or retards to push into shopping stalls, a lack of pushing in general is what i'm watching out for. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Cain is for Delta, Charlie is for Cain by 04/08/2008, 1:44am PDT  The microwave has a mono beeper AND a mechanical dinger? Come on. NT by 04/08/2008, 1:54pm PDT You didn't like Casino Royale? NT by 04/08/2008, 6:54pm PDT Devil's Rejects syndrome by 04/09/2008, 2:52pm PDT This is why I read Libertas, because they give bad reviews to whatever BM likes by 04/09/2008, 3:36pm PDT Plus the novelty of a movie James Bond acting like the book James Bond. NT by 04/09/2008, 6:13pm PDT People read the books? NT by 04/12/2008, 1:21am PDT Re: Devil's Rejects syndrome by 04/11/2008, 1:18am PDT I like Bourne, I guess. Does that compromise your test? :( NT by 04/11/2008, 2:46am PDT No. You're not positive it's a good movie. The test stands! NT by 04/11/2008, 8:07pm PDT |
