Forum Overview :: Rants
 
Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by Zseni 08/30/2007, 12:39pm PDT
laudablepuss wrote:

So you think women WERE NOT gathering berries. Maybe the men were? What the hell were the women doing, then?

Honestly, I don't know. I like to gather berries. But so does everyone else on the commune.

More importantly, red is not the color of high-calorie plant food. This totally defeats their thesis (that women remember where vital plant food sources are.) It suggests that if women like red and pink because red and pink are the colors of berries, then women were shitty gatherers, passing over nuts, roots, and seeds in favor of mandrake berries.

Red and pink ARE the colors of cut-open animals, tho. Maybe women are good at gathering because they want to have stuff to trade for meat, and a dude is more likely to swap steak for strawberries than for burdock
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by Zseni 08/30/2007, 4:50am PDT NEW
    I'll bet Quentin Beck has some thoughts about what color NT by Asian women prefer 08/30/2007, 10:30am PDT NEW
    Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by laudablepuss 08/30/2007, 10:35am PDT NEW
        they were sitting around bitching about NT by the men 08/30/2007, 11:18am PDT NEW
            They were inventing agriculture, animal husbandry and medicine, among other thin NT by Confused in Columbus 08/30/2007, 12:07pm PDT NEW
                tailoring and cooking NT by Grumah 08/30/2007, 7:31pm PDT NEW
                    baby making NT by Ubisoft 09/05/2007, 5:41am PDT NEW
        Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by Zseni 08/30/2007, 12:39pm PDT NEW
            berries aren't the "pink" that men are swapping their steaks for by just ask QB 08/30/2007, 1:03pm PDT NEW
            Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by laudablepuss 08/30/2007, 3:22pm PDT NEW
                Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by Zseni 08/30/2007, 3:36pm PDT NEW
                    Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by laudablepuss 08/30/2007, 5:04pm PDT NEW
    Re: Bad Gender Science part 2058475: But women really ARE different than men! by Mischief Maker 08/30/2007, 3:03pm PDT NEW
        Colours in the abstract! Which do you prefer? by Quentin Beck 08/30/2007, 6:52pm PDT NEW
            Re: Colours in the abstract! Which do you prefer? by Zseni 08/30/2007, 11:19pm PDT NEW
                Wasn't Viridian a planet in a Star Trek movie? NT by laudablepuss 08/31/2007, 12:40am PDT NEW
                    Yes; the term is latin for "Man Berries" - obvious Kirkian ramifications. NT by Zseni 08/31/2007, 12:53am PDT NEW
                    It was a solar system that Malcolm McDowell destroys to steer the course of the NT by Jhoh Clbbl O_____O 08/31/2007, 1:02am PDT NEW
                    Vulcan was some roman diety THING, romulan is the same shit, star trek isnt so c NT by Grumah 08/31/2007, 7:20am PDT NEW
                The official colours of diseases by Quentin Beck 09/01/2007, 9:38pm PDT NEW
    They should just call it the Kirk-Picard test and avoid all the controversy. by Jerry Whorebach 09/05/2007, 6:05am PDT NEW
        "The Picard" by Zseni 09/13/2007, 10:44pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy