Jhoh Cable o_O wrote:

Jerry Whorebach wrote:

Reichsminister Doktor Goebbels wrote:

If you hate Mark Ruffalo as the handsome, stammering, non-threatening pretty boy he plays in every other movie, you’ll have to find a new reason to hate him here. He actually acts, kind of. For the role, Ruffalo put on 30 lbs. of ugly weight, lots of ugly 1970s cop clothing, and some irritating but dead-on affectations of real-life Det. David Toschi.

Why should pampered actors get credit for something me and probably you do and I know the Cables also do EVERY SINGLE DAYy?!?

Reichsminister Doktor Goebbels wrote:

There is one last good reason to like this movie. It uses that device where an incongruously upbeat or trippy song from the 1960s plays while something unpleasant takes place onscreen. It showed up in a lot of old slasher movies, and in stuff like Pulp Fiction and Forrest Gump. It is probably a stupid reason to like a movie, actually. Positive, anyway!

This was one good reason to like that episode of CSI directed by Quentin Tarantino, Grave Danger. Another good reason was the awesome pun right in the episode title (I won't spoil it for you if you haven't seen it yet).

The name Grave Danger refers to the fact that it's a two parter and for the last 20 minutes of the last part, Gil keeps calling Nick Stokes (CSI, ba da badaaaaa) "Pancho" over and over and over again. I wonder what director was responsible for that.

Also the scene near the beginning of part one where for no reason the creepy lab guy is playing the Dukes of Hazzard board game and as he describes the rules he actually becomes Quentin Tarantino you know? Or at least Norm Macdonald's impression of him okay?